ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs Sign Former Bucs LT Donovan Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348614)

ForeverIowan 05-03-2023 06:44 PM

Where are all the people who were ADAMANT Taylor was the left tackle and there was NO CHANCE we would consider drafting a left tackle in the 1st round. The Franchise get your ass in here! Veach was hoping one of the tackles would fall in the draft. Taylor was, is and always has been the plan for RIGHT tackle.

TwistedChief 05-03-2023 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16932406)
$100, also this only applies if Taylor is healthy.

Done. But it also only applies if Smith is healthy.

The Franchise 05-03-2023 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverIowan (Post 16932407)
Where are all the people who were ADAMANT Taylor was the left tackle and there was NO CHANCE we would consider drafting a left tackle in the 1st round. The Franchise get your ass in here! Veach was hoping one of the tackles would fall in the draft. Taylor was, is and always has been the plan for RIGHT tackle.

I’m already in here, ****. Let me know where it’s been announced that Smith is starting LT week 1? Oh it hasn’t been? Then ****ing blow me.

Did we draft a tackle in the first round? No? Second round? No? Kill yourself.

TwistedChief 05-03-2023 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverIowan (Post 16932407)
Where are all the people who were ADAMANT Taylor was the left tackle and there was NO CHANCE we would consider drafting a left tackle in the 1st round. The Franchise get your ass in here! Veach was hoping one of the tackles would fall in the draft. Taylor was, is and always has been the plan for RIGHT tackle.

We have no idea what this means.

Kindly go **** yourself and then **** your bff UChieffy.

T-post Tom 05-03-2023 06:48 PM

I’m riding with Veach. Giddyup!

raybec 4 05-03-2023 06:48 PM

There's some serious pants pooping in this thread over the signing of an offensive lineman, which we all (or most of us) agreed was a need.

dirk digler 05-03-2023 06:48 PM

:eek::eek::eek:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NFL also keeps track of &quot;nullified yards,&quot; in plays negated by penalties. League leaders for 2022:<br><br>Donovan Smith, Bucs: 111<br>Abraham Lucas, Seahawks: 94<br>Matt Nelson, Lions: 86<br>Kevin Dotson, Steelers: 80<br>Jake Brendel, 49ers: 71</p>&mdash; Greg Auman (@gregauman) <a href="https://twitter.com/gregauman/status/1615813938364485654?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 18, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 05-03-2023 06:48 PM

If the Chiefs always had Taylor penciled in at RT, and preferred to draft a LT, they would've made a move for Harrison.

Titty Meat 05-03-2023 06:49 PM

I want someone to love me the way Veach loves improving the o line

staylor26 05-03-2023 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16932415)
:eek::eek::eek:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NFL also keeps track of &quot;nullified yards,&quot; in plays negated by penalties. League leaders for 2022:<br><br>Donovan Smith, Bucs: 111<br>Abraham Lucas, Seahawks: 94<br>Matt Nelson, Lions: 86<br>Kevin Dotson, Steelers: 80<br>Jake Brendel, 49ers: 71</p>&mdash; Greg Auman (@gregauman) <a href="https://twitter.com/gregauman/status/1615813938364485654?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 18, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Again, remember when everybody did this with Mike Remmers?

OMG he's terrible!

Then he turned out to be a really nice value signing.

RaidersOftheCellar 05-03-2023 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 16932207)
Donovan Smith’s 2022 PFF grade: 58
Jawaan Taylor’s 2022 PFF grade: 58

<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="4957668" data-share-method="host" data-aspect-ratio="1.33333" data-width="52%"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/bold-strategy-dodgeball-cotton-strategy-tactics-gif-4957668">Bold Strategy Dodgeball GIF</a>from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/bold+strategy-gifs">Bold Strategy GIFs</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

KC’s 2023 PFF roster ranking: #1
Denver’s 2023 PFF roster ranking: #28

Bold strategy, General Paton.

LMAO LMAO LMAO

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932381)
But what if you're also starting Niang at RT?

Or Blaine Gabbert?

At a point you can't just presume nothing will work.

But again, I'm fine with this. And would've been fine staying pat. And I'm a guy that was hoping for a 1st round RT.

Wisconsin_Chief 05-03-2023 06:51 PM

The guy is starting at LT this year and Taylor is staying at RT. Pretty much that simple. They’ll get Taylor some reps an LT in practice and if he looks good enough they’ll move him over next year and let Morris take over RT. You’re not signing a tackle with this kind of experience at LT to be a backup so you can play a guy who’s never played LT, and then start a guy like Niang at RT.

You start the 2 best tackles on the roster, and that’s Smith and Taylor. LT vs RT is pretty insignificant at this point, and you’re not going to play two guys on the opposites sides of where they’ve played and thrived their whole careers. That makes zero sense whatsoever. Stop looking at the money, it doesn’t matter at this point. You have 2 starting tackles making a total of $29 million (at most) which is doable. You can slowly transition Taylor and plug him in at LT next year if he shows enough. This gives you more time to figure that out.

I absolutely love this move, and I applaud Veach for covering his ass with Taylor, and then clearly seeing another opportunity to give Patrick even more protection and taking advantage of it. I feel so much better with a combo of Smith/Taylor than I would have with Taylor/Niang, and I don’t know how anyone could disagree. The tackle spots have been drastically upgraded. I cannot believe people are complaining about this. It makes us a better team without question. If Smith returns to his 2021 form, you possibly have the best offensive line in the league, and you also have a ton of depth. Just awesome. Veach truly never, ever stops.

Sassy Squatch 05-03-2023 06:52 PM

I mean, salary cap does roll over year to year. It's never wise to just throw it into the void, and that's potentially what you've done here with this bum. May have to start simply based on another dude not being able to play and sucks at his job while meeting his incentives.

ForeverIowan 05-03-2023 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932416)
If the Chiefs always had Taylor penciled in at RT, and preferred to draft a LT, they would've made a move for Harrison.

They tried. Veach said no one in that 24,25,26, 27 territory was interested in trading. The calls were made.

tredadda 05-03-2023 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932368)
Don't know why you'd think that's a point with me. Been wanting his ass gone for a long time. Didn't hurt my feelings one bit when he got gone.

It's not meant to be a point, but more to highlight your OMG the sky is falling because of this signing! Mahomes will run for his life because a guy who is not even the starting LT will get him killed as if Mahomes was unfamiliar with that. He would be at worst another Brown Jr if he ends up at LT.

Sassy Squatch 05-03-2023 06:54 PM

And yeah, absolutely nothing suggests to me he'll come here and magically be improved over 2022. Stepping into a new system that is notoriously hard on the OTs in particular after blocking for a QB who's game was based on making reads and firing quickly.

staylor26 05-03-2023 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932422)
I mean, salary cap does roll over year to year. It's never wise to just throw it into the void, and that's potentially what you've done here with this bum. May have to start simply based on another dude not being able to play and sucks at his job while meeting his incentives.

Or you know he gets forced to start due to injury and he returns to his previous form and therefore turns out to be a very valuable depth signing.

But continue to be a negative **** because the Chiefs got better and more experienced at T.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932426)
And yeah, absolutely nothing suggests to me he'll come here and magically be improved over 2022. Stepping into a new system that is notoriously hard on the OTs in particular after blocking for a QB who's game was based on making reads and firing quickly.

Agree. Its also not so hard playing tackle for Brady. Stands in the pocket and gets it out quick.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932422)
I mean, salary cap does roll over year to year. It's never wise to just throw it into the void, and that's potentially what you've done here with this bum. May have to start simply based on another dude not being able to play and sucks at his job while meeting his incentives.

Again, in the worst year by FAR he was a solid pass blocker.

You're not paying attention to anything anyone says right now.

ForeverIowan 05-03-2023 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverIowan (Post 16932407)
Where are all the people who were ADAMANT Taylor was the left tackle and there was NO CHANCE we would consider drafting a left tackle in the 1st round. The Franchise get your ass in here! Veach was hoping one of the tackles would fall in the draft. Taylor was, is and always has been the plan for RIGHT tackle.

Taylor has played his ENTIRE career at right tackle

Smith has played his ENTIRE career at left tackle

Taylor and Smith are clearly going to be the two best tackles on our roster. Yeah though lets switch em up and not let either guy play at their natural position with YEARS of experience. ****ing MORON!

SHOWTIME 05-03-2023 06:56 PM

Donovan smith sucks

staylor26 05-03-2023 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932430)
Again, I'm the worst year by FAR he was a solid pass blocker.

You're not paying attention to anything anyone says right now.

Hes not at all. He's just sticking his fingers in his ear like a child.

tredadda 05-03-2023 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932372)
Yes. Based on your take they only need to be as good as Wylie. KC won the SB with Wylie. So yes I think one of those guys can at least be one of the worst RT in the league per your opinion of Wylie.

But they weren't as good as Wylie. That's the point. They could be a downgrade and don't let the SB cloud things, Wylie was bad all year. I personally would prefer we upgrade from Wylie, not downgrade.

dirk digler 05-03-2023 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932418)
Again, remember when everybody did this with Mike Remmers?

OMG he's terrible!

Then he turned out to be a really nice value signing.

He was a nice value signing until he had to start in the SB :p

Sassy Squatch 05-03-2023 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932430)
Again, in the worst year by FAR he was a solid pass blocker.

You're not paying attention to anything anyone says right now.

I am. I just don't see why anything would change. He's moving to a system that is notoriously difficult on OTs and is undoubtedly harder than blocking for Brady and his constant dumpoffs.

staylor26 05-03-2023 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16932435)
He was a nice value signing until he had to start in the SB :p

Umm you need to get your memory checked because he was basically the Chiefs starting RT that year and turned out to be a blessing when Schwartz went down.

Titty Meat 05-03-2023 06:59 PM

He could be Remmers or he could be Jah Reid I don't see what the big deal is he's maybe the starting right tackle or a backup LT with years of experience

tredadda 05-03-2023 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932377)
Remember when Mike Remmers sucked and then he turned out to be a really good value signing for the Chiefs?

Yup. Until the SB and he made the move to LT. That's why this signing could be pretty decent. If Taylor were to go down it would be nice to have a backup that has proven to be solid at LT to fill in.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932436)
I am. I just don't see why anything would change. He's moving to a system that is notoriously difficult on OTs and is undoubtedly harder than blocking for Brady and his constant dumpoffs.

In '17-'19 he was pass blocking for the dumbest, ball holdingest QB in the league and was just fine. With a HC who uses his OTs very much like Reid does.

There is just no reason to write him off out of the chute.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 16932441)
Yup. Until the SB and he made the move to LT. That's why this signing could be pretty decent. If Taylor were to go down it would be nice to have a backup that has proven to be solid at LT to fill in.

The entire OL fell apart. Still doesn't change the fact that he was a very valuable signing.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932443)
In '17-'19 he was pass blocking for the dumbest, ball holdingest QB in the league and was just fine. With a HC who uses his OTs very much like Reid does.

There is just no reason to write him off out of the chute.

Yup, he's 29. I could see if he were old and fell off a cliff last year, but he's still young enough to get back on track after a bad year.

RunKC 05-03-2023 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932426)
And yeah, absolutely nothing suggests to me he'll come here and magically be improved over 2022.

Yeah having to be perfect against speed rushers bc your 45 year statue of a QB isn’t what he was anymore is forcing you to play perfect. And even then he was solid in pass pro.

I’m sure Mahomes does nothing for his tackles to help them or make them look better. Nope not at all. We didn’t see any of that last year.

Good God dude take a cannabis chewie and calm the **** down.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 16932434)
But they weren't as good as Wylie. That's the point. They could be a downgrade and don't let the SB cloud things, Wylie was bad all year. I personally would prefer we upgrade from Wylie, not downgrade.

Fact. You dont know that.
You said Wylie was one of the worst. Chiefs were 14-3. Im not a Wylie fan. Glad he played well in the playoffs.

These guys can be bad too. So they are worse than one of the worst? If you are suggesting they are that bad then they should not be on the roster.

20 million is left tackle money and preferable proven left tackle money.

So I like Veach. He is exceptional but not perfect. If he signed this guy Smith and is supported then the other guys he has on the roster should also be supported. Do you think KC keeps guys that are worse than the one of the worst? I dont.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932445)
Yup, he's 29. I could see if he were old and fell off a cliff last year, but he's still young enough to get back on track after a bad year.

He's a former 2nd rounder (so strong pedigree) who started as a rookie and for the first 7 years of an 8 year career was never anything less than a solid starting caliber LT.

And despite all that, and based on a deal we know NOTHING about, we have people wanting to lambast the signing by saying it's a given he'll suck and yet still trigger every guarantee.

Well - at least we know who this seasons whipping boy is gonna be. Fair or otherwise...

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932405)
Your asking in emergency. Chiefs have several decent guards. Thuney has played some LT and played well. If Taylor and Smith are out, very possible, who plays? Thuney is an option. Veach and Reid have both stated it in the past. They like flexibilty.

So downgrade LT and LG at the same time? Brilliant!

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932451)
He's a former 2nd rounder (so strong pedigree) who started as a rookie and for the first 7 years of an 8 year career was never anything less than a solid starting caliber LT.

And despite all that, and based on a deal we know NOTHING about, we have people wanting to lambast the signing by saying it's a given he'll suck and yet still trigger every guarantee.

Well - at least we know who this seasons whipping boy is gonna be. Fair or otherwise...

100%

Superturtle missed bitching about OBJ. That really might be all this is.

ThaVirus 05-03-2023 07:06 PM

This dude is buns and I don’t like the optics of this on the surface with the high (possible) cap hit and uncertainty about if he will start and where..

But I trust Bratt Varnch, Reid, and Mahomes to get it right.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932451)
He's a former 2nd rounder (so strong pedigree) who started as a rookie and for the first 7 years of an 8 year career was never anything less than a solid starting caliber LT.

And despite all that, and based on a deal we know NOTHING about, we have people wanting to lambast the signing by saying it's a given he'll suck and yet still trigger every guarantee.

Well - at least we know who this seasons whipping boy is gonna be. Fair or otherwise...

I think its a discussion on a discussion platform. Would be rather boring if everyone agreed. You can get that on the Coalition. Its more a cult. You get banned if you express a non cult opinion.

dirk digler 05-03-2023 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932439)
Umm you need to get your memory checked because he was basically the Chiefs starting RT that year and turned out to be a blessing when Schwartz went down.

I remember barely but I know he played LT in the SB and well we know how that turned out.

In regards to Donovan as I have said as backup, this is fine and hope we don't have to use him as a the starting LT for any length of time.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932454)
100%

Superturtle missed bitching about OBJ. That really might be all this is.

I've been waking up in cold sweats wondering who I'm going to bitch about with Clark gone and with my expectations that Moore will be reasonably productive.

I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****.

ThaVirus 05-03-2023 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932459)
I've been waking up in cold sweats wondering who I'm going to bitch about with Clark gone and with my expectations that Moore will be reasonably productive.

I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****.

I’m still targeting CEH. Any snap that guy steals from Pacheco and McKinnon is a waste.

Sassy Squatch 05-03-2023 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932459)
I've been waking up in cold sweats wondering who I'm going to bitch about with Clark gone and with my expectations that Moore will be reasonably productive.

I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****.

LMAO Was literally getting ready to post about that. It was genuinely funny to me that you were the one scolding me about that given your history with Clark.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932459)
I've been waking up in cold sweats wondering who I'm going to bitch about with Clark gone and with my expectations that Moore will be reasonably productive.

I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****.

ROFL

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 16932453)
So downgrade LT and LG at the same time? Brilliant!

In an emergency you do what you have to do. Reid has stated he would use Thuney at LT. You should feel very fortunate to be so brilliant. LOL If your starter goes down anything you do is a downgrade.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932456)
I think its a discussion on a discussion platform. Would be rather boring if everyone agreed. You can get that on the Coalition. Its more a cult. You get banned if you express a non cult opinion.

"He sucks" isn't a discussion. You say he's going to suck because he sucked last year. I've responded (and others) with reasons why that may absolutely not be the case AND by pointing out that we know nothing about his deal. What we know is that we don't have the space to absorb $9 million in cap charges so these incentives are almost certainly going to have to be NLTBE. And if so, since he played 13 games last year, those are likely to be SB and/or AFCCG based.

And you have repeated that he sucked last year.

Okay.

That's not a discussion. That's just bitching and wailing.

emaw82 05-03-2023 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 16932219)
Broncos 2022 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2021 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2020 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2019 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2018 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2017 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2
Broncos 2016 Record Against the Chiefs: 0-2

Crazy that we haven't met them in the playoffs during that stretch to make it 0-3. Wonder why that is...

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16932460)
I’m still targeting CEH. Any snap that guy steals from Pacheco and McKinnon is a waste.

Oh thank God. Thank you! Yeah, that works.

And Nnadi.

Phew - crisis averted.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16932458)
I remember barely but I know he played LT in the SB and well we know how that turned out.

In regards to Donovan as I have said as backup, this is fine and hope we don't have to use him as a the starting LT for any length of time.

You realize that basically our entire OL was backups, and Remmers had to move to LT just for the SB, right?

If the Chiefs had Schwartz and the rest of the OL, Remmers would've been fine.

Again, it's not even debatable. He "sucked" then turned out to be a really good value signing.

Sassy Squatch 05-03-2023 07:12 PM

Maybe Marpit retiring ****ed him. Maybe he just needs an absolute beast at LG to compensate for his shortcomings. We have one in Thuney. There. I was positive for a bit.

raybec 4 05-03-2023 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932459)
I've been waking up in cold sweats wondering who I'm going to bitch about with Clark gone and with my expectations that Moore will be reasonably productive.

I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****.

You're turning to the dark side man. But, reasonably productive is pretty subjective.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16932455)
This dude is buns and I don’t like the optics of this on the surface with the high (possible) cap hit and uncertainty about if he will start and where..

But I trust Bratt Varnch, Reid, and Mahomes to get it right.

9 mil is not high for a guy who would likely have to be a starter to reach those incentives.

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932444)
The entire OL fell apart. Still doesn't change the fact that he was a very valuable signing.

Correct, but I was only referring to Remmers in my point. I still believe and will continue to believe that Fisher's injury in the AFCCG after the game was all but decided cost KC to lose the SB. That was the final domino to fall and resulted in a complete reshift of the line that TB abused.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932465)
"He sucks" isn't a discussion. You say he's going to suck because he sucked last year. I've responded (and others) with reasons why that may absolutely not be the case AND by pointing out that we know nothing about his deal. What we know is that we don't have the space to absorb $9 million in cap charges so these incentives are almost certainly going to have to be NLTBE. And if so, since he played 13 games last year, those are likely to be SB and/or AFCCG based.

And you have repeated that he sucked last year.

Okay.

That's not a discussion. That's just bitching and wailing.

I do not think I have used the word sucks. You have the wrong guy. I am not bitching. Its an opinion. Bottom line is its not a very critical move. Cap space could be an issue.

Seems you are bitching about others opinions. Maybe its just a discussion.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16932470)
Maybe Marpit retiring ****ed him. Maybe he just needs an absolute beast at LG to compensate for his shortcomings. We have one in Thuney. There. I was positive for a bit.

https://i.imgur.com/LYa6BYn.gif

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932469)
You realize that basically our entire OL was backups, and Remmers had to move to LT just for the SB, right?

If the Chiefs had Schwartz and the rest of the OL, Remmers would've been fine.

Again, it's not even debatable. He "sucked" then turned out to be a really good value signing.

Yeah, that OL took so many bullets and kept playing admirably. Remmers was a HUGE part of that.

Fisher was just the last straw. It was one more blow than they could take.

In a way it made what the staff (and the players) were able to accomplish that season all the more impressive.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932476)
I do not think I have used the word sucks. I am not bitching. Its an opinion. Bottom line is its not a very critical move. Cap space could be an issue.

Seems you are bitching about others opinions. Maybe its just a discussion.

LMAO

Yea, that's really going to be an issue! The Chiefs have no idea how this will impact their cap situation this year in ****ing May.

Rasputin 05-03-2023 07:17 PM

We upgraded both our left and right tackles this offseason. Way to go Brute Velmore.



To the aircraft carrier

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16932471)
You're turning to the dark side man. But, reasonably productive is pretty subjective.

Said it even last year when I was the Chief Moore Hater - I was completely comfortable letting JJSS walk because I thought Moore could replace him. Shit, my Sous Moore Hater - Detox - was right there with me. It was strange - the dudes that were said to hate Moore all last season were the guys yelling the loudest to start him this year.

dirk digler 05-03-2023 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932469)
You realize that basically our entire OL was backups, and Remmers had to move to LT just for the SB, right?

If the Chiefs had Schwartz and the rest of the OL, Remmers would've been fine.

Again, it's not even debatable. He "sucked" then turned out to be a really good value signing.

Of course I remember and yes if Schwartz or Fisher would have played we would have been much better off. Remmers or Wylie at RT is fine as Pat can protect himself by seeing the rush. Don't want a turnstile at LT though and that was what Smith was last year along with committing the second most penalties in the NFL.

Once again as backup this is cool. no problem with it.

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932449)
Fact. You dont know that.
You said Wylie was one of the worst. Chiefs were 14-3. Im not a Wylie fan. Glad he played well in the playoffs.

These guys can be bad too. So they are worse than one of the worst? If you are suggesting they are that bad then they should not be on the roster.

20 million is left tackle money and preferable proven left tackle money.

So I like Veach. He is exceptional but not perfect. If he signed this guy Smith and is supported then the other guys he has on the roster should also be supported. Do you think KC keeps guys that are worse than the one of the worst? I dont.

Whole lotta wrong in what you just posted. Unless a coach plays favorites then the backups inherently are going to be worse than the starter. If they weren't, they would be starting. So yes, you have some of them who are worse than Wylie, hence why he started and not them. To get rid of them is foolish because then you have no depth in case Wylie goes down.

Just because KC went 14-3 with him starting does not mean they should downgrade the position because of Mahomes' and Reid's ability to adjust. Regarding the bolded part, I have zero clue what you are talking about.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932482)
LMAO

Yea, that's really going to be an issue! The Chiefs have no idea how this will impact their cap situation this year in ****ing May.

I trust KC has a plan and its not based on anything here. Nobody knows what is really going on at Arrowhead.

Reid and Veach have proven they get results. I trust that.

Maybe we should just post HAPPY THOUGHTS? That would be entertaining.

ThaVirus 05-03-2023 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16932472)
9 mil is not high for a guy who would likely have to be a starter to reach those incentives.

Well I saw some stuff posted in this thread suggesting that the organization views him as a starter. He is likely to hit those incentives if that’s true.

$9m could be high for this douche. He’s like a Wylie-level player and we had Wylie last year for only $2.5m.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:22 PM

Also, isn't the most likely scenario that this is 'Taylor can't make the switch to the left side' insurance?

SHOWTIME 05-03-2023 07:24 PM

Donovan Smith may be a decent backup, but he really regressed last year once Ali Marpet retired. I wouldn't have high expectations for him.

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16932490)
Well I saw some stuff posted in this thread suggesting that the organization views him as a starter. He is likely to hit those incentives if that’s true.

$9m could be high for this douche. He’s like a Wylie-level player and we had Wylie last year for only $2.5m.

Prior to last season he was a Taylor Decker level player and he made $15 million.

The risk is priced in. And that's IF he hits all his incentives.

dirk digler 05-03-2023 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932491)
Also, isn't the most likely scenario that this is 'Taylor can't make the switch to the left side' insurance?

Probably

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FANATIC (Post 16932464)
In an emergency you do what you have to do. Reid has stated he would use Thuney at LT. You should feel very fortunate to be so brilliant. LOL If your starter goes down anything you do is a downgrade.

Except you don't double the problem by downgrading not one but two positions. If our LT goes down, you plug in a backup and adjust. You don't plug him in with your All Pro LG who would struggle there and then downgrade your LG as well leaving your whole left side compromised. Sure you could put him in to finish a game in the most dire circumstance (such as Reid finishing kicking duties week 1), but you don't go into a week with that plan.

Titty Meat 05-03-2023 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932491)
Also, isn't the most likely scenario that this is 'Taylor can't make the switch to the left side' insurance?

Seems like alot of money to give to Taylor if you have doubts he can work at LT though

DJ's left nut 05-03-2023 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16932500)
Seems like alot of money to give to Taylor if you have doubts he can work at LT though

Yeah, it is.

But you also have an injury prone RT or a rookie. There are a LOT of question marks at OT and any one of them going south could give you a real problem.

So...an incentive laden contract for a high pedigree younger veteran with a history of strong performance is hardly a poor decision.

And hell, Taylor could be slow to transition to LT this season, be ready to do so next season and still prove to be a reasonable signing at LT long-term.

staylor26 05-03-2023 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHOWTIME (Post 16932495)
Donovan Smith may be a decent backup, but he really regressed last year once Ali Marpet retired. I wouldn't have high expectations for him.

I haven't seen a single person express "high expectations"

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932503)
Yeah, it is.

But you also have an injury prone RT or a rookie. There are a LOT of question marks at OT and any one of them going south could give you a real problem.

So...an incentive laden contract for a high pedigree younger veteran with a history of strong performance is hardly a poor decision.

And hell, Taylor could be slow to transition to LT this season, be ready to do so next season and still prove to be a reasonable signing at LT long-term.

Good points!

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHOWTIME (Post 16932495)
Donovan Smith may be a decent backup, but he really regressed last year once Ali Marpet retired. I wouldn't have high expectations for him.

If only he was able to sign with an organization known for reviving careers. That would be a great decision by him.

RaidersOftheCellar 05-03-2023 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief (Post 16932421)
The guy is starting at LT this year and Taylor is staying at RT. Pretty much that simple. They’ll get Taylor some reps an LT in practice and if he looks good enough they’ll move him over next year and let Morris take over RT. You’re not signing a tackle with this kind of experience at LT to be a backup so you can play a guy who’s never played LT, and then start a guy like Niang at RT.

You start the 2 best tackles on the roster, and that’s Smith and Taylor. LT vs RT is pretty insignificant at this point, and you’re not going to play two guys on the opposites sides of where they’ve played and thrived their whole careers. That makes zero sense whatsoever. Stop looking at the money, it doesn’t matter at this point. You have 2 starting tackles making a total of $29 million (at most) which is doable. You can slowly transition Taylor and plug him in at LT next year if he shows enough. This gives you more time to figure that out.

I absolutely love this move, and I applaud Veach for covering his ass with Taylor, and then clearly seeing another opportunity to give Patrick even more protection and taking advantage of it. I feel so much better with a combo of Smith/Taylor than I would have with Taylor/Niang, and I don’t know how anyone could disagree. The tackle spots have been drastically upgraded. I cannot believe people are complaining about this. It makes us a better team without question. If Smith returns to his 2021 form, you possibly have the best offensive line in the league, and you also have a ton of depth. Just awesome. Veach truly never, ever stops.

You’d consider Smith an upgrade over Brown at LT?

Dante84 05-03-2023 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 16932304)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">2017: 7 sacks, 42 pressures, 9 penalties<br>2016: 3 sacks, 57 pressures, 13 penalties<br>2015: 4 sacks, 54 pressures, 11 penalties</p>&mdash; Farzin Vousoughian (@Farzin21) <a href="https://twitter.com/Farzin21/status/1653905779185811457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Something I wasn’t thinking about earlier. He was basically Rashaad Fenton, but at a more premium position.

By that I mean:

He doesn’t “suck” because he allows a ton of pressures and sacks.

He “sucks” because he got a lot of penalties.

Fenton didn’t suck because he allowed catches/yards/TD’s. He sucked because he got a lot of penalties.

When viewing this from the lens of: “My primary goal is to eliminate injury risk for Patrick,” then Veach definitely got better in that department today.

tredadda 05-03-2023 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16932503)
Yeah, it is.

But you also have an injury prone RT or a rookie. There are a LOT of question marks at OT and any one of them going south could give you a real problem.

So...an incentive laden contract for a high pedigree younger veteran with a history of strong performance is hardly a poor decision.

And hell, Taylor could be slow to transition to LT this season, be ready to do so next season and still prove to be a reasonable signing at LT long-term.

I still think KC paid a premium for Taylor because of the LT market and the high likelihood that they would not get high enough for a LT or have one fall to them (which ended up not happening). Imagine had their plan to pay Smith and have him all but be guaranteed the starting LT out of necessity.

Bump 05-03-2023 07:35 PM

ok! I like it, another lineman just in case things aren't looking too good at RT with Taylor at LT. Maybe this guy gets LT and Taylor stays at RT if he's looking good and Niang and a rookie aren't.

Bowser 05-03-2023 07:36 PM

It's moves like this (and the subsequent reactions to them) that guarantee the Chargers to be offseason champs every single year.

FANATIC 05-03-2023 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 16932519)
ok! I like it, another lineman just in case things aren't looking too good at RT with Taylor at LT. Maybe this guy gets LT and Taylor stays at RT if he's looking good and Niang and a rookie aren't.

Maybe Niang is still hurting a bit and not be ready?

redfan 05-03-2023 07:37 PM

Always like to see the team get more protection for PMII.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.