![]() |
Where are all the people who were ADAMANT Taylor was the left tackle and there was NO CHANCE we would consider drafting a left tackle in the 1st round. The Franchise get your ass in here! Veach was hoping one of the tackles would fall in the draft. Taylor was, is and always has been the plan for RIGHT tackle.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did we draft a tackle in the first round? No? Second round? No? Kill yourself. |
Quote:
Kindly go **** yourself and then **** your bff UChieffy. |
I’m riding with Veach. Giddyup!
|
There's some serious pants pooping in this thread over the signing of an offensive lineman, which we all (or most of us) agreed was a need.
|
:eek::eek::eek:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NFL also keeps track of "nullified yards," in plays negated by penalties. League leaders for 2022:<br><br>Donovan Smith, Bucs: 111<br>Abraham Lucas, Seahawks: 94<br>Matt Nelson, Lions: 86<br>Kevin Dotson, Steelers: 80<br>Jake Brendel, 49ers: 71</p>— Greg Auman (@gregauman) <a href="https://twitter.com/gregauman/status/1615813938364485654?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 18, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
If the Chiefs always had Taylor penciled in at RT, and preferred to draft a LT, they would've made a move for Harrison.
|
I want someone to love me the way Veach loves improving the o line
|
Quote:
OMG he's terrible! Then he turned out to be a really nice value signing. |
Quote:
Denver’s 2023 PFF roster ranking: #28 Bold strategy, General Paton. LMAO LMAO LMAO |
Quote:
At a point you can't just presume nothing will work. But again, I'm fine with this. And would've been fine staying pat. And I'm a guy that was hoping for a 1st round RT. |
The guy is starting at LT this year and Taylor is staying at RT. Pretty much that simple. They’ll get Taylor some reps an LT in practice and if he looks good enough they’ll move him over next year and let Morris take over RT. You’re not signing a tackle with this kind of experience at LT to be a backup so you can play a guy who’s never played LT, and then start a guy like Niang at RT.
You start the 2 best tackles on the roster, and that’s Smith and Taylor. LT vs RT is pretty insignificant at this point, and you’re not going to play two guys on the opposites sides of where they’ve played and thrived their whole careers. That makes zero sense whatsoever. Stop looking at the money, it doesn’t matter at this point. You have 2 starting tackles making a total of $29 million (at most) which is doable. You can slowly transition Taylor and plug him in at LT next year if he shows enough. This gives you more time to figure that out. I absolutely love this move, and I applaud Veach for covering his ass with Taylor, and then clearly seeing another opportunity to give Patrick even more protection and taking advantage of it. I feel so much better with a combo of Smith/Taylor than I would have with Taylor/Niang, and I don’t know how anyone could disagree. The tackle spots have been drastically upgraded. I cannot believe people are complaining about this. It makes us a better team without question. If Smith returns to his 2021 form, you possibly have the best offensive line in the league, and you also have a ton of depth. Just awesome. Veach truly never, ever stops. |
I mean, salary cap does roll over year to year. It's never wise to just throw it into the void, and that's potentially what you've done here with this bum. May have to start simply based on another dude not being able to play and sucks at his job while meeting his incentives.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
And yeah, absolutely nothing suggests to me he'll come here and magically be improved over 2022. Stepping into a new system that is notoriously hard on the OTs in particular after blocking for a QB who's game was based on making reads and firing quickly.
|
Quote:
But continue to be a negative **** because the Chiefs got better and more experienced at T. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're not paying attention to anything anyone says right now. |
Quote:
Smith has played his ENTIRE career at left tackle Taylor and Smith are clearly going to be the two best tackles on our roster. Yeah though lets switch em up and not let either guy play at their natural position with YEARS of experience. ****ing MORON! |
Donovan smith sucks
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He could be Remmers or he could be Jah Reid I don't see what the big deal is he's maybe the starting right tackle or a backup LT with years of experience
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is just no reason to write him off out of the chute. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m sure Mahomes does nothing for his tackles to help them or make them look better. Nope not at all. We didn’t see any of that last year. Good God dude take a cannabis chewie and calm the **** down. |
Quote:
You said Wylie was one of the worst. Chiefs were 14-3. Im not a Wylie fan. Glad he played well in the playoffs. These guys can be bad too. So they are worse than one of the worst? If you are suggesting they are that bad then they should not be on the roster. 20 million is left tackle money and preferable proven left tackle money. So I like Veach. He is exceptional but not perfect. If he signed this guy Smith and is supported then the other guys he has on the roster should also be supported. Do you think KC keeps guys that are worse than the one of the worst? I dont. |
Quote:
And despite all that, and based on a deal we know NOTHING about, we have people wanting to lambast the signing by saying it's a given he'll suck and yet still trigger every guarantee. Well - at least we know who this seasons whipping boy is gonna be. Fair or otherwise... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Superturtle missed bitching about OBJ. That really might be all this is. |
This dude is buns and I don’t like the optics of this on the surface with the high (possible) cap hit and uncertainty about if he will start and where..
But I trust Bratt Varnch, Reid, and Mahomes to get it right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In regards to Donovan as I have said as backup, this is fine and hope we don't have to use him as a the starting LT for any length of time. |
Quote:
I feel ya, Superturtle. Sometimes it's hard being a miserable ****. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And you have repeated that he sucked last year. Okay. That's not a discussion. That's just bitching and wailing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And Nnadi. Phew - crisis averted. |
Quote:
If the Chiefs had Schwartz and the rest of the OL, Remmers would've been fine. Again, it's not even debatable. He "sucked" then turned out to be a really good value signing. |
Maybe Marpit retiring ****ed him. Maybe he just needs an absolute beast at LG to compensate for his shortcomings. We have one in Thuney. There. I was positive for a bit.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seems you are bitching about others opinions. Maybe its just a discussion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fisher was just the last straw. It was one more blow than they could take. In a way it made what the staff (and the players) were able to accomplish that season all the more impressive. |
Quote:
Yea, that's really going to be an issue! The Chiefs have no idea how this will impact their cap situation this year in ****ing May. |
We upgraded both our left and right tackles this offseason. Way to go Brute Velmore.
To the aircraft carrier |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Once again as backup this is cool. no problem with it. |
Quote:
Just because KC went 14-3 with him starting does not mean they should downgrade the position because of Mahomes' and Reid's ability to adjust. Regarding the bolded part, I have zero clue what you are talking about. |
Quote:
Reid and Veach have proven they get results. I trust that. Maybe we should just post HAPPY THOUGHTS? That would be entertaining. |
Quote:
$9m could be high for this douche. He’s like a Wylie-level player and we had Wylie last year for only $2.5m. |
Also, isn't the most likely scenario that this is 'Taylor can't make the switch to the left side' insurance?
|
Donovan Smith may be a decent backup, but he really regressed last year once Ali Marpet retired. I wouldn't have high expectations for him.
|
Quote:
The risk is priced in. And that's IF he hits all his incentives. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But you also have an injury prone RT or a rookie. There are a LOT of question marks at OT and any one of them going south could give you a real problem. So...an incentive laden contract for a high pedigree younger veteran with a history of strong performance is hardly a poor decision. And hell, Taylor could be slow to transition to LT this season, be ready to do so next season and still prove to be a reasonable signing at LT long-term. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Something I wasn’t thinking about earlier. He was basically Rashaad Fenton, but at a more premium position. By that I mean: He doesn’t “suck” because he allows a ton of pressures and sacks. He “sucks” because he got a lot of penalties. Fenton didn’t suck because he allowed catches/yards/TD’s. He sucked because he got a lot of penalties. When viewing this from the lens of: “My primary goal is to eliminate injury risk for Patrick,” then Veach definitely got better in that department today. |
Quote:
|
ok! I like it, another lineman just in case things aren't looking too good at RT with Taylor at LT. Maybe this guy gets LT and Taylor stays at RT if he's looking good and Niang and a rookie aren't.
|
It's moves like this (and the subsequent reactions to them) that guarantee the Chargers to be offseason champs every single year.
|
Quote:
|
Always like to see the team get more protection for PMII.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.