Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17448408)

WE ARE NOT DRAFTING A WR IN THE FIRST ROUND

Our current LT is Wanya Morris. Yikes!

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17448478)

Michael Thomas has had ankle/foot injuries for years now and then suffered a knee injury last year. The guy is pretty much cooked. Hard pass.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 17448513)

Not really interested in him taking snaps from a rookie who needs to be ready to roll next year when Hollywood is gone.

Originally Posted by Zebedee DuBois (Post 17447908)

I am too old to understand the hip lingo these youngsters use these days, but I believe he was saying that he enjoyed his time in Baltimore, and wished they could have had more success together. He loved the city and his teammates and he will always look fondly upon his time together with them.

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 17448521)

A veteran to help coach up a shaky WR room at best, I would be okay with it for the right price. Try to trade up to get Brian Thomas Jr. and let those two LSU bros make each other better imo.

Originally Posted by ModSocks (Post 17448526)

Not a chance in hell. If they sign an OBJ it pretty much locks LT in as the pick in rnd 1.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17448531)

OBJ and Toney in the same locker room? No thanks.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17448527)

In reality we do need a consistent veteran in the WR room, not sure it's Beckham though.

Originally Posted by ModSocks (Post 17448534)

Brown, Watson. Rice in his 2nd year, Moore in his 3rd. I doubt the Chiefs view it as a concern.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17448531)

OBJ and Toney in the same locker room? No thanks.

Originally Posted by ModSocks (Post 17448526)

Not a chance in hell. If they sign an OBJ it pretty much locks LT in as the pick in rnd 1.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17448537)

Watson is not a consistent veteran, people really gotta stop putting him there, he's a WR 5/6. He's a solid depth piece because he can offer the ability to take some snaps.

Brown is closer to being a consistent vet but it'd be nice to have another since 3 WR's play all the time.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17448537)

Watson is not a consistent veteran, people really gotta stop putting him there, he's a WR 5/6. He's a solid depth piece because he can offer the ability to take some snaps.

Brown is closer to being a consistent vet but it'd be nice to have another since 3 WR's play all the time.

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 17448567)

Me and Franchise got mutual interest if you peep our DM's

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 17448564)

Watson seems to always have a really big chain moving, crucial catch every .8 games. Happy to have him as our 4th.

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 17448653)

I dont think he's a "chain-mover" per say, but he always seems to be the guy pulling in a tough 15 yard pass on 3rd and 13 that's contested and barely getting his feet in when the Chiefs desperately need to convert.

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17448686)

Do you really think he's the type to take a "discount"?

Originally Posted by MVChiefFan (Post 17448770)

I’m sorry, but in my opinion, Watson is the Daniel Sorensen of receivers. Occasionally comes up with a huge play, but for the most part he just isn’t very good.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 17449208)

I'd give him more credit that that.

I think Watson is a very solid no 4 WR. He's a good depth guy. The problem is when our coaching staff decides to start depth guys...

Originally Posted by MVChiefFan (Post 17448770)

I’m sorry, but in my opinion, Watson is the Daniel Sorensen of receivers. Occasionally comes up with a huge play, but for the most part he just isn’t very good.

Originally Posted by MVChiefFan (Post 17448770)

I’m sorry, but in my opinion, Watson is the Daniel Sorensen of receivers. Occasionally comes up with a huge play, but for the most part he just isn’t very good.

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17448283)

I'm not excited about it unless I hear it is at or under Hollywood's offer. 5m up to 7m with incentives would be about the max I'd want to see for him at this stage.

Originally Posted by 4th and Long (Post 17448003)

Watson had a higher yards per catch than OBJ last year (17 vs 16.5) and just as many TDs (3).

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 17449292)

Watson had Pat and OBJ had Lamar. OBJ would have had much higher numbers if he had Pat as his QB JUST for the sake he can actually consistently catch the ball.;)

Originally Posted by Rainbarrel (Post 17449304)

He'll get open like Brooke Pryor's cotton candy teddy

Originally Posted by nbkc fan (Post 17449333)

Is no one is focused on the Kardashian curse? They ruin anything they touch. Not sure why you would want her anywhere near the Chefs.

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 17449268)

I was going to say whatever Toney's cap hit is, offer him that and cut Toney. The bad news is OBJ ain't playing anywhere for 2.5 mil and change, and it would go all the way against our cap to cut Toney this year. Next year, Toney has a 14.4 mil cap number if we keep him, but nothing to release him (5th year option and all, I'm assuming).

Long story short - Toney is too cheap to cut to make room for OBJ, that will expect at least three times what Toney is going to cost us, not to mention eating the 2.5 mil to sign a guy to a 7-9 million dollar contract.

OBJ ain't coming here, and Toney ain't getting cut. Unfortunately.

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 17449519)

I just hope Toney can get his head right, because he’s a weapon if he does.

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17449300)

OBJ stands for Omelets Bacon and Juice.




Because just like breakfast, he's cooked.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17449550)

I don't want this selfish ****ing dude on my team.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449559)

I don’t want Kim Kardashian anywhere near KC.

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 17449519)

I just hope Toney can get his head right, because he’s a weapon if he does.

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17449565)

Broke dick players always disappoint. :doh!:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449559)

I don’t want Kim Kardashian anywhere near KC.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449559)

I don’t want Kim Kardashian anywhere near KC.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449559)

I don’t want Kim Kardashian anywhere near KC.

Originally Posted by arrowheadnation (Post 17449573)

THIS! I’m telling you we don’t f’ing need all of the damn gossip mags and paparazzi from all over the world setting up outposts in Kansas City drumming up drama between her and Swift while we’re trying to go for 3 in a row.

For those that don’t know (and someone might need to clarify), Taylor Swift absolutely despises Kim K. It stems from a phone call her and Kanye made to Taylor so Kanye could ask her if she was ok with a somewhat naughty lyric about her that he wanted to include in a song (she (Taylor) owes me sex), to which Taylor agreed. Fast forward to the actual release and the line was totally different (I made that b!tch famous) and Taylor got pissed. Then it turned out that Kim had been recording the phone call and they released an edited version showing Taylor agreeing to the new lyric and she faced a shitstorm of finger pointing from people calling her a liar until the truth inevitably came out.

So no, we do not need nor want a Kardashian in KC.

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 17449574)

This fat ass trend hasn't ended?

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17449649)

Not everyone likes a meth head, grandpa.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17449663)

To be fair, the BBL trend is absolutely ****ing terrible.

Diaper booties are not nice like natural fat asses.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17449649)

Not everyone likes a meth head, grandpa.

Originally Posted by KCJake (Post 17450012)

Well this thread took a turn ..

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17450018)

There's absolutely nothing like a natural round ass.

I think I'd rather have no ass than a BBL though.

Honestly, not even really a fan of fake tits, but they're ok.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17449649)

Not everyone likes a meth head, grandpa.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17449688)

I agree but he just commented about fat asses.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449653)

My not wanting Kim Kardashian in Kansas City has nothing to do with the Chiefs.

I just think she's a walking piece of excrement who is largely responsible for body positivity / insecurity issues for an entire generation of women. She is fake as ****, will breed with any athlete with a swinging dick and money, and is literally only famous because she made a sex tape.

She is a piece of shit.

A city full of good that is on a roll and headed in a very positive direction does not need a metaphorical train derailment by the likes of KK.

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 17450595)

Cry more little boy:deevee:

I think Fran is a good name for you. You post like a Fran.

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 17450623)

Interesting that you would use the phrase ‘little boy’ in a conversation about your preference for ass. I’ll chalk that up to a Freudian slip.

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 17450623)

Interesting that you would use the phrase ‘little boy’ in a conversation about your preference for ass. I’ll chalk that up to a Freudian slip.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 17449653)

My not wanting Kim Kardashian in Kansas City has nothing to do with the Chiefs.

I just think she's a walking piece of excrement who is largely responsible for body positivity / insecurity issues for an entire generation of women. She is fake as ****, will breed with any athlete with a swinging dick and money, and is literally only famous because she made a sex tape.

She is a piece of shit.

A city full of good that is on a roll and headed in a very positive direction does not need a metaphorical train derailment by the likes of KK.