![]() |
I don't understand why some of these teams who are just terrible and out of it.....why wouldn't you start siphoning off anything not nailed down?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
*ducks* |
Me thinks Hollywood may be back sooner than we think.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nah, Sneed ain't coming back.
I really think it would likely be a DE. You just can't have enough pass rushers. |
Quote:
|
its a CB
|
Quote:
They need some pieces there IMO. CB is another spot I'd look at. Just a pure pass rusher that can really bend the edge would be nice. |
Quote:
|
Hollywood is coming back. We're done at WR.
|
Quote:
Didn’t the Royals beat his ass in the 2015 WS? |
I read a few weeks back that a player can't be traded back to his old team for two years. It was Ian Rapoport so I'd say its solid.
|
What in the world made TN think trading and paying Sneed was a good idea? Did they really think they were a SB contender?
|
I say Azeez Ojulari from the NYG... **** it. That's my call
|
Quote:
Hopkins is a near perfect fit though. All things considered. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
PBJ |
Quote:
|
Veach wanted Zadarius Smith, maybe he still does!
Lightens the load on the secondary and improves the pass rush all at the same time! Improving two positions with one addition... |
So none of us really believe that quote from Veach about not being interested in another trade, right? Me neither.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dunno. But after the Hopkins deal, well, "fool me once . . ." |
Damn. Stafford, Kupp, and D Rob looking sharp out there tonight. Rams really gonna blow this up?
|
Quote:
|
Come on, Burnt Vag.
|
Quote:
The injury bug is still giving me pause. The entire league is losing offensive players like crazy this year. Whenever one of our guys gets hit I cringe because I expect the worst |
I wouldn't mind some extra help at corner. Nazeeh Johnson didnt impress too much against SF and he wasn't up against anything special.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bring in Myles Garrett. That combo with jones gets you a Super Bowl on its own.
|
Why would we acquire a non-elite DE?
The Chiefs DE rotation, by December, will be Karlaftis/Omenihu/Danna/FAU. That's a fine rotation. Bringing on a DE means you're likely benching FAU so your unnamed veteran can play 15 snaps a game, which isn't necessary given that he's playing acceptably. We have the fifth-highest pressure rate in the NFL. If they're making a serious acquisition, it's got to be an offensive skill position or CB. Those are the last remaining spots on this roster where there are a lot of snaps to fill and minimally talented guys to bench. Edit: Left tackle as well. |
Lattimore would make sense, depending on cost.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If the Chiefs wanted Donovan Smith, he'd be here already.
|
Quote:
Danna has a pec injury and we know what happened with Thuney last year. We've gotten nothing from Cameron Thomas so far. Depth is a bit of a concern right now. I'd take a pinch hitter that can go get the QB on 3rd downs especially given we're what, 4th-lowest in sacks? |
Quote:
Andy isn't messing with the OL. He never has, unless injury or a guy is just catastrophic. |
Quote:
Apparently, he has a 18%+ Pressure Rating and could be available via trade to make a play or two for us down the stretch. Not sure he’d cost us all that cap space tho |
Yep. Pretty clear they have absolutely no interest in Donovan Smith.
|
The way I see it, obviously isn't gonna hurt if they add to any one of WR, OT, DE, or CB.
But even before an addition, the only thing that can stop this team is injury. So which spot is most vulnerable? At which spot would a single injury to a single player most crater their title hopes? It's tough but think I'd go: 1) OT 2) CB 3) WR 4) DE I think they're gonna take their chances at OL though because if they felt bad about the pups and their trajectory, yeah, Donovan would be here already. |
Quote:
|
They're not bringing in an OT guys, unless someone goes down. Andy doesn't do that with the OL.
It's a dead end talking point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm thinking about January. By January, with no further injury surprises, we're rolling 4 deep at DE, 5 deep if you include Herring. |
After last nights performance, I think you have to seriously consider DRob.
|
Quote:
I seriously view them as NFC West favorites again. |
The Rams aren't trading Robinson.
|
And Cleveland isn't trading Myles Garrett, are you guys on crack?
|
Quote:
He made some plays, and was pretty good at those inside slants. He was A+ excellent at ad-libbing when Mahomes scrambled. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And after this Sunday Max Crosby will show us if we can stand pat at OT. If we get an injury later on in the year that of course would be another matter, but we could always bring in Smith then. After Sunday, the OT priority will be better known. I think the Latimer option at corner would be really great and certainly worth the Tennessee third round pick we got for Snead . If the information that’s been posted is correct he would definitely be affordable this year, but probably only a rental for our three peat. I guess another factor to consider is what do we need to make sure we beat Baltimore. I think we were quite lucky in that first game and I’m not talking about the toe. I think many of us didn’t think that Jackson and Henry would be able to work together very well and in that first game the ravens hadn’t figured out how to make that work. But they have now. I know we all believe we can count on Lamar to choke, so we get the win, but I have become increasingly worried about them. Not sure who we could add in a trade that would help here as it would probably have to be a very good player and I don’t know if we can afford that or would want to pay the price. So I think they will wait until what the Raiders show us on Sunday and then decide if they need to go after OT help or probably DB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And he has those games like last night. All of the sudden he blows up and looks like a top 10-20 wide receiver in the NFL. Now he will disappear like a fart in the wind. At least he used to when he played for KC. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You guys say that, but if you were the Browns why wouldn't you listen on Garrett?
He's 29 and by the time you get good again, he's gonna be aged out. I'd imagine the starting price would be 2 1's, why wouldn't you take that? |
So Hill, Lattimore, and Garrett people are suggesting ROFL
I stick by my assessment. Madden and fantasy football rots brains. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Listening" on Myles Garrett starts at so are you gonna give me 2 1's plus a bunch of other shit. Also people don't really talk about this but because of Watson's injury they can recoup quite a bit of his money on their salary cap so now would be a great time for them to just go with a rookie QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Lattimore makes sense. Great corner - cheap cost - we need one
|
Quote:
He's nearing 30 and again, they're 3 years away from being competitive. |
Quote:
I also don't buy they are 3 years away, they overall have a good roster, they are in a good spot to drop in a rookie QB. |
Quote:
So yeah, they're gonna be terrible next year, probably year after too. |
IIRC, they have a portion of it insured, so they could get some relief on it.
|
Same thing if I were the Raiders, I'd be moving Crosby if I could.
|
|
Quote:
It's not as bad as it looks, Brett Kollman did a whole piece on it last week. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
GMs don't care to get fired to help the next guy
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.