ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Cardinals Cardinals vs. Chicago at Wrigley Field Weekend Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=188735)

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 4904317)
Soriano gets so many assists because he's challenged so much. Can you disagree with that? Is there anyone who gets run on more often than Soriano? (Discounting Chris Duncan.)

And yes, Harden is one of the top pitchers in the league, but no way is he *arguably* the best in the majors. He's not even the best pitcher on your team, although he's far and away the best #2 in baseball.

Harden is an unbelievable pitcher...he was like that with the A's...he's just extremely injury prone. When he's healthy, there is NO doubt he is better than Big Z...but Big Z is never hurt...

Would I choose Big Z over Harden? Yes, 100 times out of 100...if they are both healthy and I need one to start a must win game...Harden. (With Big Z coming out the pen, of course)...

Harden is up there with guys like Santana, Peavy, Webb, Haren, Sabathia, that, when he's on, he's unhittable. And he's a strikeout machine.

'Hamas' Jenkins 08-09-2008 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 4904305)
I gave you a scenario...

Cubs: 100-62
Cardinals: 97-60

which one would you choose? Would you keep it that way, or would you swap? Or are you not going to answer? Or are you going to give me the 'law of averages' bullshit...

If law of averages held true in baseball, when it mattered, the Cardinals would've been swept a few years ago rather than winning the worst World Series I've ever seen.

It's statistically insignificant which one I choose, though, as you've presented a classic gambler's fallacy.

BigRedChief 08-09-2008 05:44 PM

Hootie, WTF!
Royals players are better than the Cardinal players?ROFL

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 4904317)
Soriano gets so many assists because he's challenged so much. Can you disagree with that? Is there anyone who gets run on more often than Soriano? (Discounting Chris Duncan.)

And yes, Harden is one of the top pitchers in the league, but no way is he *arguably* the best in the majors. He's not even the best pitcher on your team, although he's far and away the best #2 in baseball.

He's challenged so much because his zone rating is awful...he misplays a ball a game it seems...

If he caught everything in site and got a good jump here and there, his assists would go down, duh.

All I said, from the very beginning was...he's a lousy fielder (one of the worst) with a great outfield arm. And that's 100% true.

Jewish Rabbi 08-09-2008 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 4904322)
Harden is an unbelievable pitcher...he was like that with the A's...he's just extremely injury prone. When he's healthy, there is NO doubt he is better than Big Z...but Big Z is never hurt...

Would I choose Big Z over Harden? Yes, 100 times out of 100...if they are both healthy and I need one to start a must win game...Harden. (With Big Z coming out the pen, of course)...

Harden is up there with guys like Santana, Peavy, Webb, Haren, Sabathia, that, when he's on, he's unhittable. And he's a strikeout machine.

When Anthony Reyes was on he was unhittable. If you're gonna go with that bullshit, Carpenter belongs in that category *gasp* when healthy.

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 4904324)
It's statistically insignificant which one I choose, though, as you've presented a classic gambler's fallacy.

LMAO!

As a fan, as a FAN of a team...you'd choose to have your team choose their destiny...any fan would...without a doubt...take the 97 win team. 100 times out of 100.

You can't answer because you know that, when it comes down to it, and everyone is figuring out who needs to win what to get into the postseason...the loss column becomes more important than the games back column.

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 4904330)
When Anthony Reyes was on he was unhittable. If you're gonna go with that bullshit, Carpenter belongs in that category *gasp* when healthy.

Yeah, you can lump Carpenter in with the elite, he won a Cy Young for god's sake...

There are about 15 pitchers who are truly elite, if not a few more...and Harden is one of them.

Jewish Rabbi 08-09-2008 05:47 PM

Look, I found Hootie on YouTube!!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CcQkRrUV0Hk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CcQkRrUV0Hk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:48 PM

great, now the n00b is posting youtube videos that will make no one laugh.

Seriously, hamas, if you care about this kid PM him and tell him to stop making himself look like a moron with his 2002 message board antics...seriously. I feel like I should be in high school again.

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 4904326)
Hootie, WTF!
Royals players are better than the Cardinal players?ROFL

An exaggeration...swap Pujols and Teahan and I'm taking the Royals though!

'Hamas' Jenkins 08-09-2008 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 4904322)
Harden is an unbelievable pitcher...he was like that with the A's...he's just extremely injury prone. When he's healthy, there is NO doubt he is better than Big Z...but Big Z is never hurt...

Would I choose Big Z over Harden? Yes, 100 times out of 100...if they are both healthy and I need one to start a must win game...Harden. (With Big Z coming out the pen, of course)...

Harden is up there with guys like Santana, Peavy, Webb, Haren, Sabathia, that, when he's on, he's unhittable. And he's a strikeout machine.

And if he could stay healthy, he'd be Tim Lincecum.

'Hamas' Jenkins 08-09-2008 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 4904332)
LMAO!

As a fan, as a FAN of a team...you'd choose to have your team choose their destiny...any fan would...without a doubt...take the 97 win team. 100 times out of 100.

You can't answer because you know that, when it comes down to it, and everyone is figuring out who needs to win what to get into the postseason...the loss column becomes more important than the games back column.

You all play the same number of games and there are no ties. It means nothing.

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 4904342)
And if he could stay healthy, he'd be Tim Lincecum.

I love Lincecum...lost me money his first game up last year against Cole Hamels...I bet the under at 7.5...thought it was a lock. The game was 4-4 after 3 innings...

He's one of my favorites...him and Volquez...and I've been on the Josh Hamilton bandwagon before the homerun derby made him everyones favorite player :rolleyes:

BigRedChief 08-09-2008 05:51 PM

Hootie,

You can blow hard, yell, scream all you want to how your team is the best in baseball. And they may be but the team has a history of folding under pressure.

For crissakes you won the division last year and lost 3 strraight playoff games and went home. You play how many more games this year against the Bucks and Cards? You finish with 16 out of 22 road games. I wouldn't be thinking its a done deal that you will be raising that WS trophy at Wrigley yet pal.

Hootie 08-09-2008 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 4904345)
You all play the same number of games and there are no ties. It means nothing.

Why are you trying to put a spin on the scenario? It's stupid...

If you had a choice between the two, you'd take the 97 wins and choose your own destiny...you know it, I know it, it's common sense.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.