ChiefsPlanet
Page 30 of 52 « First 2026272829 30 3132333440 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sanchez? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216506)

OnTheWarpath15 10-18-2009 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6186269)
Because it's ****ing annoying to ask someone to comb through 6 months of threads to comb through the exact page on a 100 page thread to figure out the exact moment Sanchez's name was mentioned in the context of a Sanchez vs. Cassel comparison.

I've said the shit flinging has gone both ways. Do you really believe that the pro Sanchez supporters for 6 months have been baited every single time by the anti Sanchez crowd? I've never even said one's more to blame than the other. I think it's annoying from both sides of the spectrum.
Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

OnTheWarpath15 10-18-2009 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6186288)
And history proves that drafting QBs with the amount of experience that Sanchez has never pays off either.
Huge sample size you're working with there.

It's happened, what, once, before Sanchez?

dirk digler 10-18-2009 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6186257)
that's pretty much it...Pioli liked how he waited behind good qb's and then took the reigns when he finally had the chance..dude got hit almost forty times last week..he's a fighter.

what's funny is the immediate success/dailure rate imposed on both qb's..both have just become starting qb's.... both paths will have ups and downs...six games, good or bad, don't tell us squat..most of this fervor is wasted energy.
I agree and I think this whole argument is stupid and a waste of time and bandwidth.

That stat line I heard about Cassel getting hit on like 95% of his passes is just crazy. Not many QB's could handle the punishment that he has received.

ChiefsCountry 10-18-2009 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6186284)
Pretty unfair to call a guy a career backup because he backed up the best QB in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers was a career backup until last year too.
WTF, he never played in college either. It is what he is, a career backup until Pollard ****ed up last year.

doomy3 10-18-2009 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6186289)
Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.
This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.

doomy3 10-18-2009 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6186292)
Huge sample size you're working with there.

It's happened, what, once, before Sanchez?
Don't be so obtuse.

Surely you can draw the reference to other junior QBs who came out. You are right though, Sanchez did have even less experience than them.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-18-2009 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6186300)
This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.
There have been several. Otter started one a few weeks ago that I remember specifically.

Marcellus 10-18-2009 08:52 PM
[QUOTE=doomy3;6186300

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.[/QUOTE]

This is the big picture.

splatbass 10-18-2009 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6186289)
Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.
I don't think he is talking about STARTING threads. He is talking about posts within threads.

doomy3 10-18-2009 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6186308)
There have been several. Otter started one a few weeks ago that I remember specifically.
Cool, I haven't been on here much lately, because I am tired of reading the same bullshit in every single thread. I must have missed Otter's thread.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-18-2009 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6186316)
Cool, I haven't been on here much lately, because I am tired of reading the same bullshit in every single thread. I must have missed Otter's thread.
You're a wiser man than I am, Gunga Din.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 10-18-2009 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6186289)
Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.
This is true for the most part, though I do think there is some Pioli baiting that goes around

tonyetony 10-18-2009 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6186289)
Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.
Funny how you know exactly who the Sanchez lovers are without being asked.

Saccopoo 10-18-2009 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6186276)
While history says that Cassel won't win a Super Bowl for us, I hope to hell he sure proves us wrong. I just think trading for a career backup was the wrong move and history proves it is.
First off, what "history" is this that says that Cassel won't win a Super Bowl or that this "history" proves that trading for a backup was a wrong move? Especially considering that we got a perennial Pro Bowl linebacker along with our starting QB. I'm a little confused as to how you think that this was a wrong move, especially basing it on a "historical" perspective.

Actually, watching our second round pick this year (Cassel and Vrabel), I don't see how the trade was anything but a very good to excellent move at the least. It gave the team the opportunity to be more competitive on both sides of the ball sooner rather than later. As well, while not the most flashy of picks, it looks like the Jackson pick was solid, considering the near night and day difference in the run defense from last season to this one. At the end of last season, it might have been a toss up between which was worse - the O line or the D line.

OnTheWarpath15 10-18-2009 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6186300)
This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.


http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

And one from....you.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.
Page 30 of 52 « First 2026272829 30 3132333440 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.