ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs reached agreement in principle on deal with former Saints QB Chase Daniel (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271044)

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9491743)
people play the "mentorship" card a lot more than it needs to be played.

drew brees doesn't "mentor" chase daniel. drew brees works on his own game and gets his timing down with this wr's and Oline because he's the starting Qb.

this is a misconception that many fans have. Just because one guy was a backup behind someone that is great, doesn't mean that guy will pick up his game and imitate him.

Most players will tell you that you have to be your own guy. Rodgers will tell you that Favre didn't help him do shit. If he had a question or wanted to talk about certain things they would, because they're teammates, but the "mentor" card gets played waaaaaay too often.

LMAO

Chase Daniel was around Drew Brees every single day for four years. Whether or not there's intentional mentoring, Daniel, as a undrafted free agent, learned how to prepare from one of the best QB's in the game and from some of the best (if not THE best in Payton) coaches in the game.

Discuss Thrower 03-12-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491755)
LMAO

Chase Daniel was around Drew Brees every single day for four years. Whether or not there's intentional mentoring, Daniel, as a undrafted free agent, learned how to prepare from one of the best QB's in the game and from some of the best (if not THE best in Payton) coaches in the game.

And Matt Cassel was tutored by Carson Palmer AND Tom Brady, so what?

boogblaster 03-12-2013 11:02 PM

here we go .. too where .....

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9491775)
And Matt Cassel was tutored by Carson Palmer AND Tom Brady, so what?


I'd have a bigger issue if Chase Daniel was signed to start.

He wasn't.

If Daniel can come off the bench occasionally and win some games, like Feeley, Garcia, etc., it'll have been a great move.

Hopefully, he never sees the field.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-12-2013 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9491444)
Joeckel, is going to be a better pro than Geno Smith.

At least Andy thinks so.

Around here, we dont "trust the process", and we dont give a **** what Carl, Marty, Scott, John or Andy ****ing THINK. So PLEASE; get that through your thick ****ing skull, and stop posting stupid comments like that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Discuss Thrower 03-12-2013 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491800)
I'd have a bigger issue if Chase Daniel was signed to start.

He wasn't.

If Daniel can come off the bench occasionally and win some games, like Feeley, Garcia, etc., it'll have been a great move.

Hopefully, he never sees the field.

The problem isnt he wasnt signed to start, it's that he's signed to be a 'project' guy who is a backup and therefore reason enough not to draft a legit prospect QB in the next 3 years.

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9491802)
Around here, we dont "trust the process", and we dont give a **** what Carl, Marty, Scott, John or Andy ****ing THINK. So PLEASE; get that through your thick ****ing skull, and stop posting stupid comments like that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Who's "We"?

I called out Pioli and Haley as frauds in early 2009. But I believe in giving Reid and Dorsey some time to reshape this roster and put a plan in place because the Chiefs have been an epic cluster**** since 2005.

It's funny how 99.999999% of this forum was all for giving Pioli a "pass" for 2009, making all kinds of excuses for his shit moves such as Cassel, Toomer, Goof, Thomas, etc. and so on.

Yet, the new GM that's spent the past 21 years in Green Bay and a man who coached his team to five consecutive NFC Championships and a Super Bowl are already considered morons just a few weeks into their tenure.

It makes no ****ing sense.

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9491812)
The problem isnt he wasnt signed to start, it's that he's signed to be a 'project' guy who is a backup and therefore reason enough not to draft a legit prospect QB in the next 3 years.

Sorry, I don't buy that, at all.

You're projecting.

RyFo18 03-12-2013 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9491812)
The problem isnt he wasnt signed to start, it's that he's signed to be a 'project' guy who is a backup and therefore reason enough not to draft a legit prospect QB in the next 3 years.

You're overrating the 'project' guy.

I'm getting this quote wrong but it's something to the effect that 90 or so quarterbacks have been selected in the 3rd round or later in the last 10 years and only Russell Wilson is starting for the team that drafted him.

Chiefs_Mike_Topeka 03-12-2013 11:12 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Awesome. Get to see a backwards hat wearing douchebag eat his boogers on the sideline. And if he ever does get in game watch him put everything he's got into a 5 yard out and swing pass Charles into early retirement.

Ohh, and lets hope Tebow doesn't come to KC just to avoid Daniel trying to kiss on him.

Discuss Thrower 03-12-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491818)
Sorry, I don't buy that, at all.

You're projecting.

In relation to your feelings about Dorsey, then why trade for Alex Smith when you could get the same type of player, for all intents and purposes, in a Matt Moore or David Garrard?

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9491834)
In relation to your feelings about Dorsey, then why trade for Alex Smith when you could get the same type of player, for all intents and purposes, in a Matt Moore or David Garrard?

Matt Moore wasn't available and David Garrard hasn't played in the NFL since 2010 and is 34 years old.

You know, the league year just started today and there's seven weeks until the draft. I think there's a very good chance that the Chiefs trade out of #1, pick up additional choices this year and next, which will "ease the pain" of the people that feel like the #34 was too much to give up for Alex Smith.

Plus, if he actually wins something, all will be quickly forgotten.

Mav 03-12-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9491834)
In relation to your feelings about Dorsey, then why trade for Alex Smith when you could get the same type of player, for all intents and purposes, in a Matt Moore or David Garrard?

David Garrard just signed on as the back up to mark sanchez.

Matt Moore just reupped to back up with the phins.

The draft class is super weak at qb, the free agent qb class is weak as hell.

There are at least 5 teams that need to upgrade at qb, and none thought those two were worth shit.

Im not sure if its more people underrating alex smith, or overrating these scrub ass qbs.......

crazycoffey 03-12-2013 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9491802)
Around here, we dont "trust the process", and we dont give a **** what Carl, Marty, Scott, John or Andy ****ing THINK. So PLEASE; get that through your thick ****ing skull, and stop posting stupid comments like that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Of course the alternate is to believe you have the answers? STFU

Discuss Thrower 03-12-2013 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491842)
Matt Moore wasn't available and David Garrard hasn't played in the NFL since 2010 and is 34 years old.

You know, the league year just started today and there's seven weeks until the draft. I think there's a very good chance that the Chiefs trade out of #1, pick up additional choices this year and next, which will "ease the pain" of the people that feel like the #34 was too much to give up for Alex Smith.

Plus, if he actually wins something, all will be quickly forgotten.

Those wins could be as few as 14 ofer the next 2 years (ON par with Cassel) or it could be as many as 20 with two playoff appearances and zero wins to show for it.

A 1st round QB can just as likely get you to either of those watermarks as Alex Smith.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.