ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs We need to extend Alex Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280391)

Rausch 01-08-2014 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356763)
and Smith didn't get it done. If he did I'd concede I was wrong.

I'm throwing the BS flag.

There is never, ever, EVER a time 44 pts shouldn't be enough...

DeezNutz 01-08-2014 10:23 PM

If one wanted to be cautious, start next season and see how he performs over the first four games. If it's abundantly clear that his playoff performance is roughly how he's going to play moving forward--I say "roughly" because it's grossly unfair to expect quite that same level of excellence continually--then be prepared to pay even more and get the deal done in-season.

If he regresses to his play in early '13, however, then caution would result in, likely, a bit of savings.

Tribal Warfare 01-08-2014 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10356765)
I'm throwing the BS flag.

There is never, ever, EVER a time 44 pts shouldn't be enough...

He had a chance to seal it like a Brady/Manning showdown.

The Bad Guy 01-08-2014 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10356622)
And evidence points to him not getting to close to the numbers he did in the playoff game with all of those pieces around him anyway.

I care about wins. Those numbers in the playoff game were incredible, but I want wins. He's shown that he can do that. It was one game, but it erased pretty much every doubt I had about him. He played his best game ever on the biggest stage without his biggest weapon.

I also don't see why he couldn't post really good numbers with improved receivers.

I don't buy for a second he's going to get a 6 year extension worth 100 million. I think it's going to be a 3 year extension in the high 40 million dollar range that will either be spread out for cap purposes with a few extra fluff years (see Cutler) or be around 6 for 85-90 with an out after 2-3 years.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2014 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356769)
He had a chance to seal it like a Brady/Manning showdown.

And at this point you need to realize that Brady or Manning lost that game...

Rausch 01-08-2014 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356769)
He had a chance to seal it like a Brady/Manning showdown.

Listen to yourself.

Ok, we had a chance for our D to prevent them from scoring like a DT/Smith/Hasty showdown.

Did they do it?

Did any defensive player decide to take the game over in the 2nd half?

No...

The Bad Guy 01-08-2014 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356769)
He had a chance to seal it like a Brady/Manning showdown.

You are bar none the worst poster on this site. You're a full of shit blowhard who constantly posts garbage that's so off the mark that it's embarrassing.

Clay has his warts, but he'll admit when he's been wrong. You offer nothing close to that.

Fist yourself, dbag.

Easy 6 01-08-2014 10:27 PM

Rausch, you bigass redheaded German, which one is it, define it once and for all... is Smith worthwhile or is he garbage... we need to know for sure.

Smitty's performance against the Colts was weak sauce or what? The same weakass Colts defense that beat the Niners on the road or who beat the Broncos or Seahawks?... quit riding the fence and get on Teh Ship... Smith did everything necessary to win against a defense that beat Kaep, Manning and Wilson.

What else do you need?

Ed* my tippling may have made me see your posts in the wrong light, forgive or dont... DA HUUUS GAH

The Bad Guy 01-08-2014 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356763)
and Smith didn't get it done. If he did I'd concede I was wrong.

Of course you are wrong you shitbag. You're always wrong.

Tribal Warfare 01-08-2014 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10356774)
And at this point you need to realize that Brady or Manning lost that game...

My point is in the NFL presently you HAVE to win those track meets if shit happens. Alex blew his chance

Tribal Warfare 01-08-2014 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10356775)
Listen to yourself.

Ok, we had a chance for our D to prevent them from scoring like a DT/Smith/Hasty showdown.

Did they do it?

Did any defensive player decide to take the game over in the 2nd half?

No...

Yeah, again my point stands

The Bad Guy 01-08-2014 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356783)
My point is in the NFL presently you HAVE to win those track meets if shit happens. Alex blew his chance

No one gives a **** what you have to say.

Rausch 01-08-2014 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356783)
My point is in the NFL presently you HAVE to win those track meets if shit happens. Alex blew his chance

No, he took the most of his opportunities and his team let him down.

He beasted.

I'm not ready to crown him, but, on a one game basis, I'd crown his ass.

Our defense COMPLETELY let us down.

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2014 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10356758)
Respectfully, bow out of this conversation...

LOL I don't think he's Bono. Tribal compared him to Bono early in the season.

kcpasco 01-08-2014 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10356783)
My point is in the NFL presently you HAVE to win those track meets if shit happens. Alex blew his chance

Reid has some responsibility in that. He was calling screen passes all the 2nd half instead of deep passes.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.