ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Gas on the Fire: Shutdown Corner Gives Chiefs "F" in FA. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282806)

Direckshun 04-06-2014 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544496)
Holy ****ing hell.

SPENDING MORE MONEY DOES NOT MAGICALLY CREATE MONEY THAT DOESN'T COUNT AGAINST THE CAP. HOLY ****ING HELL.

Where is this magical, mystical forest where NFL teams are illegally spending money on players that never counts against the cap. Tell me a single way that a team spends a single dollar on a player that doesn't count against the cap.

LMAO LMAO LMAO

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10544500)
LMAO LMAO LMAO

Granted, I don't know what happens in back rooms. Maybe NFL teams are giving BJs to players as an extra perk for signing. But I doubt it, because Kerry Rhodes is still unemployed. Apart from that, this idea that teams are loading up on signing bonuses as a way to cheat the cap by illegally paying players for money that somehow never hits the cap is ridiculous. Yet it keeps getting brought up and people nod their heads in agreement.

Hammock Parties 04-06-2014 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544496)
Holy ****ing hell.

SPENDING MORE MONEY DOES NOT MAGICALLY CREATE MONEY THAT DOESN'T COUNT AGAINST THE CAP. HOLY ****ING HELL.

Where is this magical, mystical forest where NFL teams are illegally spending money on players that never counts against the cap. Tell me a single way that a team spends a single dollar on a player that doesn't count against the cap.

You either don't get it, or refuse to.

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2014 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Douche Baggins (Post 10544522)
You either don't get it, or refuse to.

You've never answered my question.

Name me a single dollar that gets paid to a player that doesn't account against the cap (legally)

O.city 04-06-2014 07:23 PM

Where is this "free money" coming from? Who's saying anything about it not hitting the cap?

Jesus. Big signing bonus leads to a lower cap hit in a year we don't have a lot of funds, cap wise.

Hammock Parties 04-06-2014 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544530)
You've never answered my question.

It doesn't require one.

Direckshun 04-06-2014 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544518)
Granted, I don't know what happens in back rooms. Maybe NFL teams are giving BJs to players as an extra perk for signing. But I doubt it, because Kerry Rhodes is still unemployed.

ROFL

O.city 04-06-2014 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544530)
You've never answered my question.

Name me a single dollar that gets paid to a player that doesn't account against the cap (legally)

Who is saying anything like this?

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2014 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10544533)
Where is this "free money" coming from? Who's saying anything about it not hitting the cap?

Jesus. Big signing bonus leads to a lower cap hit in a year we don't have a lot of funds, cap wise.

That has nothing to do with calling a team cheap or suggesting that the Chiefs won't pay big signing bonuses because they don't want to spend money on players. Or bringing up Denver as an example of a team that is magically dodging the cap by somehow paying players in a way that doesn't eventually hit the cap. That is disagreeing with the way the Chiefs manage their cap. That's fair.

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2014 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Douche Baggins (Post 10544540)
It doesn't require one.

You called the Chiefs cheap. If a team is hitting against the salary cap in consecutive years, how is that being cheap?

TEX 04-06-2014 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10544558)
You called the Chiefs cheap. If a team is hitting against the salary cap in consecutive years, how is that being cheap?

CASH FLOW. So many have explained it to you, but you dont want to listen. Like I told you before, if you're not going to listen to anyone, then just talk to yourself but DONT believe your answers...Holy shit dude, what are you smoking??? :bong:

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2014 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10544577)
CASH FLOW. So many have explained it to you, but you dont want to listen. Like I told you before, if you're not going to listen to anyone, then just talk to yourself but DONT believe your answers...Holy shit dude, what are you smoking??? :bong:

If I spend $150,000 today and $50,000 tomorrow, I spent $200,000 over two years. That is the same damn thing as spending $100,000 over 2 years. You spent the same money. Agree or disagree with the way you spent it. But to suggest one way is cheap and the other isn't, that's where the argument becomes ridiculous. This has everything to do with disagreeing with how we manage the cap. It's

htismaqe 04-06-2014 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10544366)
What did the Raiders give up for Palmer?

What did the Redskins give up for Bobby Griffin?

What did the Cardinals give up for Kevin Kolb?

And you think that we overpaid for Smith with two lousy seconds?

http://content.wheresweed.com/blog_i...m-bong-hit.gif

There's sure is a shitload of success in that list. I feel better!

Messier 04-06-2014 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10544626)
There's sure is a shitload of success in that list. I feel better!

Take comfort in the fact that you don't care.

O.city 04-06-2014 08:10 PM

Does it bother you that much?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.