![]() |
Quote:
|
The Combine is such a minuscule piece of the evaluation puzzle that I think it will have a relatively minimal effect. Primarily, it's a chance for teams to do medicals and interviews. They are getting the interview segment remotely.
I think the most critical portion is that players with medical issues won't be thoroughly evaluated and this will cause them to fall much further than they otherwise would. The underwear Olympics segment doesn't matter that much, it generally just confirms what their trained eyes see on tape and makes a very modest impact on overall evaluation. Sure, you get the occasional surprise one way or the other but not to the extent it will send many players up or down the board. |
Quote:
|
Not posting because I want the guy. Posting for the statement.
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Chargers are "actively shopping" G Trai Turner. There's a terrific chance he's simply released if the team can't find a suitor. Turner, 27, was acquired from the Panthers in exchange for OT Russell Okung last offseason but mustered only nine appearances with the Chargers (after previously playing 84 games in Carolina) due to a number of significant injuries experienced mid-year. With Kevin Zeitler's and Andrew Norwell's names recently cropping up as additional available options, the market is expected to be flooded with talented offensive linemen seeking fresh starts. Turner is due $11 million in base salary in 2021. |
Quote:
Not only do teams get to measure each player accurately in terms of height, weight, vision and health, they're also allowed to spend time with these players, which is extremely valuable in determining who's a fit for the lockerroom while eliminating guys that aren't a fit. Also, the 40 time is extremely important, especially for guys that played in weak conference or FCS schools, which is why we see guys rise up the draft board every single year. Sure, they can make some evaluations on Pro Days but the most important aspect of The Combine is the level playing field. No one player has an advantage over another like they would at Pro Days, where guys are in a familiar environment. The on field drills are also important, especially for Wide Receivers, because they're all being tested by the same guy throwing the ball, as well as doing it on the same exact field. |
Quote:
1) I mentioned medical evaluation as the critical component of the combine. 2) Interviews are still happening, they just are happening via Zoom/WebEx and the like, so that component doesn't get erased. 3) Only a handful of players rise up boards due to running well in underwear. It's not that critical. Are teams going to somehow miss out on the next great player in the NFL because a guy couldn't run at a combine? Doubtful. 4) Your argument that 40-time is important doesn't hold up against what is said by a lot of people in the field. It's one of the least important tests at the combine. That and the bench press. Teams are more concerned with agility drills and jumps to show change of direction and explosive power. The 40 generally proves a guy is fast or slow, and not that they are marginally faster or slower than thought. When you do get those surprises, the handful a year where you thought they were a 4.5 guy and they are a 4.3 guy, then you have to go back to the tape. That said, if a guy looks 4.5 on tape and runs a 4.3, then you have to question his mental processing speed as the issue of why he plays slower than he times. 5) Drills are not case critical either. While they serve as an additional verification tool, you still have done the primary evaluation. The primary evaluation is always done by the scouts 1st and re-watching tape 2nd. I'd argue in your favor for players that were injured. The drills walk hand-in-hand with medicals for players coming back from injury. I'd sure want to see how Walker Little moves at this point, for example. Not that I still wouldn't draft him, but it might mean a difference in 2-3 rounds. |
Quote:
Quote:
It's not the same. Quote:
The reverse is also true. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Veach offseason better be extending Tyreek
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chargers CB Chris Harris Jr. says Tyreek Hill is the best receiver in the NFL right now:<br><br>"Being able to do it all: take the top off, catch the ball routes, and take 'em 60. So right now, I'd say Tyreek Hill is probably the best receiver."<a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisHarrisJr?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ChrisHarrisJr</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cheetah?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cheetah</a> <a href="https://t.co/jqAocSDKq5">pic.twitter.com/jqAocSDKq5</a></p>— CBS Sports Network (@CBSSportsNet) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSSportsNet/status/1367984074107850755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
There were quite a few people here that felt Justin Britt had either signed with the Chiefs or would sign with the Chiefs but he sign with the Texans today.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Texans?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Texans</a> have signed former <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahawks</a> center Justin Britt to a 1-year deal worth $3.2 million, source said, with a chance to make $5 million. Britt announced the signing on IG. <a href="https://t.co/D1QXPRvnwO">pic.twitter.com/D1QXPRvnwO</a></p>— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1367997218540642304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I thought he’d sign for $1-2m personally. |
I think it's a huge advantage for The Chiefs this offseason. Front office in place, coaching staff in place, schemes well established. More importantly, scouting all experienced and already in place.
With a weird combine and whatnot, the established teams are going to have a big advantage. I bet we get some real gems out of this draft. |
Quote:
I hate that I’m setting myself up thinking there’s a chance we actually end up signing Linsley, but I do think there’s a realistic shot at that happening. Britt was probably never an option. How would that look? LT coming back from Achilles Center coming back from major injury and a missed year???????? Niang coming off major injury and a missed year Schwartz coming off major back injury that caused him to miss the majority of the year. LDT...lol Osemele hahaha |
If Justin Britt, who has not played a down since October 2019, is getting $3.2 million then Reiter is probably going to get paid some pretty good money. I’m guessing at least $7 million as a starting point.
|
Quote:
The answer is no. You're grossly overplaying the meaningfulness of it on the whole. I'm not saying it isn't useful but it's not as useful as everything else prior to it. I'm also not saying you're wrong in that some players shoot up or down because of it. The point is, really, that teams aren't going to miss out on too many players by not having a combine. They'll miss some. They'll get some UDFAs that maybe should have been drafted. They might get some steals on injured players. But as a whole, it's not going to make some monumental difference. Teams have already set their boards. At this point, it's relatively minor shuffling and capturing a few outliers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also think that these teams dumping good OL shows how good this OL class truly is
|
Thought this was interesting data
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">the last 5 Super Bowl winning teams spent below average $ in free agency but signed many key players to one-year, team-friendly deals<br><br>with a bloodbath of cuts next week, we'll see plenty of opportunity for savvy GMs to sign stud players to similar deals<a href="https://t.co/nDK5LP0F5i">https://t.co/nDK5LP0F5i</a></p>— Warren Sharp (@SharpFootball) <a href="https://twitter.com/SharpFootball/status/1367553346832371715?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Aggressive AND smart, that sounds just like Brett Veach to me... 90% of us are going to be pleased as punch with his moves
|
Might as well get prepared for it because by the middle of October or so, the starting line is going to be Fisher - Wylie - new center - LDT - Schwartz.
|
LMAO If Niang can't beat out Wylie for a starting job then he's hopeless.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
”Well I think right off the bat he’ll have a chance to kick in there and compete at guard,” Veach said of Niang in a conference call with the Kansas City media. “This will be a challenge when you have a virtual offseason and how much training camp do we have? So that will be a little bit of a challenge, but you do like the fact that this guy is extremely smart, intelligent. Let’s just play it out, we’ll play best-case scenario that we’re able to start training camp on time, I think you’ll see him pop right in there at guard and compete inside at guard.” |
Allegretti will be starting at LG. He was the only offensive lineman worth a shit in the super bowl
|
Quote:
|
I see B.J. Finney was released. Any chance that the Chiefs might look around at him for a center or at least depth?
Can't imagine Finney would cost a lot, and a 1 year deal would probably be good for him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You like to tamp down expectations too much about the possibility of serious moves being made to shore that unit up for the long term... we'll know for sure in the coming weeks, but you often act like your view is a done deal |
I fully admit to being a bit frustrated with the 'MOAR WEAPONS' crowd, when it's clear that it's time to restock the offensive line.
Sammy Watkins caught 37 balls for us in 2020. That's it. 37. And he played in the Super Bowl, and didn't do shit. But we were 14-1 in games where the starters played. This thing where we just throw our hands up and say Reiter and Wylie are the best we can do? **** that. They're below average. Both tackles are over 30 and have back problems with one coming off an achilles. Meanwhile, Tyreek Hill is 27. Kelce is the old man at 31. And we're supposed to be terrified because we need to replace Sammy Watkins' lousy 37 catches? Naw, man. You can bring back Drob or Pringle cheap. Draft a kid. Or sign a FA that might stay healthy. I'm not saying we need to draft all offensive linemen, but it's time to restock and get younger not only for 2021, but 2022 and forward as well. I'm just as concerned with the DE situation, but you can bring back Charlton and draft a kid there too. Yeah, we can and should add a WR or TE or just a general offensive weapon. We might want to make it so that we can actually use our first round pick from last year while we're at it, and get some ****ing blocking. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's not a chance in hell they're replacing 3 or more offensive linemen in one offseason. Veach said they expect Fisher back. They're going to extend him, you can bank on it. They have to move his salary and they're not going to cut him. We were all hoping Schwartz would retire - as evidenced by his Twitter feed, he has no intention of doing that. So he's coming back too. I'm not saying they won't make moves - they certainly will. But I can almost guarantee that the majority of CP isn't going to like them. More than likely, anybody they acquire in the draft won't be in play until 2022. Next year's line is going to look a lot like last year's (2019, not 2020). unless something really dramatic happens. |
Quote:
There's absolutely no reason to panic and over-invest. |
YOU CAN ADD WEAPONS AND MAKE THE OFFENSIVE LINE BETTER AT THE SAME TIME.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Some people act like it's either or. And some people want to roll with Reiter and Wylie and act like we can't do better. I say bullshit. Veach remade a defense in one offseason. I don't for a second think he can't get an offensive weapon and restock an offensive line. |
Good ****ing grief, people.
The Chiefs signed Remmers early last offseason, signed Kilgore just before Training Camp and Osemele during. The Chiefs won 14 games during the regular season. Stop stressing about the offensive line. There will be plenty of talented guys willing to play on the cheap for a ring. |
We can convert some of those signing bonuses into salary down the road right to help create some cap space?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Every ****ing year, this place goes ****ing nuts over offensive lineman. Last year, it was Ruiz, who ****ing sucked ass last season, the year before, it was Center and on and on and on. The Chiefs under Reid do not place the same value on interior offensive lineman as they do other offensive and defensive positions. That's just the reality of the situation yet threads like these are just ****ing non-stop until the season begins. If Brett Veach says that Fisher, Schwartz and Mahomes will be ready by Training Camp, why in the **** is everyone questioning Fisher and Schwartz availability but not Mahomes? It's just a gigantic, never-ending circle jerk. |
Quote:
Anyway you'll have LDT and Niang coming in next year so theres already 2 upgrades to the line. Grab a center in the 2nd or 3rd round with Fisher/Schwartz in some capacity that's a pretty solid offensive line. Hopefully a pass rusher is there at 31 if not BPA |
All though I'll throw this out here to drive you crazy Dane. What if Veach is saying that to play games to make teams think tackle isnt a priority so a team wont try and jump in front of us to take a tackle in the draft
|
People on Chiefsplanet used to say "Wow, wouldn't it be great to have a QB like Tom Brady so that the team wouldn't have to continually spend high draft picks on Offensive Lineman?".
And now that the Chiefs have an MVP, Super Bowl QB it's "Oh!!! FATTIES! Gotta protect the MVP!!!!@!@@@(@@()@(&)@". It. Never. ****ing. Ends. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Furthermore, that was one year ago, not last week. Reid's entire philosophy in regards to offensive lineman is that the "Best 5 guys will play". That doesn't mean that Niang will spend his career at guard. |
Quote:
|
I’m interested to see what veteran receivers are going to be cut. There’s a good chance that at least one of those guys decides to improve his value with us on a short deal.
I think the market for WR is about to get flooded next week. |
Quote:
Which is why chiefsplanet shouldn't be surprised when Wiley is starting next year. Reid loves the guy and he fits the prototype for a guard in this system. Niang gave the Chiefs a ton of flexibility and for some reason lil chiefy is still acting like Veach didn't give himself plenty of room to operate. |
Quote:
Their first rounder is no longer with the team. 4 of them are out of the league and two are still in the league. Their drafts have been awful and they've barely invested in their offensive line, so I don't see that as being anywhere similar to what the Chiefs have done under Reid, especially given that he's taken so many late round picks and turned them into average to above-average players. |
Quote:
Quote:
Another thing to consider as Mahomes cap goes up there will be some decisions to be made in 2022 some key guys contracts expire. IIRC Fisher is one of those guys. You pointed out there might not be a day 1 starter at LT year 1 but years 2 or 3? Gives you some flexibility from that standpoint. At the end of the day theres alot of ways Veach can go it's great to have options. I'm not really worried about it. I just want someone opposite of Clark as hes too up and down for my liking and think he should probably be shown the door with another season performance like last years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You need to reread your posts. |
"When he was drafted the plan was to play him inside to start."
Don't know how you got him playing at G his whole career out of that statement but alright then. |
Quote:
If the line was "ass", the Chiefs wouldn't have won 14 regular season games and made it to the Super Bowl. Quote:
Starting Caliber Left Tackles don't sit on the bench for 2 or 3 years. They're generally drafted in the Top Half of the 1st round or signed in Free Agency. I think the decision will to sign or draft a guy will be determined by whether or not the Chiefs are in a Championship Window at the time of need. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Again. How did you extrapolate Niang playing at G his entire career out of that statement? I even posted the context of what Veach said and you turned it into this.
|
The talk of Niang starting at G was obviously when Fisher and Schwartz were healthy in a way to get your best 5 on the field.
Given the current situation, I don’t think he’s starting off at G coming into camp. |
I wouldn’t be shocked to see Niang win the starting LT job while Fisher is out.
|
While I agree with Dane’s points, I think the SB did something to motivate Veach that he is now willing to spend high draft picks on fatties.
It could all happen. We spend high draft picks on fatties, pick up offensive weapons and pick up OL depth right before training camp. |
Quote:
As far as your comment regarding not sitting a guy for a year we essentially did that with Fisher yes I know he played RT which IMO is a mistake. I think the Chiefs title window expands more than just this year which while I wouldnt agree with the decision to take a LT 1.31 I would understand the reasoning. |
Quote:
I just want good football players, as many of them as possible. Now, when your QB scrambles for 500 ****ing yards in a SB and can't get the ball to any of his weapons, maybe you might want to think about the fact that both tackles that were out are north of 30, with back problems, and an achilles. That your center sucks balls and your RG is also lousy. Now, you've got a draftee coming in; and you get LDT back, and that's cool. and if Fisher and Schwartz are really ready to go that's great. But I don't think it's a bad idea to move up the offensive line from afterthought to medium priority. we're all so worried about replacing Sammy ****ing Watkins and his 37 ****ing receptions. (421 yards). Do you realize that Drob had more catches for more yards? (45 receptions, 466 yards)And Mecole Hardman had more than that even.(41 receptions, 560 yards.) We don't have a weapons problem. We have a line that can't run block well. Once Osemele went out, our running yardage dropped. It shot up in the first Bills game because we committed to the run with Kilgore and Alegretti. We could run center-left all day, and we did. Kilgore can't pass block, so back comes Reiter and we can't run the ball again. We're the ****ing best team in football, with the best QB in football, and we've got bullshit in front of him. For two years I kept hearing about how we needed a better RB. So we take one #31-and yeah, we still can't run the ball effectively. We haven't run the ball well since Morse got injured, really. Not consistently. Reiter sucks. Wylie sucks. These are not guys that should be starting on a Super Bowl quality team. By all means, we should draft an 'X' receiver. We should draft a DE, and we should do so high. Maybe take another of each as developmental players later. But it's time to devote some legitimate draft capital to the offensive line. I have no doubt at all that Veach will do so. |
What I don't get is-
Dane- if we were 14-1 with this line, so we don't have a problem- Well, we were 14-1 with Drob and Hardman outperforming Watkins. So what's the problem? Why is it so desperate that we find MOAR WEAPONS? Whoever is still going to be option #3. Maybe #4 after Clyde has an actual offseason to be integrated. I really don't understand why anyone would willingly go into another season content with Reiter and Wylie as your starters and think that's acceptable. **** that. |
I guess what really frustrates me is this idea that-
We can't improve the line and add a weapon. And really, there's only room for maybe one more day one weapon. I mean legitimately, that's what we're talking about. There's really only room for a legit #2, and the rest of the skill position set is stacked. (yes I know Drob is a FA, and Pringle a FA, these are pieces you can afford if you want to.) And somehow, if you want to improve the line, you're some neanderthal Martyball hold-over that's pining for the days of Okoye and three yards and a cloud of dust. I'm pretty sure Veach, Reid, and Spags and walk and chew gum. |
Quote:
I also don't think we should stand pat and expect that result. |
whatever. I spent the day tearing out and rebuilding my master bathroom with a box of wine.
I'm half in my cups. It's pretty cool to have the best QB in football and argue about whether he needs more weapons or more blocking. It's all good. |
Quote:
I for one am not looking forward to BitchPlanet again. We won a ****ing Super Bowl and the honeymoon lasted a handful of months. Miserable mother****ers. |
Quote:
There were plenty of plays where the line held off pressure and Patrick had nowhere to go with the ball. Reek and Kelce were blanketed and the other shitstains couldn't get open. You saying we don't have a weapons problem is like me saying the offensive line is fine. Neither is true. |
Quote:
He's about to get paid by somebody. And as for "willingly" going into next season and thinking that's "acceptable", once again, you're conflating what I WANT with what I think will happen. I don't think they're going to do nearly enough to placate the people here. |
Quote:
It's actually been great fun away from this board. Here's the thing-I'm a college drop-out flunkie guitar player. (I've acquired other skillsets too, but that's what I identify as, in a tongue in cheek way) I was a mediocre high school TE/DE. (too skinny, not fast enough). I know a little about football. I also know enough to know that I don't know nearly as much as Bret Veach and Andy Reid. So if I see something, I know they saw it too and know better than I do what to do about it. Sometimes with guys like Carl Peterson, I think egos got in the way to where they refused to see what was plain. I trust Veach and Reid. I know Andy's got to be pissed that all of his glorious plays he spends so much time drawing up get thrashed in a second and a half because his line sucks. Yeah, Mahomes bails it out a lot, but I mean...that ain't the way the offense is designed. It's a nice thing to go to in a pinch when you have to, but it's been a problem for a while now, it just got amplified in the Super Bowl. It's all going to be okay, and as long as number 15 is standing, we'll be in the hunt. And I expect whatever problems the team has in 2021, they won't be the same ones we had in 2020. I just think Veach and Reid are too smart for that. |
Quote:
I mean sometimes that's the way it goes. The best offenses in football history have punted on occasion. We legitimately have room for ONE offensive weapon to be added that would be of any real impact, to be a healthy Sammy Watkins role in this offense. I mean there's only one football. That's really it. ONE. We have two of the most potent weapons in the league. We have another so far underutilized weapon in CEH. I think a regular offseason makes a difference there. (oh, and maybe some better blocking.) Yeah, I mean, we could use a legit #2 that could actually play every week. But it's not like we're hurting for weapons. We're literally trotting out trash at 40% of our offensive line to START WITH. Before injuries. and yeah, Reiter SUCKS. I don't care what PFF says. Wylie BLOWS. They're bad. They're back-up level guys and shouldn't be starting on a Super Bowl caliber team. |
Quote:
Because he's shite. :) |
and again, I'm half crocked, but my master bathroom shower was leaking into my kitchen, and I had to demo the walls around it because the drywall was ruined, and I'm re-tiling the whole thing and while it's going to look really great when I'm done...
yeah, I'm a box of wine down, 'cuz I'm classy. :) |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.