Quote:
Originally Posted by QuitUrWhining
(Post 9994010)
So are the admins/mods going to look into IPs or anything? Granted he probably learned how to use proxies by now, but wasn't whats his face?
More KaperNoob excuses less KaperNoobing
A complete embarrassment…
KaperNoob 3 INTs, 1 Fumble, NO TDs, 20.1 QBR, 127 yd passing. Don't think Alex Smith was ever that bad LOL NOT even in the Nolan days HAHAHA!!!
Time for KaperNoob to shave his brows, hair and pubes ROFL!!!
|
Oh, I figured it out, you're talking about Dom Capers? You know its spelled with a C, right? Not entirely sure what that has to do with Kaepernick though.
Or maybe you're talking about something from here:
https://www.google.com/search?q=kape...l=np&source=hp
Quote:
Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS
(Post 9994022)
What deficiencies? If Kap was able to score in the red zone like Alex has been doing for a long time now, 49ers win last week and would still be undefeated in Super Bowls. So you're telling it's all luck that Alex has been 21 - 5 over the last 3 seasons? He's a smart guy and knows what it takes to win a football game, 21 - 5! This is a new offense, new team, and a young season. They are still learning (the whole offense not just Alex) and if they keep trending upwards they can turn out to be something special. I trust that Andy Reid will get these guys performing at a high level pretty soon. They are just scratching the surface.
|
No they wouldn't. The Seahawks just plain beat the 49ers' ass. They got dominated. Smith would have been just as futile, if not moreso in that situation. That is on the coach and QB, and Smith might have had better stats against the Seahawks (namely the INTs), but they still would have gotten dominated.
Deficiencies like his shit 3rd down percentage, him never being able to lead a team to win a game (oh, that's right he did it once against a bad Saints defense 2 years ago...). His best is literally to not lose a game. The more a team can take Alex Smith out of the equation, the better it is for them. I'm talking about the team he's on. The more the opposing team can make Smith the key piece the better their chances of winning.
And more time for teams to figure this offense out (and for Alex Smith to get hurt). The Chiefs have not played a good team yet. They beat the shit out of what is probably the worst team in the league, a team that got laughed at for punting 11 times, when the Chiefs punted 10. Now why the **** would a team be punting 10 times? Would it be because they've got a shitsack middling QB that sucks on 3rd downs? Then they barely edged out a mediocre Cowboys team at home, once again thanks to ST and defense. The Chiefs are about the level of the Cowboys. I'd actually say that other than QB, WR (Austin + Bryant > Bowe + Chiefs other receivers), and TE, the Chiefs have the edge. Romo isn't even elite but he's better than Smith is. And that's even with how he sometimes completely sucks.
Smith had to play his best to hang with a middling Romo on a worse team.
I'm not even taking away from Smith, he played ok in both games, basically the best of what he offers (decent completion %, good red zone, no turnovers). That's ok, its still disappointing and shows he is exactly who everyone knows he is. If the Chiefs have to rely on Smith to duel with an opposing QB, I expect they'll lose.
We'll see how things go if the Eagles get up big like they did against the Redskins. Hopefully that doesn't happen, hopefully the Chiefs defense feasts on them (Philly hasn't played a defense of the Chiefs level yet, and actually I think the Chiefs match up well as they've got playmakers to match the ones the Eagles' have on offense), and Smith is once again a very limited factor in the outcome of the game. Wouldn't mind seeing Charles have a big game either. Hell I'd love to see Smith have a 400 yard 4TD game, but the chances of that happening, well even the Smith fans know better than to bet on that.