ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rams trade for #1 overall pick (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299347)

Tribal Warfare 04-18-2016 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12182734)
I'm fairly certain the method is as follows:

Murray is next man up, and Bray will be competing with whichever low risk/ high upside/ dude that slid down the board-QB they draft next.

If Bray is on the roster next season then Aaron is ****ing up, and Bray is crushing it

RunKC 04-18-2016 09:51 AM

Jets could try to use Mo Wilkerson to trade into top 10 and get Paxton Lynch. Could easily see this happening.

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york-jet...er-quarterback

The Franchise 04-18-2016 09:52 AM

They'll **** up Lynch if they trade up for him. Lynch absolutely needs to sit for a year.

RunKC 04-18-2016 10:02 AM

Idk how that trade would work honestly. The Jets would have to trade ahead of SF if they want Lynch. Browns and Jags seem like the only option due to cap space. I sont think either team would trade down that far unless you sweeten the deal with something like two 2nd Rd picks to go with Wilkerson.

Doesn't seem likely to me but anything could happen.

Chief Roundup 04-18-2016 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12183856)
Jets could try to use Mo Wilkerson to trade into top 10 and get Paxton Lynch. Could easily see this happening.

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york-jet...er-quarterback

Since Wilkerson is under the franchise tag that brings up questions.
Has Wilkerson signed the tag? Can the team lift the tag currently, I know there are windows that the players and teams have to work within.
This dude is looking for a huge payday so it seems to be very constrictive to where he would be able to even be traded even thought they can "massage" the first couple of years at a lower cap number.

DaneMcCloud 04-18-2016 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12184096)
Since Wilkerson is under the franchise tag that brings up questions.
Has Wilkerson signed the tag? Can the team lift the tag currently, I know there are windows that the players and teams have to work within.
This dude is looking for a huge payday so it seems to be very constrictive to where he would be able to even be traded even thought they can "massage" the first couple of years at a lower cap number.

Wilkerson hasn't signed the tender so he can't be traded.

If the Jets rescinded the tag, he'd automatically become a free agent, so that's not happening.

RealSNR 04-18-2016 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12183818)
If Bray is on the roster next season then Aaron is ****ing up, and Bray is crushing it


Or, they'll keep Bray around as 3rd string because his contract goes that long, while Murray is the primary backup

Tribal Warfare 04-18-2016 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12184104)
Or, they'll keep Bray around as 3rd string because his contract goes that long, while Murray is the primary backup

What's the point? He's dead weight, if he can't be justified a legit backup and possible starter.

Hackenberg,Cook, Prescott should be the next man up if KC isn't targeting Lynch,

DaneMcCloud 04-18-2016 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12184113)
What's the point? He's dead weight, if he can't be justified a legit backup and possible starter.

Hackenberg,Cook, Prescott should be the next man up if KC isn't targeting Lynch,

Hackenberg is garbage

Tribal Warfare 04-18-2016 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12184132)
Hackenberg is garbage

****ed up position in Penn State, needs to get his confidence rebuilt in the right situation.

DaneMcCloud 04-18-2016 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12184134)
****ed up position in Penn State, needs to get his confidence rebuilt in the right situation.

He's inaccurate as ****.

If there's one thing that any good QB coach will tell you is that accuracy can't be fixed.

Tribal Warfare 04-18-2016 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12184139)
He's inaccurate as ****.

If there's one thing that any good QB coach will tell you is that accuracy can't be fixed.

He was on target in the Pin Stripe Bowl against WV as a Sophomore. He was thrown around like a rag doll because he had no O-Line help in his Junior year which developed bad habits.

Remember, there were many poster having a big ole circle jerk before the start of last season where he was the #1 overall prospect.

RealSNR 04-18-2016 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12184113)
What's the point? He's dead weight, if he can't be justified a legit backup and possible starter.

Hackenberg,Cook, Prescott should be the next man up if KC isn't targeting Lynch,

Why is he still on the team to begin with? And what's the stop the Chiefs from continuing to keep him around?

Not every ****ing QB has to be a pet project to turn into the next great starter. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and a flawed QB is just a flawed QB.

You're going way overboard on Bray. The Chiefs HAVE kept him around in spite of him showing the team nothing to convince them that he's a reliable backup, so why wouldn't they continue that path, especially if he's cheap and they don't have to spend another draft pick on a QB?

I'm not saying they SHOULDN'T draft another QB. I'm saying that just because Bray is on the roster next year doesn't mean shit about what Murray is or is not with the team.

Tribal Warfare 04-18-2016 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12184143)
Why is he still on the team to begin with? And what's the stop the Chiefs from continuing to keep him around?

Not every ****ing QB has to be a pet project to turn into the next great starter. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and a flawed QB is just a flawed QB.

You're going way overboard on Bray. The Chiefs HAVE kept him around in spite of him showing the team nothing to convince them that he's a reliable backup, so why wouldn't they continue that path, especially if he's cheap and they don't have to spend another draft pick on a QB?

I'm not saying they SHOULDN'T draft another QB. I'm saying that just because Bray is on the roster next year doesn't mean shit about what Murray is or is not with the team.

Why waste time on a QB that will be out league, because he isn't getting it? There isn't any justification for that whatsoever. You always look for the next possible starter because QB's are the ultimate currency if you have one or not.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-18-2016 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12183818)
If Bray is on the roster next season then Aaron is ****ing up, and Bray is crushing it

Okay, it's been a long day and I'm bored.

Lucy?

'splain.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.