Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16214435)

But man, since Reek leaving was all about $$$, KC sure paid $$$ for MVS to be a 3rd or 4th option. :shrug:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16214435)

But man, since Reek leaving was all about $$$, KC sure paid $$$ for MVS to be a 3rd or 4th option. :shrug:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16214440)

Do you not understand the difference between what is essentially a QB contract and this one?

This is nothing, and it’s for 2 years.

Go damn some of you are ****ing reeruned about this shit.

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSBMVP (Post 16214401)

Andy went 11-5 with Bowe - Donnie Avery - A.J. Jenkins- Junior Hemingway in 2013. Chiefs will be just fine

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16214444)

Saints also wanted him. It was bidding war and we did what was needed.

Originally Posted by emaw1979 (Post 16214447)

They also had healthy Jamaal Charles and very good defense. There were 10 pro bowlers on that team and most of them were on defense.

This team has a bad defense and a declining offense. It still has Patrick Mahomes though so we will see. They have time and assets to fix it.

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 16214211)

Then he’s a more expensive version of Hardman rather than Pringle or D-Rob. I actually would consider him a small upgrade over Hardman. I feel like the Chiefs have done nothing but whiff at the WR position outside of Tyreek for almost all of Andy’s tenure. Tyreek was the exception that made it all okay. MVS is a guy I’ve watched a lot and really felt like he sucked. So seeing him get paid a veteran deal and be hyped as part of the answer is not real encouraging 2 days after losing Tyreek.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16214461)

I'll give you the bad defense - for now.

But declining offense?

We lost ONE contributor, have signed two and still have FA and the draft to go.

Oh, and the best QB on the planet.

Take a breath.

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 16214371)

As I recall, Tyreek was a part of that second half offense and the aforementioned 'bed-shitting'. His presence alone didn't change the outcome. Hell, he looked like he was pouting half the time.

I don't think anyone on here is 'ecstatic' about Hill leaving, not sure where you're getting that from?

But people that are acting like the sky is falling need to chill the **** out. Reek and his agent made a 'business decision' and forced our hand. It is what it is. We're worse right now, but this will be a better move for the Chiefs in the long term. Tyreek can only band-aid a few issues on this team. The trading of him (and the money, cap space and draft capital gained) has the potential to fix a LOT more issues on this team.

Now the Chiefs front office just needs to get shit done and Veach and his scouts need to have another great draft. It can be done. But it's up to them.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16214435)

But man, since Reek leaving was all about $$$, KC sure paid $$$ for MVS to be a 3rd or 4th option. :shrug:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16214469)

This is what I don't understand with some people. I could see the constant ****ing whining and complaining if we had somehow lost Mahomes. Hill hurts for sure. It eliminates our biggest all around weapon. But we still have our HC, QB and TE. We added a WR2, improved our WR3 and still have Hardman as a weapon.

And we have 8 PICKS IN THE TOP 135 OF ONE OF THE DEEPEST DRAFTS IN HISTORY.

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16214490)

When exactly did JakeF murder you and inhabit your body, TEX?

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16214469)

This is what I don't understand with some people. I could see the constant ****ing whining and complaining if we had somehow lost Mahomes. Hill hurts for sure. It eliminates our biggest all around weapon. But we still have our HC, QB and TE. We added a WR2, improved our WR3 and still have Hardman as a weapon.

And we have 8 PICKS IN THE TOP 135 OF ONE OF THE DEEPEST DRAFTS IN HISTORY.

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16214483)

Yeah as I said I accept it's a fair argument that the offence WITH Reek collapsed. But then there's the Buffalo game too. Depends what we're focusing on I suppose, but both positions are defensible in my mind.

Have you read the "optimists" thread? Have you read any post by Rasputin? There are some people here who really do seem to be suggesting they're happier he's gone right now. Perhaps in the long-term, and perhaps AFTER the draft and FA we can say that. But right now it's nonsense. I mean i'm excited to see who we pick for sure, but I'm not cartwheeling around thinking about how it'll replace a HOF 4.2 WR.