ROFL

I think we should just trade down everytime until we have 35 7th round picks! 1 of them has to be Tom Brady!

And way to many people have listened to blowhards like Mark Schelerth on ESPN talk about how offensive linemen are more important than QB's I'm sure he'd have no interest in trying to make the position he played look more important.

That's the best idea I've heard yet, Mr. milkman. Awesome concept and addresses a lot of concerns.

There's just one problem, though. I've done some calculations based on the draft value chart (or, as we in the field call it, the DVC) and assuming that we receive comparable value when we trade down both the first and the second time, we would wind up with a total of 112 picks in the 7th round and there aren't that many.

FAX

My favorite hypothesis this off-season has been from some posters suggesting, and seriously I mind you, that KC not turn in its card on time.

It doesn't get more chickenshit than this.

Sancez seems to be the leader we are looking for-the new face of the Chiefs.

We need D help, but I think we take a QB.

Haven't you been paying attention to chiefzilla?

I think the best strategy is to just recruit and sign directly out of Haskell Native College; we can be politically correct, save a ton of money, and keep the risk factor low in the process!

I just had a conference call with Spit Bubble, and he says it's a go.

I bet we stay put and pay the money-we have the cap room.

There is no logic, these are people that act like Drew Bledsoe was never good which is stupid.

Draft chart is tha debil.

What?

It's a bold move and a stroke of genious(cps).

REP!

Yes, Pioli is known for outside-the-box thinking, and we should embrace him pulling a Huard on draft day.

Well, one thing we could do is trade down twice, then trade up three times.

I don't know what that would leave us with position-wise, but I'll bet we wind up with quite a few quarterbacks that way.

FAX

He was good. But not good enough.
Posted via Mobile Device