Weren't there more rushing attempts against the Rams than Cassel pass attempts?

Check the stats from 05 on. Like I said, a minor Leinert hiccup.

Did you know that on average when a team throws more than they run in a game lose the game?

Not sure if the dumb point, thats not really a point, is meant to be a shot at Cassel, but as was said earlier, Cassel was one of the positives from the Rams game.

Now, disprove that Jon Baldwin must not catch a pass or we lose.

Not when Cassel was in. First half was 18 passes and 13 (?) rushes. (Not sure where sacks play into stats).

Pro-rated out, in a full game that is 36 passes and 26 runs. In the past, for the Chiefs that translates into a losss. For the elite QB's... not so much.

Again, this is not always the case. But it is the norm.

Cassel 3:16

How many passes resulted in first downs?

You're a ****ing moron.

In Fitzgerald's second season, well before Warner became the starter, he caught 103 passes, the most in a single season for 1409 yards and established himself as one of the elite receivers in the league.

Just shut up, you dipshit.

You have never gotten a single ****ing thing right.

Ever.

Fitzgerald has really missed Warner too. He just had, by far, one of his best seasons as a receiver last season averaging 17.6 ypc, compared to his previous best 14.9 with Warner in 08. One of his worst productive years came in 09, with Warner, when he averaged a measly 11.3 ypc, compared to his next worst 12.6 in 10.

Baldwin caught some balls in 2011. Throw in those stats to back up your hypothesis, and I will listen.

Don't know. Don't care. 40+ games of stats to back up a fact.


It's kind of goes back to what everyone is/was blasting Clay about earlier in the thread. Checkdowns are not going to get it done.

Why don't you look up some stats on some of the best teams in the league.

See how often they throw.

See how often they run.

Then get back to me.

Hint: they throw more than they run.

This isn't 1995.

Then you didn't your research on the subject an can be ignored.

Not sure what you mean?

I've done the research. I'm guessing at this point several have checked my research. No one has disputed it. Not even Poili.

Why are people arguing 2011 Matt Cassel on the 2012 game 2 thoughts thread?

Who is doing that?

I'm arguing the 40+ starts in his Chiefs career Matt Cassel vs 2012.

Run more we probably win. Throw more, most likely we lose.

The reason the Chiefs lost the game was not because they threw more than than they ran. They lost because they got down early, and turnovers.

If anything Cassel kept them in the game by passing.