ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Peter King: Chiefs will listen to trade offers for Albert (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271265)

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512600)
Then he was on pace for far fewer in 2012. Seems his arrow is still pointing up. I'm going to keep my expectations in check but Smith is better than Cassel.

He took 24 sacks in less than 9 games iirc.
Posted via Mobile Device

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

philfree 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9512701)
He took 24 sacks in less than 9 games iirc.
Posted via Mobile Device

I just counted them and came up with 20. I could have counted wrong I suppose but I don't think I did.

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

It's kind of like Kyle Orton at the end of the 2011 season. He sucked in the redzone, but he was clearly more effective than Cassel. Even though dumb ****s like re-run said they were the same. Neither is a franchise QB and that's the problem. Let's not get carried away though.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

I have to wonder if Alex Smith would take so many sacks if they weren't always in the lead?

Sometimes, when you're up a score...why force a ball rather than take a sack and just punt the ball away...especially when you have an elite defense?

There are just so many factors to statistics...

again, to me...Alex Smith lies somewhere between Trent Dilfer and Trent Green. He also lies somewhere between way ahead and way way ahead of Matt Cassel.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:49 PM

Anyway, not to derail this "Branden Albert thread," but this tweet scares me.

Quote:

@Jacobs71

I think Miami is the best landing spot for Albert. They have the cap to pay him what he wants. He fits their scheme really well.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:50 PM

and that's the same thing with his lack of yards this past season...

why pass the ball all over the field when you're consistently winning? It made no sense.

we compare his passing stats to an Andrew Luck who's team was constantly fighting to win games which meant he was constantly throwing the ball and constantly racking up yards...

there are just so many freaking variables...

Alex Smith is what he is (not Matt Cassel)...but cherry picking stats to make him look like Matt Cassel just makes whoever is doing it look like a god damn moron.

philfree 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512704)
So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

Yeah we need the QBoTF in this years or next years draft. A 1st or 2nd rounder. Alex Smith alone isn't enough unless we win a SB with him. :)

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512655)
Yeah I already corrected it. It makes a small difference. So he was on pace for about 35/36 sacks.

Eight full games is half. I read 24 you read 20.
Ill go with your number just to make it easy.

That would be closer to 40 than 35 by my math
Posted via Mobile Device

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

I'm ok with Albert leaving for a 2nd round pick (hopefully a 2 and a 4).

That trade wouldn't bother me a bit.

I'd still be trading for a trade down on draft day...to me it's Geno (not happening), trade down, or total bust.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512705)
I just counted them and came up with 20. I could have counted wrong I suppose but I don't think I did.

I just looked at the season total.
Posted via Mobile Device

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512704)
So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

I agree with that. Unless, he's one of those rare late bloomers which I seriously doubt. I do think they draft someone, and Stanzi will be gone. I also expect them to move away from Smith after next season if they aren't considerably better.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:53 PM

On fox sports.com
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512714)
.but cherry picking stats to make him look like Matt Cassel just makes whoever is doing it look like a god damn moron.

We're not cherry picking.

We're talking about entire seasons.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512707)
I have to wonder if Alex Smith would take so many sacks if they weren't always in the lead?

Sometimes, when you're up a score...why force a ball rather than take a sack and just punt the ball away...especially when you have an elite defense?

There are just so many factors to statistics...

again, to me...Alex Smith lies somewhere between Trent Dilfer and Trent Green. He also lies somewhere between way ahead and way way ahead of Matt Cassel.

When everything goes well you get 2010 Matt Cassel. To me that is Matt Cassel's ceiling. That's what I thought his ceiling was when we acquired him. Alex Smith's 2011 isn't that different from Matt Cassel's 2010. Smith might be a little more consistent, might have a little higher ceiling. But if you push him like Reid's offense will, I think he could crack. I don't think he will blossom in to a top 8 QB.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.