ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Poop In case anyone hadn't decided on the KC Star yet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=323861)

DJ's left nut 07-23-2019 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14359505)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No arrest or charges, but suspended 6 games. <a href="https://t.co/UggiIwtvOi">https://t.co/UggiIwtvOi</a></p>&mdash; Jeff Rosen (@jeff_rosen88) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeff_rosen88/status/1153353160980926464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

How amazing is it that this guy is so blinded by his agenda that he doesn't realize that this post hurts his position.

If the NFL was willing suspend Reed - a very good pass rusher for a well known squad with a marquee quarterback and recent Lombardi - without a pile of evidence, it's pretty !@#$ing apparent that they'd have suspended Hill if they had anything to work with.

In fact, it suggests pretty strongly that the bar Hill had to clear wasn't just 'not guilty' but rather 'strongly exonerated'.

If the NFL suspended Reed but not Hill, what the hell do you think that says about how that 8 hour hearing went?

But Rosen's too ****ing dense to grasp that very simple conclusion.

O.city 07-23-2019 09:27 AM

This was my thinking. They're usually so quick to pull the trigger, doesn't them not doing it mean they had pretty good evidence not to?

Rain Man 07-23-2019 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14360040)
How amazing is it that this guy is so blinded by his agenda that he doesn't realize that this post hurts his position.

If the NFL was willing suspend Reed - a very good pass rusher for a well known squad with a marquee quarterback and recent Lombardi - without a pile of evidence, it's pretty !@#$ing apparent that they'd have suspended Hill if they had anything to work with.

In fact, it suggests pretty strongly that the bar Hill had to clear wasn't just 'not guilty' but rather 'strongly exonerated'.

If the NFL suspended Reed but not Hill, what the hell do you think that says about how that 8 hour hearing went?

But Rosen's too ****ing dense to grasp that very simple conclusion.


Yeah, he doesn't seem very bright.

Oh, I just looked him up. He works at the Star. No wonder. I don't pay attention to those people any more since they're fake news.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2019 09:33 AM

Rumor has it he is a drunk idiot.

Jerm 07-23-2019 09:37 AM

They just can't let it go....they all thought they had broke a huge story and were going to be hailed as great journalists and were all oh we got him...and boom the entire thing blows up in their stupid ****ing faces.

They can't accept it, Brooke thought this was her new Mixon and Rosen is her lapdog...

****. Them. All.

Mecca 07-23-2019 09:39 AM

Rosens basically trying to take sarcastic pot shots while the rest of the writers act like none of this happened.

Valiant 07-23-2019 09:53 AM

If you want to make sure they suffer you need to create a webpage of their manipulation of the facts and continued assassination articles and responses.

Maybe a billboard or flyer.

But to hurt the star this needs to be done before the regular season. Get the citizens outraged.

Then the hurt will be during the stars chiefs edition when they print 10x the normal amount of papers and stand at intersections selling. Get the city to not buy any. Make it hurt. Besides lost revenue they will also eat coat of unused papers.

As for kctv5, people with ticket will still get it. Maybe make the broadcast free via internet through the site for preseason. Do not use another channel. Then sell to a different station next year.

TravelingChiefs 07-23-2019 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14359505)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No arrest or charges, but suspended 6 games. <a href="https://t.co/UggiIwtvOi">https://t.co/UggiIwtvOi</a></p>&mdash; Jeff Rosen (@jeff_rosen88) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeff_rosen88/status/1153353160980926464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Rosen is from Seattle so he couldn't care less about the Chiefs. the KCStar is just a stepping stone to him and he saw a chance to **** over KC with the Hill nonsense.

Marcellus 07-23-2019 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14360040)
How amazing is it that this guy is so blinded by his agenda that he doesn't realize that this post hurts his position.

If the NFL was willing suspend Reed - a very good pass rusher for a well known squad with a marquee quarterback and recent Lombardi - without a pile of evidence, it's pretty !@#$ing apparent that they'd have suspended Hill if they had anything to work with.

In fact, it suggests pretty strongly that the bar Hill had to clear wasn't just 'not guilty' but rather 'strongly exonerated'.

If the NFL suspended Reed but not Hill, what the hell do you think that says about how that 8 hour hearing went?

But Rosen's too ****ing dense to grasp that very simple conclusion.

I am going to keep saying this because it needs to keep being said....

The NFL's Conduct policy is very clear there must be clear evidence of a violation for there to be punishment.

Obviously there was no evidence Hill had violated the policy therefore they could not punish him. Obviously they found evidence Reed did violate the policy.

The system isn't as willy nilly as people believe and Goodell uses 3rd party investigators to give him the info he needs to make decisions.

FAX 07-23-2019 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14360084)
Rosen is from Seattle so he couldn't care less about the Chiefs. the KCStar is just a stepping stone to him and he saw a chance to **** over KC with the Hill nonsense.

Not the best reason in the world to lynch a man.

FAX

FAX 07-23-2019 10:11 AM

After looking into her track record, it appears that Lisa Friel is the kind of woman who would not hesitate to cut an abuser's nuts off with a dull butter knife.

If she recommended "no suspension", you can be pretty sure that there was no evidence.

FAX

Marcellus 07-23-2019 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14360099)
After looking into her track record, it appears that Lisa Friel is the kind of woman who would not hesitate to cut an abuser's nuts off with a dull butter knife.

If she recommended "no suspension", you can be pretty sure that there was no evidence.

FAX

Exactly FAX, exactly.

Buehler445 07-23-2019 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14360040)
How amazing is it that this guy is so blinded by his agenda that he doesn't realize that this post hurts his position.

If the NFL was willing suspend Reed - a very good pass rusher for a well known squad with a marquee quarterback and recent Lombardi - without a pile of evidence, it's pretty !@#$ing apparent that they'd have suspended Hill if they had anything to work with.

In fact, it suggests pretty strongly that the bar Hill had to clear wasn't just 'not guilty' but rather 'strongly exonerated'.

If the NFL suspended Reed but not Hill, what the hell do you think that says about how that 8 hour hearing went?

But Rosen's too ****ing dense to grasp that very simple conclusion.

Conspiracy tho yo!

Hammock Parties 07-23-2019 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14360099)
After looking into her track record, it appears that Lisa Friel is the kind of woman who would not hesitate to cut an abuser's nuts off with a dull butter knife.

If she recommended "no suspension", you can be pretty sure that there was no evidence.

FAX

https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4...RQ2JO5JLrc-nr4

Hammock Parties 07-23-2019 10:38 AM

https://i.imgur.com/ks2kzWH.png


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.