HERMAGHERD, REALLY!?!?

What's wrong with that? That's pretty much all I do?

You can't afford me, sailor.

Good point. We don't want some QB doing what Manning and Kaep did this week. To beat top level teams the Pack and Ravens obviously throwing for a buck seventy-five is the key.

uh huh..like one who wants to piss off her dad...this is just a repeat of Sanchez..

AND YOU WERE WRONG

what? win?

Chiefs did that..without "big" numbers....and it took all 53 players.

oh, but if Manning or Kaep threw for a buck seventy five and still won...it wouldn't matter.

would it?

200 yards passing is equal to "big" numbers now?
Posted via Mobile Device

didn't say that...it doesn't always take "big" numbers to win.

God damned show-boaters! In MY day...(crusty old coach speak trailing off)...

Yes, I was wrong about Sanchez. Was he a better option than Cassel for 2009?

Magic History 8-Ball says; "YES".

They beat Jax, not a SB type team LMAO

nope. total conjecture.


our coaching was shit.

You are right.

You can depend on 20 yard touchdown drives multiple times in every game...
Posted via Mobile Device

Geno has to play the Patriots this week. :(

Would those players be......



per chance........



wait for it..........






















"The Rrrrrrrrrright 53":????LMAO

If my aunt had nuts and all that shit. They did what it took to beat a good team obviously that wasn't to throw for 175 yards.

I'm pretty sure they could have 10 attempts and beat the Jags. I'm talking big boy football.

..they beat 53 of the top 1500 pro football players in the country.

Sanchez had to play them too in his first season. How did that turn out?

ya, didn't think you would answer, instead, just give other teams credit for "doing what it takes".

ROFL

keep moving the goal posts.

If you don't think great QB's don't throw for big yards you are the dumbest poster on CP and it's not worth explaining this to you. It's like someone trying to say 2 +2 = 3. At some point you just give up.

no, you're talking butthurt over another teams QB.

oooooh burn...maybe I could spend all season complaining about something that is totally irrelvant to the Chiefs.

Geno Smith isn't a QB, he's a meme

Actually this isn't even true.


It was 46 vs 46. And that's if every active player played
Posted via Mobile Device

reduced to semantics?

He will be fine. The Patriots aren't good on defense. They aren't good on offense right now.......

The jets could beat them.

Nothing moved.

Alex Smith won yesterday with only 170 something yards because of the short fields he had to work with.

Not saying he wouldn't have won anyway but we sure didn't have an 80 yard td drive. Hell not even saying we couldn't have gone for 80 in the first half had we had the opportunity, but the facts are that we didn't do it.
Posted via Mobile Device

NOPE. The New England Bradys will throw for eleventy billion yards.

If you equate semantics to facts
Posted via Mobile Device

damn defense and special teams butt ****ed us!!!

You are right here too, obviously big time passing yards are irrelevant to the chiefs.
Posted via Mobile Device

didn't have to...every game can be won or lost on a plethora of mitigating factors.

QBS ever throw for three hundred yards and LOSE?

Most teams don't air it out a lot when they are up by 3 touchdowns

:deevee:

Yeah, dummy. That's exactly what I said.

I even said we might have driven fit eighty yards and a td given the opportunity. We didn't though.

I'm not going to assume we would have, 7 punts in a row and all...
Posted via Mobile Device

doesn't change the point., nor does ignoring it.

Did I seriously just see Geno compared to Kap and Manning?

LMAO you guys kill me.

Hence the sentence in the post you quoted saying "if we had the opportunity"
Posted via Mobile Device

Lmao. I didn't ignore anything.

I know its a team game.
Posted via Mobile Device

..then how much a QB throws for is irrelevant...it's just a stat, and doesn't determine victory.

ROFL holy shit

Not crying at all. Hell I started this by calling a guy out who makes excuses for Alex then comes out and says Geno didn't throw for many yards, and also says Geno threw more ints than tds.

You know one is greater than one and all.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'd love to see W/L records for QBs that average 150 ypg or lower.

average? it's ONE game.

if a team can't stop the run...PASS.

It depends in how the game went.

if the qb threw for two hundred yards in the fourth quarter down thirty points, those yards didn't determine anything.

if he throws for 256 and rushes for 40+ more and wins the game at the buzzer those yards were needed. And most definitely determined the outcome of the game
Posted via Mobile Device

every play determines the outcome of a game.

again, do QBS throw for 3 hundy and lose?

... and here, I thought wins were all that mattered. :doh!:


The Chiefs get an easy road victory in week 1, and people are whining about some Jets QB and how many pass yards are thrown? There's something bad wrong with people today.

That's why I asked about when the last time Alex averaged over 200 yards a game for a season.

Hell Stevie we didn't rush for a ton of yards either. We created turnovers and scored on them. Something we haven't done with consistency in years. But to count in that week in and week out is idiocy
Posted via Mobile Device

every game is different...

Well obviously it happens. Quite often. I mean what dies that have to do with anything.

what's more likely, a qb throwing for three hundred or more and scoring 28 points


Or a qb throwing for 150 and the team scoring 28 points?
Posted via Mobile Device

another obvious post.


But we have 8 years of Alex Smith games and 176 yards is right around his career average.
Posted via Mobile Device

When?

Who is whining?


And **** dude I'm happy as hell we won convincingly yesterday. But I can see that type of win isn't going to happen every week.
Posted via Mobile Device

well you said their names. THAT'S A DIRECT COMPARISON
Posted via Mobile Device

wut

Well that's at least good to see. Like dude said, every game is different. KC jumped up multiple TDs on an inept offensive opponent... so they coasted the rest of the way.

Have to figure that won't happen vs Dallas.. so let's see what happens. All these QBs are throwing gobs of yardage often because they are in dogfights.. I'd rather us not have to be in dogfights.. but if KC is? I won't assume shit on how well our offense copes.

I think he was trying to say the jags couldn't stop the run and that's why we didn't pass much.
Posted via Mobile Device

I agree.

You are missing the point. Let me homer it up for you. Trent Green could throw for 175 and beat you like Alice did this week. Trent Green could also dial is up and throw for 350 yards and beat you in a shoot out on a consistant basis.

Alice has shown he can do one. He has NEVER shown the ability to do two. If you want to go from beating the shit to avg teams to beating the Ravens and Pack you'll will have to eventually be able to win in a shoot out.

That's all anyone is saying.

If he dials it up to 300-350 a handful of times this year and wins. Then I'm all in on Alex.

Us? JFC dude...

Hell I think we have a good shot at beating Dallas. But I really feel like what we did in the passing game yesterday isn't going to cut it. And by listening to Reid at least he understands it
Posted via Mobile Device

My fault. I'll never again give an example when passing yards can be a good thing.

This is a great post. Sums up my thoughts as well.
Posted via Mobile Device

depends on the defenses and ST... EXACTLY why we LOST in 2003.what were TG's stats for that game?

comparing offenses is nothing but stats.

that depends on the defenses, WR's and wait for it ..YAC.

And dammit Stevie you have been in enough threads where I was defending Cassel to know I'm not just trying to hate here.

I want better, if Smith shows he's that I'm all in. If not I'm going to call it like it is.

Yesterday was very average, in comparison to the rest of the league passing wise. Smith had quite a few opportunities in the second half to make plays more often than not he either didn't gage the play or the play that was made wasn't good enough. 7 straight punts iirc. From Reid's hand picked perfect qb. Against a terrible team
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes! And YAC is often dependent on what???

Also you do at least acknowledge there will games there year where Alex is going to need to throw for big yards for whatever reason right?

And I will stand right there and stick up for Alex if that was the case and Smith had played as well as to be expected. (look up my history with Cassel again, I didn't expect much...)

its scary to think what green would have put up points wise yesterday against that d, with our current line. Alex had a ton of time most of the day. And with the same attempts. Alex threw the ball quite a bit while we were obviously in vanilla burn the clock mode
Posted via Mobile Device

I'll give Alex some props for his ball placement on most passes
Posted via Mobile Device

Of course it does, but it depends a ton more on those things when your QB only passes for 16 or 18 TD's total all year.

So why fight the fact that a ballin ass QB is the way to go?

Alex Smith is ass

I do to on the short stuff. That was a big reason Avery was able to score yesterday.

I've moved up from that stance a bit. Cassell was Ass. I think Alice is a serviceable stop gap. No need to stop firing on the position though even with Bray on the roster.

No, he isn't. He's a better than average qb.

Meaningless when you are up by 26 points.

Ok man but, you are going to be tuned out. In reality, Clark has done all he's going to do for you for a while. You can forget better. The sooner you realize that and quit knit picking, the happier you'll be. Just try and enjoy the win and put the past behind you. This organization is moving forward.

The only stat that counts is the W/L record, and they don't base that on passing yards, they they base it on points scored.

Well, guess we better close the board down! No point in further discussion, unless it's to talk about how great the team is!

I've already acknowledged this
Posted via Mobile Device

Again, dumbass, I enjoyed the win very much. I want to continue enjoying wins. I realize that I have a better chance to enjoy wins if I'm not counting on multiple very short field tds
Posted via Mobile Device

I think he will progress this season to be on that Matt Schaub level. Not great, but not a liability. that would be a great step forward for Alex Smith.