![]() |
Quote:
|
Based on that tape alone I don't see why you'd sit him for Thuney.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If Hump's biggest issue is conditioning as the game goes on, but he's decent when in the first half...
Is it a terrible strategy to have him start the first half, and slide Thuney in for the second half if/when (before) he starts to drop off? I know a mid-game shuffle is normally not ideal and typically done out of desperation after poor performance or injury. But if that's the gameplan all along, and everyone is ready/on the same page, could that be a net-positive? Essentially a LT by committee approach. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe he does ultimately offer the higher ceiling, but he really hasn't shown that, and probably never could once he lost that time. I just don't think they can bank on his past form to reappear. I'd be amazed if they don't go with Thuney. Plus side, maybe he is a more affordable option next year now, with a full offseason and a chance for us to give him a fair chance to learn the offense and build some chemistry with the OL, maybe we'll see that higher ceiling yet. |
Everybody is talking about how this affects Mahomes and the passing game, but I wonder how much it changes our ability to run the football. Thuney is a beast at LG. Putting him at LT and somebody else at guard has to hurt the Chiefs running game, right??
|
So, in watching that tape DJ looked halfway decent, and all these comments about them having to change the offense for Thuney make you think they want to go with Humphries. I really wonder if they have a plan as of now, or if they are still figuring things out. They didn't exactly put anyone in a position to succeed yesterday, so you have to think they aren't overly concerned or excited over what they saw and weren't going to put much stock in the film that came out of it because of the situation.
Maybe they've already seen enough in practice and the film room to know he's the guy. Obviously, if you really want to put the best group out there, it's going to include him, at least on paper. I hope he's up for this, because this isn't the Arizona Cardinals anymore. I know he's used to big games in college, but this is an entirely different beast. |
Quote:
|
He's got 12 days, then a regular week, then an extra week before the Super Bowl.
It's not crazy. I do think his only issue is conditioning. |
That tape isn’t too bad.
You know they’re gonna have 3-4 really tough practice days with pads between now and game day. Let him work and I think you may come out ahead. If Mahomes and the offense don’t continue to operate as they have the past two games, it won’t matter who is in that spot. They found a groove that kept those defenses on their heels more and they have to continue to attack in that manner. |
We will be fine either there way.
It sure would be nice to see this offense at full, full strength in the playoffs. |
I think I might watch the All 22 tonight if I get bored enough.
|
Quote:
I just struggle to see how you can start a guy with that little time over a winning team and an OL that has worked UNLESS he really shows out. The wheels didn't start coming off with Thuney, surely he gets the nod to start there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe that's a naive take and they've been trying their hardest all along, but there's no question that we've had plenty of times when we've looked like shit in the regular season these last few years only to turn it on when we get to January. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the TEAM would love Humphries to be at LT. But if he's looking shaky in practice over the next few weeks, then yeah, they won't risk it. The game tape doesn't look nearly as bad as some would have you believe. I don't think the gameplan was for Wince to hold the ball for 5 seconds every play. But he was sure gonna try! He's ****ing terrible. Anyway, Andy'll do what he thinks is best, and I won't squeal about it either way. But my feeling is that if Humphries is anywhere near 100%, they'll be rolling with him. AND still aiming to get the ball out quick. Because that is smart, regardless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not used to PFF yet and just figured where it said position is where the player played. https://64.media.tumblr.com/658f0316...8571e55eb7.pnj |
Quote:
F'n clown dick |
This thread has been a great read today, its been trench warfare lol
I'll save all my told you so's for two weeks from now... and then I'm gonna say TOLD YA SO |
I just want what's best for the team in the playoffs. I thought DJ had some success in the first half, but got worked in the second half.. Patrick will get the ball out quick so maybe he can hold up. I just don t trust him like I do Thuney...
If Andy does.. well I guess I will too.. We probably won't know who will start till a couple of days before the gm when it leaks out.. You know Andy will play it coy and not tell us anything.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Are there breakdowns of Caliendo statistically that I have missed? If the Chiefs end up going with Humphries in his not yet optimal conditional, certainly it's because they think
Humphries/Thuney >Thuney/Caliendo. They aren't just going to look at Humphries vs Thuney. |
Quote:
https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/mike...testNewsWidget |
Quote:
|
I think Humphries starts at LT in the playoffs -- and we will make a switch if he plays poorly. With competent LT play and Thuney at RG and the weapons we now have on offense, I am guessing we don't plan on having to rely on defense winning games this post season.
|
From a fan perspective, the Denver game didn’t change anyone’s opinion. Those who went into the game saying stick with Thuney because he hasn’t given up a sack, the offense has been its best the last few weeks, don’t mess with what’s working… want to start Thuney. Those who were leaning towards Humphries are saying he was good in the first half, the scheme hurt him, he has two weeks to get into shape…
This is very reminiscent of the “did KC sign Taylor to play LT or RT” argument 2 years ago. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Humphries was beat every way imaginable in the 2nd half on Sunday. He'll be sitting out the playoffs! |
It will be interesting what Andy does.
I had been in the start Thuney at LT camp before the Denver game, but now I am on the fence. I thought Hump played most snaps very well and also had some horrible snaps. Yet, it looked like he may have shown he can hold the left edge if he can eliminate the whiffs. I would hope Andy can scheme to address that. There are just too many variables that none of us aware to know who will get nod… |
Quote:
|
I’m just glad Donovan Smith isn’t an option and people have finally STFU about that overrated turd
|
My guess is it will Be Thuney at LT in the playoffs. They are going to want to go with what worked during their most successful period in the season. Thuney at LT and Caliendo at LG.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I’ve decided that I think they’re for sure gonna try to put Humphries back out there in the divisional.
I mean if they were willing to put Donovan Smith back on the field after not playing for over a month (and not looking very good during the games he did play prior), then I don’t see why they wouldn’t at least take a stab at the higher ceiling outcome which involves Hump. If he does suck out loud during the first half, you go back to Thuney. Easy peasy. But I don’t think he will. Especially not during these home playoff games where traditionally our OL plays their best. He will be able to time the snap count better and communicate with Joe and the offense clearly. |
Humphries got to knock the rust off and I think he'll start with Thuney back at LG. This gives the Chiefs the best possible line IMO especially if they protect DJ like they did Thuney.
|
I don't remember where I read it, but it spoke to how Thuney plays LT.
He doesn't really get back. He works with what he has which is technique and hands - it ain't length. So he can't be as deliberate as you'd like him to be. So it was suggested that the reason Mahomes was getting the ball out so quickly and the drops were so short was that Thuney simply doesn't like getting back to a 'catch point' and receiving the rusher -- he prefers attack the rusher and that makes the drop point for Mahomes shorter because if he goes back 7 or 5 steps, it makes it too easy for rushers to just go around Thuney. Humphries doesn't do that. Look at some of those reps vs. Bonitto -- he doesn't look like a guard playing OT -- he LOOKS like an OT. He gets back, he gets set, he forms a pocket. As opposed to Thuney who attacks and holds on for dear life. Yeah, I think I'm trending towards Pugs as well here - I think they'll try Humphries because he just has a skill set and way of playing the position that Thuney doesn't. Is it smart? Maybe not - why **** with the quick passing game when it was working? But to a previous point (Maybe 'maqes?) -- if it ISN'T working in a game and Thuney is your LT, you really can't flip to a 5-7 step game and a downfield attack. Thuney can't really give you that. And you can't flip from Thuney to Humphries in-game, IMO. Whereas if you start with Humphries and he's not holding up to the downfield stuff, you CAN dial in the quick game again and probably won't even have to take DJ off the field. And if you do, it's easier to take him down and move Thuney out to LT than vice versa. I think the flexibility offered by starting Humphries is great enough that it's a risk worth taking. |
Regardless, I'm betting we won't have any idea what they're going to do until game day. I have to imagine they'll see it as a strategic advantage to not tip their hand about the plan until the last minute. Should be interesting.
|
Good points DJ. When we lost rice, we weren't throwing those quick hits as often but with Hollywood back, we have done more of that. I would hope that no matter what they do with the line, they keep using those quick hitters.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So maybe you ought try getting a little more analytical. The clips are out there if you want to look at them. He most assuredly was not 'getting manhandled'. But if people buy you books and you just eat the pages, there's not a hell of a lot I can do to dissuade you from it. Carry on... |
Quote:
I suspect they had good reasons for signing this guy over D Smith. Health is my only concern for DJ. Like DJ mentioned above Humphries plays like a tackle. Thuney plays like a guard, admirably, but still limited. |
Quote:
It’s the exact opposite of Kingsley, who has 99th percentile size, strength and agility. You saw Kingsley get dog walked so much bc he can’t use his hands well. Alex Highsmith tried everything against Thuney and none of it worked. He tried to bull rush him and Thuney stood him up. He tried to use his hands and it didn’t work. He even tried to fly around the corner and Thuney was ready for it. That’s what I like about Thuney. He isn’t easy to beat. You’re not gonna beat him quickly very often. The only time I saw it was against Myles Garrett which was completely understandable. That extra second that Thuney provided is vital. That’s why I’d consider a conversation for him being the LT next year. He’s wen way better than Humphries so far from what I’ve seen |
So now we've gone from using Thuney as the emergency LT in the playoffs to starting him as the permanent LT next season?
This place might as well be flooded with Bengals fans. That's delusional. |
Yeah, Thuney was good in spot duty, but you've gotta play a certain way with him at LT. They don't wanna do that.
It'll be Humphreys for better or worse. |
Quote:
While it probably won’t happen next year, Thuney at LT could save us a lot of bank |
Gatorarm LT pay is still LT pay
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can't believe this is even a conversation. It's like people don't actually watch the games. |
Quote:
Also, Thuney>>>Morris/Kingsley and probably a rusty DJ |
|
Quote:
We all better hope DJ can get it done because teams will know how to beat Thuney. |
Quote:
It took us about 15 games for the line to finally look adequate, and it was when Thuney was moved to tackle. |
I'm in the Humphries to start camp. no one in the league has seen this team with DJ, Thuney, Creed, Smith, Taylor, Hopkins, Brown, Worthy, Pacheco, Hunt.
They're preparing in the abstract |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the playoffs, teams will have an answer for that. You need more than adequate in the playoffs. |
Quote:
Thuney has been far better than people give him credit for. And yes the get rid of the ball quickly. We’ve been doing that all year to protect every LT that has played. But our options are extremely limited. It’s Thuney, Humphries, overpaying Cam Robinson (who was awful in Detroit) or a Mahomes like trade up for a lottery ticket. So what’s it gonna be fellas? Say what you will but I’m very confident that Thuney is not gonna get baptized and ruin games like Wanya or Kingsley have. |
The only concerning game Thuney had was against Cleveland and Myles Garrett.
The Chiefs aren't starting Humphries. LMAO |
Quote:
Teams are gonna look at the Denver tape and see him gassed by the 4th quarter and put their speed rusher on him like Denver did with Bonitto. From what I saw DJ wasn’t bad in the 4th quarter. He was just exhausted. |
Here we go with the scared bullshit again. Nothing - NOTHING - is scary for this team.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You put a guy at LT with arms as short as Thuney and it will limit your drop backs for an entire season and teams WILL figure out how to exploit him. They may be able to figure it out in the post-season. Thuney isn't a long-term solution at LT at all. Credit for doing yeoman's work in a pinch, but you can't put him out there as a genuine plan. |
Quote:
Again, that works as a changeup but I don't think you can build an entire offensive scheme around it. I mean I guess Brady did it, but he also had peak Gronk and Hernandez at the time. We won't. We've spent 2 years preparing for an offense built around our WRs. We'd be essentially scrapping that. |
Quote:
|
One thing is for sure: I would rather start Thuney all year in 2025 than pay $15+ million for Cam ****ing Robinson, and I was in that guys corner.
I’m done with that guy. He’s gonna want his money and I pray to God Veach doesn’t do give it to him bc that guy isn’t gonna help |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What happened with Cam Robinson? Hasn't he been really good for the Vikings? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.