keg in kc |
05-13-2019 06:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing
(Post 14266703)
Meanwhile, people like DJ and I think Ep5 may be the best episode of the season and sums up 10 years of Danny's character in totality.
|
That's where we disagree. To me it's exactly what they did with Jamie. They took ten years of character development and just trashed it, like it never happened. Although I think the did it to a greater degree with Danaerys, the Mother of Dragons, Breaker of Chains, freer of slaves and downtrodden across a continent. She killed the same people in King's Landing she saved across the Narrow Sea, and why? Because Jon Snow spurned her? That was the reason they gave us. Fear it is.
And that, that I don't believe, that the Dany as presented on the show would kill women and children, methodically, coldly.
Just like I don't believe that the Jamie presented on the show would do anything that he did after the battle of Winterfell.
I do want to emphasize that: my reaction has nothing to do with the books. It's what i see as inconsistencies within the show itself.
Quote:
Maybe it's just her inevitable fate that bothers some.
|
Nah. The destination was fine. She didn't ever need to win. Isn't at least part of the point that everyone loses. It's how they got there. It felt dishonest to me.
I've said this before: it was like they had marks they had to hit, in terms of who needed to be where doing what. But they couldn't figure out how to get them there, so they just stopped trying to make sure that things made sense or stayed in character.
Quote:
My wife's only complaint about last night is that Cersi didn't die brutally enough.
|
Pretty sure everyone agrees on that one. They were probably trying to go for some deep meaning there when all they needed was a knife in the back.
I still think the whole point was to milk sympathy for Cersei. Which I hate.
|