Yep.

That's what you call a horse ****ing. What a call.

Yeah, it seems that you are the only one in this thread posting about it who actually understands the rule.

There was no fumble since his arm was still underneath the ball

This.

I will never understand this dumbass rule. If a RB runs gets tackled as he enters the endzone and the ground causes him to fumble it is just a fumble, recovery, TD. This is no different. Two feet down then the ground caused him to lose it but he regained control.

The rule was applied correctly.

However, that doesn't mean the rule isn't ****ing reeruned.

Worst announcers evar

That's why you don't draft QBs.

I swear if this game total stays under the vegas total by 4 points or less you have got to wonder how much of this crap is fixed.I hate the raiders but c'mon that was a td.

Richard Seymour! haha. And he was getting held.

The officials made the correct call.

the non TD was a blown call, the ball touched the ground but the receiver still had control

Because a catch requires control of the ball. A RB already has control once he gets the hand off. The rule changed last year.

I don't disagree with this.