It's not a smart pick.

Period.

Lets go ahead and say he is Dante Hall (and that is a high bar to set) he's still a long shot to last 4 years at that size getting consistently pounded by guys 3x his size.

Dominating at the college level and surviving at the pro level are completely different things...

Soren Petro was talking about Gillberry playing OLB. Can he play the position? He was great last year he needs to play more IMO.

Also why take Arenas when you just took McCluster isn't he a return guy too?

Mecca, I am not picking on you bro, but you are complaing about Arenas being mocked to the 4th round. However, I think you were screaming for Griffen with pick 2A. He is still available in round 4. It works both ways.

I did agree with this too. McCluster HAS to be a good WR for this to be a good pick. Even if he is a GREAT third down back, this pick is fail cause we have Charles.

Everson Griffen must have shit on someones head, that's pretty ridiculous that he's still there.

I'm more annoyed that we didn't get a nose tackle when there were several very good NT prospects.

I think the problem with the "could" factor is the fact that we are mad that the "could" would have been better players at more important positions.

Even if McCluster works out, or Arenas, or Moeaki, do they give you the same ROI that Clausen, Cody, Griffen, Graham, Williams, or any number of prospects would?

No.

So not only do you have the risk of uncertain players, you have a lesser potential positive return.

That's just ****ing foolish,and that's why they are poor picks.

Instead of continuing to troll the shit out of this, although it has been fun, I'll just say why I'm not flipping the **** out.

When the day 2 picks were first made, of course I was pissed. I would of rather had Golden Tate, etc.

Once I got the **** over it (This part is important), I actually just looked over and tried to make sense of the actual picks. McCluster is a dynamic kid, performed well in a tough conference and brings actual speed to a team that has very little after Jamaal Charles. The Chiefs increased the speed on a offense that was slower than a blue hair in the passing lane.

Arenas is another electric player that will help make sure Charles will be fresh as the lead ball carrier on offense. Leggett sucks ass and Carr gave Jabar Gaffney a career day in Denver. I did not want him anywhere near this team before the draft started, but I have to admit it...it makes sense too. He has the same listed height as Brandon Flowers. Flowers is just fine, but Arenas is too ****ing short to be a starting CB? Are you serious?

Asamoah was just a fantastic pick by Scott and was great value.

Moeaki, I won't defend that shit.

If it were my choice, my draft would look completely different than Scotts after Eric Berry. Oh well.

So far, I feel much better at this point than I did one year ago. Dare I say it? Maybe there is some hope?

I don't think the pick sucks. Nickel back is an extremely underrated position. But there are others I would have taken there.

There are other guys I would have wanted for McCluster, but the pick seems to make sense if they're expecting to use him like Sproles. And Moeaki, in a Charlie Weis offense, makes all the sense in the world, if he can stay healthy.

So if we did, Flowers, Carr and now Arenas would be effective until age 35?

Why do you continually move the goalposts when called on your opinion?

I did agree with this too. McCluster HAS to be a good WR for this to be a good pick. Even if he is a GREAT third down back, this pick is fail cause we have Charles.

How is that moving anything, you listed the example as a guy who's been a cover 2 CB his entire career.

I get that you want to like the picks but seriously Arenas is going to have to be like the best returner in the league or be a far better CB than anyone thinks he is to make this pick look ok.

Better than the worst draft in team history= good.

Awesome

I'm not setting the bar at Dante Hall. I'm setting it at Sproles.

And if he's Sproles, I'm more than comfortable with this pick. And I think he very well could be. Unlike Hall, McCluster is built like a brick house. He may be tiny, but he's not skinny by any stretch. And if he can take 25-30 carries in the SEC, he can handle 8-10 on the pro level, especially given that a lot of his touches will probably occur on the second level of the passing game.