Originally Posted by memyselfI (Post 8197156)

I HONESTLY believe that Cassel will NOT SUCK with ONE offensive coach and a coach that he can work with. He may not be the next Tom Brady, as some believed he was supposedly promised to be, but he will be a serviceable QB who can win some games. Somehow Cassel gets blamed for sucking when his stupid coach could not keep an OC on staff. I think that dysfunction and turnover absolutely played a part in Cassel's lack of progress.

I also think they should draft someone so I don't agree with Pioli's all eggs in Cassel's basket if that is what he intends to do.

Originally Posted by memyselfI (Post 8197239)

I just think he deserves a year with some stability and sanity to see if he can become something good. I think Pioli screwed up with Failey in the first place and was NEVER on board with that hire. I think if keeping Cassel means that we don't get a good experienced HC then that is a problem. But I think most FAIR people can see the lack of consistency he was forced to deal with over the last three years with all of the changes in personnel he was dealing with. I think he'll do better with less drama and dysfunction.

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 8197432)

bobfescoe Bob Fescoe
@
@CharlesRobinson no by players. I know Haley is feeding you this info.


Fescoe just won't give up....

Originally Posted by memyselfI (Post 8197239)

I just think he deserves a year with some stability and sanity to see if he can become something good. I think Pioli screwed up with Failey in the first place and was NEVER on board with that hire. I think if keeping Cassel means that we don't get a good experienced HC then that is a problem. But I think most FAIR people can see the lack of consistency he was forced to deal with over the last three years with all of the changes in personnel he was dealing with. I think he'll do better with less drama and dysfunction.

Originally Posted by chiefscafan (Post 8197441)

Memyself you want a serviceable QB? One that can win a couple of games?


Sorry I want to win a lot of games I want to win superbowls I don't want a serviceable QB

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8197460)

Please quit posting you ****ing crack whore.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 8196386)

No, Matt Cassel is hardly the least of the Chiefs problems. Justin Houston's lapses in coverage may be the least of the Chiefs problems.

Matt Cassel is a massive problem. Probably the 2nd most of the Chiefs problems.

The fact that he's not as responsible for this trainwreck is the coat-tail rider in the big chair hardly means he's 'the least of our problems'.

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8197841)

No he is the least of the Chiefs problems. You can bitch about Cassel, Pioli, Haley sucking all day long but as long as the Hunt's own this team they will never win anything again.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8197855)

Ownership doesn't matter if we can get a good quarterback. No one will care less about Clark Hunt if we have a franchise QB.

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8197872)

So they will do something that they haven't done in 50 years? I will believe it when I see it

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8197875)

They tried in 1983 and 1979.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8197855)

Ownership doesn't matter if we can get a good quarterback. No one will care less about Clark Hunt if we have a franchise QB.