THIS is what I feel is childish.

Do you know, for a fact, that ALL people that voted to move DC are conservatives?

And even if they are, are you 100% certain that their motive is to make it "go away" because they're no longer winning?

This whole "I'm taking my ball and going home because the libs are winning" argument was MADE UP by the libs because they want to rub it in and now there's nobody there...

I agree that "oops" and "uh-oh" are in your face but those expressions intentionally defy the "certainty" with which the conservative veiwpoint previously expressed itself only to be proven incorrect.

I'm sorry but the truth hurts.

I have no ulterior motive nor do I think you are questioning my integrity.

You feel that I'm arguing with you because I've traditionally come out on the side of conservatives and you're a liberal.

In reality, I'm arguing with you because you appear to be the only one here whining about the DC forum.

See my previous post.

So even though you say you approach it with humility, in reality, it's all about an eye for an eye, right?

Don't be a hypocrite, dude.

ROFL You might be surprised to learn that I haven't even voted. Early on I didn't give a flying fuck which sub-forum was moved. And in all honestly, it still is not THAT important to me. I see potential good and bad from the DC forum being moved, but no matter how it turns out I know that she will still be amongst us, so I am damned no matter what.

I just like arguing for the sake of arguing. :)


Parker has explained more than once what he views as childish in this subject. You fail to grasp it because your opions have changed and as such you view the left's opinions of the right hiding as correct because they do not see, or fail to admit to seeing what you do. The childish behaviour in this thread ranges from silly and conspiratorial accusations, to my little joke earlier, to anyone on the right engaging these stupid notions (mostly me), to the fact that there may be a few on the right who actually want the forum gone for the conspiratorial reasons given by the left.

What high horse?

I'm only defending the tactics of those who fought fire with fire.

and you know this how? because the libs pissed you off the most?



sorry ... but when can we tell when you making your decision based on information germain to the situation or when it's being made because somebody pissed you off?


check the circumstantial evidence ... it supports the theory of the "I'm taking my ball and going home" theorists.

parker ... can i get a "childish ruling" here?

I think I have already ruled that for myself, a couple of times.

hehe :p

I'm sorry, but the circumstantial evidence you point to is a number. There's no explanation of that number, who contributed to that number, or why they voted for that option in the 1st place.

In reality, it's not evidence. It's nothing.

You and your cohorts have arrived at said theory ALL BY YOURSELVES. I admonish you to point out ONE POST that even suggests conservatives want to "hide" DC because they're losing.

Um, I thought you were against such things.

I guess I was right, wasn't I? This is about REVENGE.

Of course there is no way to know for sure, but I base my interpoloation on the comments from the conservatives in the first 300 posts. It may not be 100% but I actually would be willing to put 100 bucks on it being 90%+

What comments?

I think people are reading into it what they want to read...

Really? Like the J. Morton worm?