ChiefsPlanet
Page 35 of 52 « First 2531323334 35 3637383945 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sanchez? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216506)

Skip Towne 10-18-2009 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186005)
What's with you and the polls?

Furthermore, Hamas has more that 550,000 rep points.

I think he's liked well enough around here.
What that actually proves is that the draftubaters constantly rep each other. Not that he is popular. BTW, how do you know how many rep points he has?

Reaper16 10-18-2009 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 6186579)
Their negativity toward anything the Chiefs do might have something to do with it. ;)
There is no such thing. They have been the first ones to defend Dorsey & Albert, they laud the ability of the underplayed-but-talented players on the roster such as Morgan. This idea that the critical posters on the board aren't actually Chiefs fans or are more concerned with their own egos than with the team itself is not founded in reality. You're blind to positivity coming from them.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 10-18-2009 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186591)
Yeah, those games he won for the Chiefs in 1997 were an aberration.

:rolleyes:
In 1997...he was a backup...given opportunity he showed he could be given a chance to start full time. That's why he is lumped in with those other career backup types including Matt Cassel

Marcellus 10-18-2009 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186593)
Go read the ****ing books, Dummy.

I'm sure you're going to tell me that Pioli was the man that wanted Brady, right?
You are still avoiding the point you cant dispute. Where in the book does it explain Bledsoe's contract if Brady was supposed to start by week 3?

jidar 10-18-2009 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6186459)
I truly think its asinine that posters like Mecca, Hamas, et al aren't seen as Chiefs fans by a sizable percentage of this board. Some of you honestly believe that the primary motivation behind their posts is "being right," and being able to tell people "I told you so." You see them as not being fans of the Chiefs, and thus you see them as an enemy. Nevermind that their fanatical devotion to the team is quite evident, nevermind that to muster up the anger that they can is evidence of considerable passion for the team.
They think they're realists, I think they're just cynics.
It's unusual for Mecca to give praise to a Chiefs player, or at least that's my perception, and I'm afraid that I find that style of fandom to be tiring.

Marcellus 10-18-2009 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6186602)
In 1997...he was a backup...given opportunity he showed he could be given a chance to start full time. That's why he is lumped in with those other career backup types including Matt Cassel
Once again don't use facts with Dane.

Gannon was stuck behind Grbac for a reason at that point. He was shitty journeyman QB at that point in his career.

DaneMcCloud 10-18-2009 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6186575)
You cant use facts with Dane. Somehow a book written after the fact negates the 10 year$101 million contract.
You are a real ****ing moron.

The "10 year, $101 million dollar contract" was no where near those numbers. Hell, Bledsoe played 5 years beyond that contract for his career! And for two different teams.

I guarantee you that he didn't see one quarter of that contract. AND, the Patriots cap was not damaged by trading Bledsoe.

Smoke and mirrors.

DaneMcCloud 10-18-2009 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6186611)
Once again don't use facts with Dane.

Gannon was stuck behind Grbac for a reason at that point. He was shitty journeyman QB at that point in his career.
Really? Is that what you think?

I'd bet that 99% of all Chiefs fans feel differently.

And I'm pretty sure we all think there would be a different outcome in 1997.

DaneMcCloud 10-18-2009 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie (Post 6186602)
In 1997...he was a backup...given opportunity he showed he could be given a chance to start full time. That's why he is lumped in with those other career backup types including Matt Cassel
He was a backup for the same reason why San Diego cut Drew Brees and drafted Philip Rivers:

Marty Schottenheimer was a horrible evaluator of quarterback talent.

Marcellus 10-18-2009 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186615)
You are a real ****ing moron.

The "10 year, $101 million dollar contract" was no where near those numbers. Hell, Bledsoe played 5 years beyond that contract for his career! And for two different teams.

I guarantee you that he didn't see one quarter of that contract. AND, the Patriots cap was not damaged by trading Bledsoe.

Smoke and mirrors.
If you think they gave him a then record contract with plans to replace him 2 years later you are ****ing dumber than I thought.

The reality is you have been caught once again as the king with no clothes.

Full of shit with nothing to back it up.

DaneMcCloud 10-18-2009 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 6186598)
What that actually proves is that the draftubaters constantly rep each other. Not that he is popular. BTW, how do you know how many rep points he has?
I think it's funny that you guys think that we all "rep each other".

That's nonsense.

How do I know? Because he's higher on the rep chain than me and I've got 550,000 points.

Reaper16 10-18-2009 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jidar (Post 6186607)
They think they're realists, I think they're just cynics.
It's unusual for Mecca to give praise to a Chiefs player, or at least that's my perception, and I'm afraid that I find that style of fandom to be tiring.
I'm surprised that every Chiefs fan isn't cynical. They've been one of the worst franchises in the entire NFL. Poorly run in nearly every facet for decades.

ChiefsCountry 10-18-2009 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186624)
And I'm pretty sure we all think there would be a different outcome in 1997.
I don't, Elway would have still beat us.

stevieray 10-18-2009 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jidar (Post 6186607)
They think they're realists, I think they're just cynics.
It's unusual for Mecca to give praise to a Chiefs player, or at least that's my perception, and I'm afraid that I find that style of fandom to be tiring.
it's nothing more than playing both sides. because there is no risk involved.

Marcellus 10-18-2009 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6186624)
Really? Is that what you think?

I'd bet that 99% of all Chiefs fans feel differently.

And I'm pretty sure we all think there would be a different outcome in 1997.
You are moving the goal post.

Gannon was a career back up with no success prior. That was the point you tried to refute.

Nobody is trying to argue his success the last half of the 97 season. Except you..


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.
Page 35 of 52 « First 2531323334 35 3637383945 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.