Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 13427909)

I'm glad we are friends Strongside.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 13427967)

You sound nice...

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 13427909)

I'm glad we are friends Strongside.

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 13427964)

BUH GAWD KANG. VINCENT KENNEDY MCCLOUD AND STONE WOLF SHRINK AUSTIN ARE ON THE SAME....DAMN....PAGE

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 13428193)

For what its worth, 610 brought back up audio this morning of Terez Paylor saying in December he thinks Peters doesnt want to be here, and turd sandwich Fesco said he has talked to multiple people off the record who said Peters doesnt want to be here.

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 13426847)

He'll most likely be caught with six AK-47's in his car, and two kilos of coke and a teenage illegal immigrant girl beaten and tied up in his trunk. Most likely.

And everyone will be like, "But he gets sooo many turnovers!". Right?

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 13427660)

I think IF Veach got the right deal for Peters he would trade him in a heartbeat just solely on Peters extreme emotional immaturity that always shows up at the worst times in the heat of battle. It sure isn't because of his play when he has a cool head(other than his lack of tackling:#)I think there is some truth to these rumors.

And you as an owner, GM and coach are thinking about giving this "man/child" a manure load of $$ and then trust that this $$ won't go to his head(on or off the field) when he as already shown he can't be trusted now with a below modest contract ??

Don't mean to go all spiritual here but Clark,Andy and Brett are very nervous about paying Peters IMHO as they should be, indirectly applying this wisdom from scripture that most of us apply in our everyday life(as parents, grandparents and employers) from Luke 16:10-12. Granted this verse talks about the actual monetary wealth but even more so speaks to the "handling" (character or lack thereof) when wealth is acquired.

10“Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. 11 So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? 12And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you property of your own?


IF Veach gets the right deal for Peters, I say take it !! I don't trust Peters at all with a manure load of $$ that now only enables his immature ego to stay stunted and we will never see the same Peters from his first 3yrs again IMHO. Not a hater of Peters at all just a realist.:hmmm:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 13428222)

You can tell that he doesn't. If they believe that he won't commit then trading him now is smart move. Peters is not a KC type at all. Send his but out of conference somewhere and get a 1 pick for him. He's a jerkoff anyway and its only a matter of time before he gets suspended by the league for something.

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 13428222)

You can tell that he doesn't. If they believe that he won't commit then trading him now is smart move. Peters is not a KC type at all. Send his but out of conference somewhere and get a 1 pick for him. He's a jerkoff anyway and its only a matter of time before he gets suspended by the league for something.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13428210)

Wait, so Terez said back in December that Peters doesn’t want to be here and we’re just hearing about it now? That’s very strange.

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13428273)

You’re a ****ing moron.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13428286)

Even if he doesn’t wanna sign a long term deal you can keep him for 3 more years without really sacrificing much.

He’s such a good player and what he brings is so valuable I’d wanna keep that play as long as I could