Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16527575)

The ordinance requires an intentional overt act and an inflicted bodilly injury.

You would have a hard time getting to proof beyond a reasonable doubt of either.

The fact that Adams was pissed off about the game mitigates intent. The clumsy mother****er caused the encounter and Adams was entitled to use his hands to protect himself. He pushed him too hard, but how much time did Adams have to decide how hard he would push the stupid clumsy mother****er that was not supposed to be causing collisions.

And there ain't no ****ing way that nebulous ass injuries like headache, whiplash and possible concussion are provable beyond a reasonable doubt when everyone knows the financial incentive the clumsy mother****er has to lie about these medically undetectable injuries.

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16527525)

Are you talking about the Adams has earned $85 million in NFL salary already and has a contract that could pay him $120 million more?

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/las-vega...cash-earnings/

You might find some chiefs planet boneheads that will think he is clumsy, but will have not much luck convincing anybody else.

Might be a good idea for you to bring less prejudice when evaluating something.

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 16527623)

For anyone defending Devante. I ask the the question what if the person holding the camera was female?

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16527644)

Holy shit. What if he was a man, BUT HE/IT IDENTIFIED AS A FEMALE?

Or vice versa?

Oh. My. God. What if it was a black/Hispanic/Asian tranny? That identified as a spoodle?

Originally Posted by Indian Chief (Post 16527643)

You can't be this stupid, can you?

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 16527647)

You are being a complete dumbass. If it was a woman he would be roasted over the coals. I’m trying to prove you you that the excuse of it just being an emotional reaction is complete bullshit.

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 16527623)

For anyone defending Devante. I ask the the question what if the person holding the camera was female?

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16527675)

If she was female she would have watched where the **** she was going or dropped the gear when losing balance instead of death gripping it.

Death gripping it may have protected the clumsy mother****er from a sprained or fractured wrist, but it was interesting to see how much effort the clumsy mother****er put into not dropping the gear. Too bad his dumbass made no effort to pay any attention to where he was going.

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 16527728)

I found a picture of the camera guy…

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...re-iddv2181002

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16527575)

The ordinance requires an intentional overt act and an inflicted bodilly injury.

You would have a hard time getting to proof beyond a reasonable doubt of either.

The fact that Adams was pissed off about the game mitigates intent. The clumsy mother****er caused the encounter and Adams was entitled to use his hands to protect himself. He pushed him too hard, but how much time did Adams have to decide how hard he would push the stupid clumsy mother****er that was not supposed to be causing collisions.

And there ain't no ****ing way that nebulous ass injuries like headache, whiplash and possible concussion are provable beyond a reasonable doubt when everyone knows the financial incentive the clumsy mother****er has to lie about these medically undetectable injuries.

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16527525)

Are you talking about the Adams has earned $85 million in NFL salary already and has a contract that could pay him $120 million more?

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/las-vega...cash-earnings/

You might find some chiefs planet boneheads that will think he is clumsy, but will have not much luck convincing anybody else.

Might be a good idea for you to bring less prejudice when evaluating something.

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16527529)

Probably. It would depend on a few things, I think.

But I've had whiplash twice, both from car accidents. My father was my physician for the first one because i was still in HS. The thing about whiplash is that for a young healthy adult it usually requires an acceleration/deceleration moment that's hard to replicate by being pushed to the ground by another human being. Even a NFL WR. If it were that easy to induce, you'd see NFL players suffering from whiplash during every game.

Now, it's possible the kid had some prior injury/condition that made him more susceptible, but then why doesn't he ever grab for his neck? Whiplash hurts. A lot. You're going to reach for your neck when it suddenly feels like someone shoved a red-hot nail into your neck. That's just basic reflexive reaction.

I would've bought the sprained ankle thing, or even maybe he broke his tailbone, since he fell on concrete. But whiplash? Concussion? having experienced both multiple times, I just don't see anything in the videos that support those claims, not even close.

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16527804)

I agree. Camera guy is a pussy.

Doesn't matter though. Adams was very much in the wrong there. He should be suspended and he should be fined.

I'm sure he'll be found guilty of the ordinance violation.

Beyond that though, I sincerely doubt the camera guy had any legitimate injury and more than likely faked the shit out of it hoping he could score a few bucks, which he undoubtedly will.

In the end, is what it is. He didn't push himself down.