ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ****OFFICIAL Jets Vs. Bengals Game Thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221450)

keg in kc 01-09-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6428308)
You are so ****ing transparent.

If stating a fact makes me transparent, than so be it.

The Jets won that game because of their defense and their running game.

That doesn't mean Sanchez sucks. Just that he got to ride the wave this week.

Try expanding your mind beyond black and white concepts.

milkman 01-09-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6428318)
He's an NFL quarterback he better make some good throws, but lets not kid ourselves and say the Defense didnt win this game.

You're right, the defense and runnig game won this game.

But Sanchez didn't **** it up.

That is more than you should expect from a rookie QB.

cdcox 01-09-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6428318)
He's an NFL quarterback he better make some good throws, but lets not kid ourselves and say the Defense didnt win this game.

Both teams had exactly 171 yards rushing. Rushing game and rushing defenses were exactly the same. That means the difference in the game was the difference in the passing games.

kcxiv 01-09-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6428320)
didnt the d give up like 150 yards to Benson? How many yards did Sanchez end up with?

And how did the passing game do? They got up and the running game wasnt as effective. I dont hate Sanchez, i hope he does well. I love see'ing a fellow Mexican playing in the NFL. It doesnt happen often, but the Defense won this game. They gave up 14 points. what was the total yards? it had to be less then 300. Thats pretty good.

DBOSHO 01-09-2010 06:52 PM

12/15 of pa passes and slants is pretty impressive

kcxiv 01-09-2010 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 6428326)
Both teams had exactly 171 yards rushing. Rushing game and rushing defenses were exactly the same. That means the difference in the game was the difference in the passing games.

So, the defense won the game? or the secondary. they completely shut out the Bungals.

I am not hating on Sanchez at all. They are moving on and the other team is going home. Martyball won. Hell our Chiefs of the 90's did the same thing, bend bend bend, dont break.

Stinger 01-09-2010 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6428335)
So, the defense won the game? or the secondary. they completely shut out the Bungals.

I am not hating on Sanchez at all. They are moving on and the other team is going home. Martyball won. Hell our Chiefs of the 90's did the same thing, bend bend bend, dont break.

The secondary had something to do but Palmer was awful. He was throwing skyballs that had no chance of being caught.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-09-2010 06:58 PM

Must. Discredit. Sanchez.

[gasp]

Must. Continue. Illusion.


PPPPIIIIIIIOOOOOLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIII!!

[falls on sword]

Hammock Parties 01-09-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6428321)

The Jets won that game because of their defense and their running game.

And the Chiefs could have won their game against the Bengals because of their defense and running game.

keg in kc 01-09-2010 07:07 PM

Sanchez had a really good game, although the reality is that he wasn't asked to do much. 15 passes for 189 yards is not exactly eye-popping, even completing 80% of them. For most quarterbacks, that's a good half. Acknowledging that isn't discrediting him. It's just a fact. Just like saying that he helped to execute their gameplan to perfection and managed the Jets offense as well as he ever has.

Besides, don't get so butthurt. It's not like anybody's talking about you.

keg in kc 01-09-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6428348)
And the Chiefs could have won their game against the Bengals because of their defense and running game.

Yes, because that's somehow relevant to the discussion about the Jets and Sanchez.

Deberg_1990 01-09-2010 07:15 PM

Sanchez is having a very Roethlisberger like 1st year.

Didnt win as many games as he did, but Big Ben was similiar that first year. Just manage the game and dont screw up.

Hammock Parties 01-09-2010 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6428362)
Yes, because that's somehow relevant to the discussion about the Jets and Sanchez.

It's completely relevant.

DeezNutz 01-09-2010 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6428361)
Sanchez had a really good game, although the reality is that he wasn't asked to do much. 15 passes for 189 yards is not exactly eye-popping, even completing 80% of them. For most quarterbacks, that's a good half. Acknowledging that isn't discrediting him. It's just a fact. Just like saying that he helped to execute their gameplan to perfection and managed the Jets offense as well as he ever has.

Besides, don't get so butthurt. It's not like anybody's talking about you.

Drops.

Reerun_KC 01-09-2010 07:33 PM

Looks like a bunch of washing machines on spin cycle...

Everyone is spinning Sanchez stats to discredit...

Quite amusing...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.