Does Kendrick Lewis have the potential to be a Ronnie Lott someday, Exoter? Just curious since you have all this insight.

He least he caught the ****ing thing. And that always seems the default argument for McCluster, if it isn't the fact that he doesn't put up DeSean Jackson numbers, its his turnovers, like he's the only guy who puts the ball on the ground.

And if I'm not mistaken, those "nine" are incorrect. Please show me how and where he was responsible for nine last year.


There isn't?

talk to Jon Baldwin and Steve Breaston then.

You certainly aren't making your case heard as I've been schooling you for the past hour or so.

That would depend on how you think that potential draws out.

Are we talking Lott in the Year 4+ years? Or are we just talking about him progressively getting better?

Because if you ask me if he can be Ronnie Lott, I say no. We don't play in that Era anymore and the game has changed significantly, you won't ever see another Ronnie Lott in this league playing as well as he did.

This game refines itself constantly.

If the Little Engine That Could ever committed 9 turnovers, it would have been instantly sold off for scrapmetal. Regardless of its "heart."

McCluster is an abortion survivor who's lucky he found Pioli the Ass.

Actually, you're right. It was "only" 7.

But the ball kept going off his hands and into defensive backs for interceptions.

That happened five times.

And he fumbled twice.

I agree, and I'm seeing now that you are very knowledgeable.

Where could Kendrick Lewis be in 10 years? Could he be one of the all-time greats?

I don't fully understand football so I'm coming to you for this. Please help me.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here, I never saw 7. I saw 4.

You're giving too much credit to balls that "look" good, but are actually inaccurate and poorly thrown/decided upon.

Any high school player can run a four yard dig when no one is within 15 yards, catch the ball 70% of the time, then get his ****ing head taken off.

Can you explain his lack of playmaking? 28 yards per game is piss poor.

I am sure those 28 yards per game were the most impressive 28 yards per game in league history though.

Like a regular average joe would have only gained 7 yards per game. Dex is 4x the average joe.

He knows more about everything, every subject, than anyone else
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh you troll me so.

Where could he be? Not in the NFL.

he's an 8 or 9 year guy max. At best, with his skillset, he's going to be an underrated cover guy who only gets talked about in free agency. He'll never get the credit he deserves for what he does, as there are always going to be "stars" in front of him like Flowers and Berry. But he'll do his job and get successively better at it, but he'll always have a knock on his tackling and "speed", despite the fact that neither of those matter at his position.

He'll probably plateau right around 29/30 and have a solid year of coverage/interceptions, and if he's lucky, be on a contract year and get paid a nice contract prior to his decline.

If McCluster didn't have an arrowhead on the side of his helmet you'd think he's what he is: a worthless piece of shit.

I agree. He could get the big bucks some day if he keeps up being awesome.

Nah just kidding. I bet he never starts another game in the NFL because he's so ****ing horrible.

Dexter McCluster gave up more fumble and INT return TDs as a result of his incompetence, two, than he scored, one, last year.

Tackling should matter at every defensive position.

Isn't that their job?
Posted via Mobile Device