I agree but Versus SB winners in in the last 7 years?

I didn't say that, but nice attempt at trying to ignore the point. I can just turn that around on you, after all:

The Chiefs should take a statistically probable disapppointment just because some message board posters really want the team to take a quarterback.

How's that any better?


The real issue isn't what you'd prefer, or wouldn't prefer. The real issue is what Pioli thinks is the best choice. Neither taking a quarterback nor NOT taking the quarterback is an inherently bad idea. Insulting people categorically just because they believe that either of those ideas is the right decision this year is just stupid.

I am really wondering what I said to warrant this post. Please explain.

I still want to know what Brees could have done to make the Saints win more games this season.

More yards? Less INTs? Completion percentage? What?

I have already said if we knew, why not draft them. I am no expert but I believe our management is better than all of us.

What the heck is the fun if we are right. :)

Let's cut the bullshit.

Do the Chiefs have a franchise QB (shut the **** up people coddling Thigpen's balls)?

What's the best way to get one?

Good post.

This has been my problem all along. To act like either opinion is categorically wrong is crazy.

Won the SB with the same defense. LOL

Its all offense in here. Been there done that. ROFL

Please explain how you came to the conclusion that Stafford and/or Sanchez are "statistically probable disappointments."

Luck?

Because of Vince Young and Mike Vick. Because they're quarterbacks.

I used logic.

1 year in starting for college.

Bad decisions?

:evil:

Luck. ****.

I want a QB but need to stir the pot. I want a QB and agree but some act they are like scouts? No failures like DV.

Keep contributing.........