ChiefsPlanet
Page 39 of 39 « First 2935363738 39
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football CUTLER TO BEARS! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205240)

The Franchise 10-29-2010 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5634763)
Here's hoping they stay put and take Josh Freeman.

LMAO
I'm glad they ****ing didn't.

Hammock Parties 10-30-2010 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5634822)
Pretty decent?

They barely missed the playoffs with Kyle ****ing Orton taking snaps.

Orton threw for 3000 yards.

They could make NO changes and win the division.
ROFL

Drafturbator fail!

Hammock Parties 10-30-2010 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7127685)
Well, the diabetes thing hasn't become an issue, but I certainly nailed the surly punk thing and the fact that this trade has been a disaster for Chicago.
The Bears are 4-3 and Cutler has 0 support in the running game.

He had a shitty game but I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Hammock Parties 10-30-2010 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 5634991)
Those people are reeruns.

But you're acting like Cassel is worthless and won't ever have a better season than Cutler.

Cutler has a much higher chance of crashing and burning than Cassel. His attitude is a huge red flag.

It's going to be VERY interesting to see what Cutler does now that he doesn't have Mike Shanahan around. There's no question it helped him.
Oh hey...smart guy here.

-King- 10-30-2010 01:53 AM
Jesus the amount of drafturbator fails these past few days is hilarious. Wow.
Posted via Mobile Device

Al Bundy 10-30-2010 08:31 AM
I am more glad today that the Bucs didn't trade for him and even more glad the Bucs moved up in front of Denver to take Freeman.

Frazod 10-30-2010 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7128690)
The Bears are 4-3 and Cutler has 0 support in the running game.

He had a shitty game but I wouldn't give up on him just yet.
He has zero support from the run game because Martz refuses to run.

OnTheWarpath15 10-30-2010 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 7128712)
Jesus the amount of drafturbator fails these past few days is hilarious. Wow.
Posted via Mobile Device
Yeah, it tends to stand out because we don't go around bumping threads in which the rest of you look reeruned.

:D

Do I really need to bump the threads in which 90% of this board wanted no part of Cassel, then flip-flopped within hours of acquiring him?

Or the draft threads, where Dexter McCluster wasn't mentioned for 4 months, then we take him, this place explodes, then flip-flops and says it's a good pick?

I'd rather be known as someone who makes his opinion known and misses on occasion than someone that flip-flops.

OnTheWarpath15 10-30-2010 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7129031)
He has zero support from the run game because Martz refuses to run.
It's not as simple as that, Tim.

They CAN'T run. That OL is horrible.

I know the rest of the board hates him, but I'd like to see one season out of Cutler where he's not expected to be the entire offense. It's been the case in both Denver and now Chicago.

Frazod 10-30-2010 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7129043)
It's not as simple as that, Tim.

They CAN'T run. That OL is horrible.

I know the rest of the board hates him, but I'd like to see one season out of Cutler where he's not expected to be the entire offense. It's been the case in both Denver and now Chicago.
Sure their O line sucks. But Forte has been effective in limited use. Martz is still the same pass-happy lunatic he's always been.

OnTheWarpath15 10-30-2010 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7129077)
Sure their O line sucks. But Forte has been effective in limited use. Martz is still the same pass-happy lunatic he's always been.
Forte's been effective in the screen game, but running the ball?

I don't think he's broken 50 yards in any game but Carolina.

IIRC, Detroit held him to somewhere around 50 on almost 20 carries.

The Franchise 10-30-2010 10:55 AM
Forte is such an awesome RB.....that the Bears just took away his goal line opportunities.

Frazod 10-30-2010 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7129086)
Forte's been effective in the screen game, but running the ball?

I don't think he's broken 50 yards in any game but Carolina.

IIRC, Detroit held him to somewhere around 50 on almost 20 carries.
I didn't say he was Jim Brown. But unlike Cutler, he's not turning the ball over four times a game.

OnTheWarpath15 10-30-2010 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7129098)
I didn't say he was Jim Brown. But unlike Cutler, he's not turning the ball over four times a game.
Very true.

But again, I'd like to see if that was the case if Cutler wasn't required to be the entire offense.

JMO.

Bowser 10-30-2010 11:10 AM
I've got Forte in one of my leagues. I never know to start or sit his ass, as he could rush for 35, but catch for 150 and two scores.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 PM.
Page 39 of 39 « First 2935363738 39
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.