![]() |
Quote:
I have ZERO patience for continuing to place hope in former late round draft pick slapdicks who never turn out to be the franchise QB the GM/HC hoped they would be. No ****ing more. |
Quote:
For example: Seattle picked up Hasselbeck from GB (went to a SB) Raiders picked up Gannon from KC (went to a SB) Chargers picked up Humphries from WAS (went to a SB) The list goes on and on... Would that be acceptable? Would a 9-7 record next year make you happy? |
Quote:
If we attempt to draft and develop smith or Wilson, there will be a lot more leeway. |
Quote:
|
A slapdick backup gives you a 3 or 4 year window, if he's the right one.
A draft pick turns out to be the right one, you are set up for 10 plus years. Pretty easy decision IMO. |
So if you pick up a QB with the No. 1 pick in a draft that is not strong at the QB position you would be willing to accept the 2 or 3 seasons of growing pains before displaying any signs of unrest, however, if you pick up a high profile backup from another team there will be no room for growing pains?
|
Quote:
|
I would rather just run with a rookie now and live with the growing pains than limp along with another teams backup.
|
Remember the last time we traded for a backup QB, who had more game time experience...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Year 3, nope. Qb's acquired by trade or free agency don't win SB's anymore. 6 first or second year QB's were in the playoffs this year, IIRC. |
Quote:
|
I can't believe there are at least 154 idjitz on this site who would want to waste the #1 pick on a rookie QB who is nowhere near the caliber of A. Luck or RG3. It would be worse than the time when the Bonkos killed off their first-round, #25 pick, by selecting Tim Tebow.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.