ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The QB Reid chooses to lead the Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268521)

RealSNR 01-06-2013 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9288269)
I will only be happy if whatever decision is made at QB wins us playoff games and ultimately a Superbowl.

I don't care if that is a draft pick, free agent or trade.

If it's not a draft pick, Reid has very little time to try to make me happy. It better be BAM! out of the gate winning games like crazy.

I have ZERO patience for continuing to place hope in former late round draft pick slapdicks who never turn out to be the franchise QB the GM/HC hoped they would be.

No ****ing more.

Gadzooks 01-06-2013 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9289018)
If it's not a draft pick, Reid has very little time to try to make me happy. It better be BAM! out of the gate winning games like crazy.

I have ZERO patience for continuing to place hope in former late round draft pick slapdicks who never turn out to be the franchise QB the GM/HC hoped they would be.

No ****ing more.

What if he picked up a back up from another team?
For example:
Seattle picked up Hasselbeck from GB (went to a SB)
Raiders picked up Gannon from KC (went to a SB)
Chargers picked up Humphries from WAS (went to a SB)
The list goes on and on...
Would that be acceptable?
Would a 9-7 record next year make you happy?

Molitoth 01-06-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 9289823)
What if he picked up a back up from another team?
For example:
Seattle picked up Hasselbeck from GB (went to a SB)
Raiders picked up Gannon from KC (went to a SB)
Chargers picked up Humphries from WAS (went to a SB)
The list goes on and on...
Would that be acceptable?

If we go with another slapdick castoff from another team like we always do, they better win right off the bat.

If we attempt to draft and develop smith or Wilson, there will be a lot more leeway.

milkman 01-06-2013 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 9289823)
What if he picked up a back up from another team?
For example:
Seattle picked up Hasselbeck from GB (went to a SB)=Loss
Raiders picked up Gannon from KC (went to a SB)=Loss
Chargers picked up Humphries from WAS (went to a SB)=Loss
The list goes on and on...
Would that be acceptable?
Would a 9-7 record next year make you happy?

Not good enough.

O.city 01-06-2013 06:49 PM

A slapdick backup gives you a 3 or 4 year window, if he's the right one.


A draft pick turns out to be the right one, you are set up for 10 plus years. Pretty easy decision IMO.

Gadzooks 01-06-2013 06:50 PM

So if you pick up a QB with the No. 1 pick in a draft that is not strong at the QB position you would be willing to accept the 2 or 3 seasons of growing pains before displaying any signs of unrest, however, if you pick up a high profile backup from another team there will be no room for growing pains?

O.city 01-06-2013 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 9289865)
So if you pick up a QB with the No. 1 pick in a draft that is not strong at the QB position you would be willing to accept the 2 or 3 seasons of growing pains before displaying any signs of unrest, however, if you pick up a high profile backup from another team there will be no room for growing pains?

Thats why you're taking the backup right? He's already experienced and ready to go?

007 01-06-2013 06:52 PM

I would rather just run with a rookie now and live with the growing pains than limp along with another teams backup.

jd1020 01-06-2013 06:52 PM

Remember the last time we traded for a backup QB, who had more game time experience...

Gadzooks 01-06-2013 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9289867)
Thats why you're taking the backup right? He's already experienced and ready to go?

9-7 would be a good record for a team with a new QB being trained by the Walrus. I would expect less from a rookie but apparently that's not good enough..

O.city 01-06-2013 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 9289880)
9-7 would be a good record for a team with a new QB being trained by the Walrus. I would expect less from a rookie.

Less in year 1, maybe.

Year 3, nope.


Qb's acquired by trade or free agency don't win SB's anymore. 6 first or second year QB's were in the playoffs this year, IIRC.

NJChiefsFan 01-06-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9289885)
Less in year 1, maybe.

Year 3, nope.


Qb's acquired by trade or free agency don't win SB's anymore. 6 first or second year QB's were in the playoffs this year, IIRC.

Yes, you remember correctly.

Nickel D 01-06-2013 07:14 PM

I can't believe there are at least 154 idjitz on this site who would want to waste the #1 pick on a rookie QB who is nowhere near the caliber of A. Luck or RG3. It would be worse than the time when the Bonkos killed off their first-round, #25 pick, by selecting Tim Tebow.

jd1020 01-06-2013 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickel D (Post 9289964)
I can't believe there are at least 154 idjitz on this site who would want to waste the #1 pick on a rookie QB who is nowhere near the caliber of A. Luck or RG3. It would be worse than the time when the Bonkos killed off their first-round, #25 pick, by selecting Tim Tebow.

Must be a TON of idiots in the NFL world then. Fairly certain that there have been a lot of QBs drafted #1 that weren't the prospect Luck was.

Molitoth 01-06-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickel D (Post 9289964)
I can't believe there are at least 154 idjitz on this site who would want to waste the #1 pick on a rookie QB who is nowhere near the caliber of A. Luck or RG3. It would be worse than the time when the Bonkos killed off their first-round, #25 pick, by selecting Tim Tebow.

Yeah, we should just keep trotting other teams scrubs until the next Andrew luck comes available in 10 years.:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.