ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft If JA is traded...Gholston is our pick at 5 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=183330)

bkkcoh 04-22-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 4699601)
Oh I guess USC is a nobody? Once again :stupid: I dont know whats worse reading your crap or DaKcMans garbage.

and we will see how they do against them.

Who else have they scheduled that was either in the pre-season top 25 or ended the previous season in the top-25?

Chief Pote 04-22-2008 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 4699619)
1. DE doesn't become a 'priority' - it's still BPA available at #5.

2. Refer to #1 to realize that there isn't a viable OL option at the #5 pick.

Understood. However, I know everyone must see the irony of that choice. A sellout of the defense. Trade away a solid player and you gotta replace them immediately with your only hope for the future...the draft. Just puzzling.

bkkcoh 04-22-2008 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 4699601)
Oh I guess USC is a nobody? Once again :stupid: I dont know whats worse reading your crap or DaKcMans garbage.

TACKLES FOR LOSS TOT YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 15-1 0.5-1 1.0-5 - 2.0-23 - - 2.0-9 - 1.0-7 4.0-32 - 4.0-21 1.0-15

TOTAL TACKLES TOT YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 25-12 2-2 1-1 1-0 3-0 1-1 1-0 2-2 1-1 1-0 4-0 3-2 1-4 1-2



Those numbers are worthy of a #5 pick in the 1st round?
he wure was good against no-name opponents, wasn't he......

O$U Stats Link

the Talking Can 04-22-2008 10:10 AM

is Ghoulston really the next Merriman?

seems like after Merriman, everyone is searching for the next "Merriman" and guys who aren't as good have their value inflated..wasn't Merriman the #17-ish pick?

same with Adrien Peterson...because of him people are hot for McFadden when there is little reason or evidence to draft any RB that high...

I'd still much rather have Ellis than Ghoulston, if we aren't going to take Ryan....simply based on the value of their positions and wanting to finally shore up the middle of our defense

Chief Pote 04-22-2008 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkkcoh (Post 4699628)
TACKLES FOR LOSS UA-A YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 15-1 0.5-1 1.0-5 - 2.0-23 - - 2.0-9 - 1.0-7 4.0-32 - 4.0-21 1.0-15

TOTAL TACKLES UA-A YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 25-12 2-2 1-1 1-0 3-0 1-1 1-0 2-2 1-1 1-0 4-0 3-2 1-4 1-2



Those numbers are worthy of a #5 pick in the 1st round?
he wure was good against no-name opponents, wasn't he......

O$U Stats Link

Forget it....you're not going to convince the Buckeye haters. We'll see someone in the championship game in 09. :clap:

DaKCMan AP 04-22-2008 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefPote (Post 4699646)
We'll see someone in the championship game in 09. :clap:

ROFLROFLROFL

chiefscafan 04-22-2008 10:19 AM

well yes i know his ht weight but all I hear is he is a fit for 3-4 ds

how does he fit in our cover 2 4-3?

DaKCMan AP 04-22-2008 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefscafan (Post 4699652)
well yes i know his ht weight but all I hear is he is a fit for 3-4 ds

how does he fit in our cover 2 4-3?

He's 2" taller and about the same weight as Dwight Freeney.

Son of Logical 04-22-2008 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 4699527)
Your idea of tape would be? Not another youtube only homer, eh? Not attacking you or anything at all like that, I get tired of people who say they watch tape when all they do is watch a youtube clip. I am the first to say if my opinion on someone is speculation or I have actually watched the person play and really watched them, not just listened for when their name was announced.

No, I don't watch youtube. I actually kind of pay attention to OSU games, I knew Michael Whiley and ever since he went there I have somewhat followed OSU. I watched accouple of their games in 07, and yes he stood out, but he didn't dominate. A player that goes in the top 5 should dominate, I just never saw that from him. Maybe my watching tape thing was a little ambiguous, maybe "after watching him play this year" would of been better. I wouldn't be pissed if we picked him, but I think Dorsey or Ellis would be better.

Anyong Bluth 04-22-2008 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefPote (Post 4699646)
Forget it....you're not going to convince the Buckeye haters. We'll see someone in the championship game in 09. :clap:


Not arguing that tOSU isn't a quality squad, but why doesn't the Big10 do themselves a favor and get a damn Conf Championship game, and quit embarrassing themselves by backing into title games only to look like a joke and making the entire Big10 look overrated?

The BCS should require any team playing in the title game to be required to play a conf. championship game. If they don't, they can be selected for a different BCS game but not the title game.

As someone that doesn't have a dog in this fight, from my outside opinion, I'd have to agree that I think SEC players tend to make better pro players than the B10. Just my opinion, and that's just based off my gut instinct.

suds79 04-22-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cocina_Basement (Post 4699581)
By the way... wouldn't BPA probably be McFadden, since he's probably going to be there based on the latest projections.

Good question. But no we don't and here's why.

I certainly hope the Chiefs are taking this into account when determining the BPA.

IMO, part of evaluating BPA goes into what position they play. Ex: QB is a bigger impact position than say Safety. So if you have a QB and a Safety you rate pretty equal in the quality department, the push goes easily to QB because it's a much bigger impact position.

Now for McFadden. IMO, his BPA raiting (or whatever you call it) slips because RBs have a short life in the NFL and they're easy to find in the mid rounds (ex: Kolby Smith)

So that takes his value down.

Teams have got to take into account the position guys play.

Tribal Warfare 04-22-2008 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 4699456)
Peter King says Edwards likes Gholston.

Others say he Likes Ellis too

OnTheWarpath15 04-22-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 4699976)
Others say he Likes Ellis too

I think that the Dolphins have set this whole thing into motion, and it works out great for us.

J. Long
Dorsey
Ryan
C. Long
Ellis

AustinChief 04-22-2008 12:06 PM

I would definitely take Gholston over Ellis... but I certainly wouldn't throw a fit if Ellis is the pick.

Gholston will be a beast in the NFL.

El Jefe 04-22-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkkcoh (Post 4699628)
TACKLES FOR LOSS TOT YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 15-1 0.5-1 1.0-5 - 2.0-23 - - 2.0-9 - 1.0-7 4.0-32 - 4.0-21 1.0-15

TOTAL TACKLES TOT YSU AKRON WASH NU MINN PUR KENT MSU PSU WIS ILL MICH LSU
Gholston, V......... 25-12 2-2 1-1 1-0 3-0 1-1 1-0 2-2 1-1 1-0 4-0 3-2 1-4 1-2



Those numbers are worthy of a #5 pick in the 1st round?
he wure was good against no-name opponents, wasn't he......

O$U Stats Link



:lame: Your feeble attempts at trying to show me up are terrible. If you want to play the "stats are the most important thing" then lets play. The best DT in the draft according to bkkcoh is Tervor Laws because his stats are better than any DT's in the draft. :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.