<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFG0SPwxF24&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFG0SPwxF24&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I was thinking Jeff George

If the Chiefs were to pick up Brett, just think of all the possibilities:

- For the first time in NFL history, league officials would instantly modify the original season schedule so that our team would play in prime time (Sunday/Monday night football) for at least 2 games in 2008.

- John Madden's cruiser would always be parked at Arrowhead during the weekdays.

- The Chiefs would be the only club ever to have 2 HOF QBs end their careers on the sidelines injured while enduring a loss in the playoffs.

- Favre and Croyle would have their own line of hunting gear (with the "Brett & Brody" label) which would be exclusively available at Cabela's.

We are "getting younger" why would Herm sign a great, but old QB??

I respect him, but he should go out with dignity. A lot of people thought he should have retired years ago, and he proved he can still play, why change that?

Not good for a career, when you are the franchise for years and then switch to another team. Let's see...

1. Emmitt Smith
2. Michael Jordan
3. Willie Mays
4. Joe Montana

No thanks, we've already get a QB who can throw interceptions AND he's young

"He'd make the Chiefs a better team for a year or two, ala Joe Montana."


Exactly. I'd like to see us get better for the long haul, not two seasons.

Who started this moronic thread?


Oh, Gunther Fan. Check...

it won't happen.

which would come first the sacks or the interceptions
defenses would be in a high pitched drooling fever

We don't want him.

Just say no.

Bringing in Favre would be one step forward, two steps backward.

Unless Doc Brown can fix the flux capacitor and start up the deLorean so that the Chiefs get the '96 version of Favre, this would be a bad move for many reasons. In the last three seasons he's only thrown four more touchdowns than picks, and 100 of his passes in the last five years have been caught by guys wearing the other team's jersey; in the playoffs since 2000 he's thrown more interceptions than touchdowns.

Add to that his salary, salary cap implications, and whatever draft picks we would have to give up in order to get him in a trade. Oh yeah, and learning a new playbook and getting a rhythm and timing down with all new team mates in six weeks.


No thank you, I don't want another quick fix that will fall short and set us even further back.

Skip that joker........is all I can muster. Is it football season yet?

he ain't coming here. just forget it

PRO FOOTBALL; Chiefs and 49ers Come to Terms on Montana Trade


By TOM FRIEND,
Published: April 21, 1993

Joe Montana, who helped the 49ers win four Super Bowls and was urged by fans to run for mayor, is officially leaving San Francisco.

Tonight, the 49ers traded the 36-year-old quarterback -- along with safety David Whitmore and a 1994 third-round draft pick -- to Kansas City for the Chiefs' first-round selection (the 18th over all) in the National Football League draft on Sunday.
Well with three more years on Farve than were on Montana, I say Third pick this year and fourth next. Nothing else.

We've got a nice start at rebuilding with this last draft, IMO. If Croyle does wash out, we'll pick high again, and have a chance to get one of the best QB's in the draft, along with high picks for other postitions.

Favre would make us better. He'd make us mediocre again, and we all know how that's worked out.