ROFL

But your post exposes you, Mr. Brock. I am clearly on the factual side of the argument, you are obviously wrong. Whatever my opinions are about Cunningham's current performance, your aspersions on his past accomplishments are manifestly wrong and biased.

I never realized you were so interested in fashion.

So - he's had two good years out of 9?

Woot!


:rolleyes:

What sucks is that our MLB will allow the dunk pass in the middle of the field that the MLB is supposed to cover but then will give up YAC yards when we miss tackles or overpurse or find a LB out of his zone area and the reciever usually breaks it to the outside while we're trying to bring his ass down usually allowing our Corners to make the tackle chasing him down. We do have hard hitting safeties but they have been known to get burnt or go for the strip to often or simply too slow.

Yeah, you're on the factual side of an argument, touting accomplishments from 11 years ago like they mean something. Gunther isn't good and hasn't been for a long, long time, I guess is the point, though it sails over your head.

I guess I should point out that Gunther flips the finger to the other team after they just clowned him better than any NFL coach I've ever seen.

I don't understand why KCJ constantly feels the urge to prove his ineptitude.

I was right, Brock was wrong on ths point, that's all there is to that.
He said the game passed Cunningham by over a decade ago, and 11 years ago the Chiefs had the most dominant defense in the NFL under Cunningham's leadership.

The question was not, "is Cunningham still a good d-coord?" The question was, "did the game pass Gunther Cunningham by over a decade ago?" Brock is fond of quoting others ad infinitum. Its only fair to give him his due.

Next?

Pat Thomas is Gunther's handpicked middle linebacker.

Link?
:spock:

The army must be a lot like junior high school.

The weakest link is between Herman Edwards ears and the dumb ass who hired him.

:shake:

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: