ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs You say luck, I say FU. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192898)

SAUTO 09-29-2008 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5066396)
It was good, but dominant? No way. With 4 turnovers we were still in position to win the game. I give all the credit in the world to KC for an intense game, but I wouldn't use the word dominant.
When were you in position to win?? IIRC WE were up 7 and RAN the ball down YOUR throats ton seal a W. the T.O.'S werent LUCK they were what happens when players are put in a position to succeed

Hootie 09-29-2008 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5067117)
That call wasn't going to get reversed. Possesion was never established by the offense and Champ got the interception and was down by contact. The fumble was a bad blown whistle, but SD still had a change to stop the TD and the 2 point conversion. There was nothing lucky about going on 4th getting six and then getting 2 with the exact same play. In the Saints game our guy was not offsides. His foot might have been in the neutral zone, but had he been the ref would have called it. It just looks that way from the camera angle using an unofficial line/
LMAOLMAOLMAO

tmax63 09-29-2008 07:05 PM
Garcia, the ref's gift makes the Donko's 2-2. You call pass interference when the ex-Donko O'Neal does an arm bar on Bowe in the NE game and the Chiefs could well be 2-2 as well. If the queen had balls she'd be king. The Donkos aren't a very good 3-1 team and I think the Chiefs are a good 1-3 team. There isn't as much difference between the 2 teams as many of the talking heads think IMHO.

Frazod 09-29-2008 07:09 PM
We could be 2-2.
Denver SHOULD BE 2-2.

Hammock Parties 09-29-2008 07:16 PM
Vulture, any more skanks? I want to see your nightlife escapades.

prhom 09-29-2008 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5067117)
That call wasn't going to get reversed. Possesion was never established by the offense and Champ got the interception and was down by contact. The fumble was a bad blown whistle, but SD still had a change to stop the TD and the 2 point conversion. There was nothing lucky about going on 4th getting six and then getting 2 with the exact same play. In the Saints game our guy was not offsides. His foot might have been in the neutral zone, but had he been the ref would have called it. It just looks that way from the camera angle using an unofficial line/
I don't know man, even here in Denver a lot of people think the Broncos have been lucky. You can argue that the Broncos would have been good enough to still win even if those things had gone the other way, but you can't sit here and tell me that Champ intercepted that ball against SD. That being said, I'd still rather be lucky than good I guess.

Marcellus 09-29-2008 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5066396)
It was good, but dominant? No way. With 4 turnovers we were still in position to win the game. I give all the credit in the world to KC for an intense game, but I wouldn't use the word dominant.
This is correct. Had we not played conservative football in the red zone 2x in the first quarter against a team with a bad pass defense we could have opened the can of whoopass.

I will take the convincing win though.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.