ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Bradford Please (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199979)

Tribal Warfare 01-08-2009 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5371613)
he should stay in school, lots to work on

Bradford didn't have a bad game his WRs decided to choke at critical moments

Sure-Oz 01-08-2009 10:58 PM

He should stay put

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2009 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 5371209)
I am among the least qualified people on this board to have an opinion on this, but in reality, I think I'm tied with 3/4 of the board for that title.

But the kid looks like he could be Trent Green 2.0. I would welcome that.

Trent's success was a product of the monster line we had. Period.

the Talking Can 01-08-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5371630)
Funny how people can watch the same game and see such different things.

Bradford is as good as any college QB I've seen at putting the ball where he wants to. He's just unbelievably accurate. He throws a tight ball and has a great head on his shoulders.

The kid looks a lot like Pennington before the shoulder injuries. Remember, before his arm got jacked up, CP was the next big thing. I'd take Bradford at #3 in a heartbeat. I still like Stafford a little more, but I like Bradford more than Sanchez (blasphemer!!) Get him on a weight program, plug him in for the last few games of '09 and ready to rock in '10.

he's accurate when he has great protection....when he has pressure, not so much as tonight made clear...hell Tebow is much better under pressure than Bradford...and I wouldn't draft tebow to play qb

DeezNutz 01-08-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5371625)
That would be a dream and guarantee we got 1 of the 2 main guys

Yep. Everyone talks about Bradford's frame being able to put on more weight, but I'm not convinced this is a certainty. He needs to return and prove he's not Croyle-like physically.

Chiefnj2 01-08-2009 10:59 PM

Bradford is very accurate and throws a great ball. As a pure passer he's better than Sanchez and Stafford. But, he needs a ton of work. He should go back to school. If he declares he'll have to sit an entire year. On two key plays he threw short to guys that were covered.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5371631)
If you could choose between him, Stafford, or Sanchez, why on earth would anyone pick Bradford?

Because accuracy wins football games and Bradford's the most accurate passer, without question.

crazycoffey 01-08-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5371615)
and threw the ball late, when the WR ran into double coverage

it was a poor throw


I'm not a bradford fan, but now I'm not sure we watched the same game. Bradford was threading the needle all over the field. His WR's let him down. I've seen that same throw sprout excessive man love when trent threw it to Tony several times....

Sure-Oz 01-08-2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5371638)
Trent's success was a product of the monster line we had. Period.

This

I'd rather have a possible Aikman or Elway than a Green

DJ's left nut 01-08-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5371639)
he's accurate when he has great protection....when he has pressure, not so much as tonight made clear...hell Tebow is much better under pressure than Bradford...and I wouldn't draft tebow to play qb

This is nonsense. He made a great TD throw under pressure, his other TD throw was setup by another strong throw under pressure.

I think y'all just work backwards. "That was a good throw, he must not have been under pressure." "Man, that throw sucked, must've been pressure."

The anti-bradford folks are more guilty of seeing what they want to see that Carl Peterson ever was.

Nevermind the fact that the point of the game is to provide your QB protection. We don't draft a QB for what he can do with 1 second in the pocket. When given average time in the pocket, he made great throws. That's what he'll need at the next level and that's something we damn sure better be providing any QB we bring in. He threw the best ball when given okay time of anyone in CFB this year. Today he made many good throws with pressure on him. That's absolutely a guy worth having.

MahiMike 01-08-2009 11:05 PM

My choice is Bradford too. Of all the throws I saw tonite, His were all right on the money or damn close to it. Neither pick was his fault. Unlike Tebow who stared down his guys and threw right to the defense. I'd be ok w/Bradford.

MahiMike 01-08-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5371649)
This

I'd rather have a possible Aikman or Elway than a Green

Maybe so but Trent was the best QB this franchise ever had.

smittysbar 01-08-2009 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5371635)
Bradford didn't have a bad game his WRs decided to choke at critical moments

:clap: I think people on here watched a different game. Kid is good, I wasn't big on him but he showed some shit tonight.

RustShack 01-08-2009 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5371638)
Trent's success was a product of the monster line we had. Period.

Sounds like Bradford at Oklahoma, except Bustford also is the product of the spread offense on top of that.

Mr. Arrowhead 01-08-2009 11:10 PM

Memo to Detroit
Just look at the stats they are undeniable, how can you not draft Bradford, you dont want Stafford.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.