ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 11 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Why does everyone keep saying we don't need a Tackle at #3? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202328)

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-13-2009 05:02 PM
NO!! **** NO!!

WHAT DON'T YOU ****ING UNDERSTAND?

DaneMcCloud 02-13-2009 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5488717)
He's really a LT but he could play RT for a year or so. Or Pioli and Haley could move Albert to RT. Now remember this isn't what I want first and foremost. It's an alternative.

I do think since we have a new regime that something like drafting an OT is a possibility.


PhilFree:arrow:
Albert's NOT a right tackle. He plays in space very well. Ideally, your right tackle should be 6'5 to 6'6 and around 325 pounds He should also be a freaking road grader. The right side is your power side and is not suited for finesse players.

Furthermore, the Chiefs would be ****ing idiots to have $75 MILLION dollars wrapped in TWO left tackles. ****ing dumb. Is this what you think of Pioli and Hunt? Two ****ing morons?

I swear, if an unbelievable kicker was sitting at the #3 overall pick, there would be a large portion of the fan base screaming for the Chiefs to draft a kicker at number 3.

Bank on it.

The Franchise 02-13-2009 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5488906)
Albert's NOT a right tackle. He plays in space very well. Ideally, your right tackle should be 6'5 to 6'6 and around 325 pounds He should also be a freaking road grader. The right side is your power side and is not suited for finesse players.

Furthermore, the Chiefs would be ****ing idiots to have $75 MILLION dollars wrapped in TWO left tackles. ****ing dumb. Is this what you think of Pioli and Hunt? Two ****ing morons?

I swear, if an unbelievable kicker was sitting at the #3 overall pick, there would be a large portion of the fan base screaming for the Chiefs to draft a kicker at number 3.

Bank on it.
Our entire line could be set for the next 10 years (minus Brian Waters) and people would want to draft a LT at #3 and move Albert to LG. I don't get it.

cdcox 02-13-2009 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5486933)
How many first round picks do you need on the offensive line?
Counting backups?

Brock 02-13-2009 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5488942)
Counting backups?
LMAO

DaneMcCloud 02-13-2009 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5488931)
Our entire line could be set for the next 10 years (minus Brian Waters) and people would want to draft a LT at #3 and move Albert to LG. I don't get it.
I expect Herb Taylor to step right in when Waters is injured or retires without missing a beat.

OnTheWarpath15 02-13-2009 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5488942)
Counting backups?
LMAO

Awesome.

Rain Man 02-13-2009 05:57 PM
I don't think anyone should pass a guy over solely on position. Is a QB more valuable? Heck, yeah. If the prospects are both projected to be very good, take the QB. But if the best QB projects out to be an average NFL QB and the best RT projects out to be Thor the god of thunder, I'd take the RT.

philfree 02-13-2009 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5488906)
Albert's NOT a right tackle. He plays in space very well. Ideally, your right tackle should be 6'5 to 6'6 and around 325 pounds He should also be a freaking road grader. The right side is your power side and is not suited for finesse players.

Furthermore, the Chiefs would be ****ing idiots to have $75 MILLION dollars wrapped in TWO left tackles. ****ing dumb. Is this what you think of Pioli and Hunt? Two ****ing morons?

I swear, if an unbelievable kicker was sitting at the #3 overall pick, there would be a large portion of the fan base screaming for the Chiefs to draft a kicker at number 3.

Bank on it.
I have no idea what the Chiefs are gonna do but I'm sure if they don't do what you think they should you'll be the first to call them "****ing idiots". Now I never said I wanted to draft an OT what I said is that it may be more of an option then alot of people think if the QBs are gone. Sling all the F bombs you want though.

PhilFree:arrow:

DaneMcCloud 02-13-2009 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5489273)
I have no idea what the Chiefs are gonna do but I'm sure if they don't do what you think they should you'll be the first to call them "****ing idiots". Now I never said I wanted to draft an OT what I said is that it may be more of an option then alot of people think if the QBs are gone. Sling all the F bombs you want though.

PhilFree:arrow:
Thanks, I will.

If the Chiefs draft a Left Tackle with the number three overall pick, I'll go absolutely ballistic.

And I hardly doubt I'd be the only one.

Mecca 02-13-2009 07:33 PM
Malcolm Jenkins has the realistic probability of being significantly better than any of the CB's currently on the Chiefs, you'd be pretty hard pressed to get a rookie OT to play better than Albert did last year.

philfree 02-13-2009 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5489281)
Thanks, I will.

If the Chiefs draft a Left Tackle with the number three overall pick, I'll go absolutely ballistic.

And I hardly doubt I'd be the only one.

So who's the best pick if it's not a QB?And remember I want a QB. My posts on this thread are about if one isn't available.



PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 02-13-2009 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5489298)
So who's the best pick if it's not a QB?And remember I want a QB. My posts on this thread are about if one isn't available.



PhilFree:arrow:
I think it's been covered several times now.

philfree 02-13-2009 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5489283)
Malcolm Jenkins has the realistic probability of being significantly better than any of the CB's currently on the Chiefs, you'd be pretty hard pressed to get a rookie OT to play better than Albert did last year.
So is Jenkins worthy of the 3rd pick in your not so humble opinion?


PhilFree:arrow:

philfree 02-13-2009 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5489308)
I think it's been covered several times now.
That was specific for Dane. So you think it's Jenkins?


PhilFree:arrow:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 PM.
Page 4 of 11 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.