Someone will take Dorsey for sure. Probably New Orleans.

We could probably only get a 2nd or 3rd for Hali. /first dipshit in/

Why would New Orleans want Dorsey? They already have Ellis tied up in a big contract.

I'll answer anyway, because now there are more options for us to draft at that spot. Raji and Curry are now legit options. Doesn't still mean we won't take Sanchez, but it does lower the percentage.

DJ........Tank...Raji...Catfish.......Peppers
..............Barton.....Scott

front 7

Did you miss the /dipshit/ part of my post?

just bitching about not knowing what is going on....lame lame lame

Curry is still not a legitimate option.

Curry is less of an option in a 3-4 because he's not a rush backer. You don't take a ILB in a 3-4 with a top 5 pick. Raji may be an option if they find a way to get rid of Dorsey. Especially considering that we can grab Brace in the 2nd round to play NT.

Yep I did....sorry...its early.

DJ.......Turk...Tank...Catfish......Peppers
..............Curry....Scott

either way looks better than what we had

Did going to the 3-4 magically transform Curry into a dominant rush backer?

Is that why he's now a legit option? Because I'm having a difficult time understanding the logic.

This switch, if it indeed happens, didn't do anything to alter the value of the players on the board.

He's bitching that the Chiefs are keeping the titles of the assistant coaches secret but telling Schefter that they are switching to a 3-4.

Since, you know, Schefter is now right about everything he posts since he was right about the Rat.

Petro is another that lost alot of access once Carl and his cronies left.

so shefter knows that we are going to the 3-4 but still doesn't know WHO our defensive coordinator is?

:spock:

I wouldn't like that pick either, but it could be more justfiable. If you go defense now, I think Raji is the guy, unless someone like Brown runs a sub 4.5 forty or something crazy.