ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs on the clock report (nfl network.) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205851)

KcFanInGA 04-13-2009 05:20 PM
We are going D in this draft. Our Offense actually scored a decent amount last year, so I have a feeling Pioli and Haley will be looking D for sure. I agree with waiting on a safety after watching Berry, and I see good Oline choices in this draft, so Im hoping we go that route.

KcFanInGA 04-13-2009 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5666374)
Personally I'm leaning Raji no NT for a 3-4 equals complete suck.
But can Raji play in the 4-3? They said we'd probably be using a mix this year, working into the 3-4 slowly. If he can then he'd make sense there.

Mecca 04-13-2009 05:23 PM
Well he's been in a 4-3 in college...

RUSH 04-13-2009 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GonzoRox88 (Post 5666224)
And with the 3rd overall pick in the 2009 draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select:

Name: Jesus Christ

Position: Our Lord and Savior

School: Jerusalem State
LOL...well played sir

DTLB58 04-13-2009 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5666374)
Personally I'm leaning Raji no NT for a 3-4 equals complete suck.
Holy crap! We agree!

:doh!:

DTLB58 04-13-2009 05:35 PM
Mayock just said Monroe OT.

DaneMcCloud 04-13-2009 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcFanInGA (Post 5666383)
We are going D in this draft.
No.

This is a terrible year for defensive players. 2010 is the year for defensive players.

Why go against the draft? If you do that, it's called reaching.

The Chiefs need as many as three offensive lineman (four if Waters is moved).

It may not be "sexy" but this is the year for the line.

ToxSocks 04-13-2009 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 5666473)
Mayock just said Monroe OT.
As long as he plays RT.....I guess

htismaqe 04-13-2009 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcFanInGA (Post 5666392)
But can Raji play in the 4-3? They said we'd probably be using a mix this year, working into the 3-4 slowly. If he can then he'd make sense there.
Most have said he's better-suited to be a 4-3 undertackle actually.

htismaqe 04-13-2009 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5666367)
Since there are no bonafide studs, the next move is to take the player you think is most likely to be a good player for you, regardless of position, but taking need into account. Your moving Curry would be all well and good IF THEY COULD TRADE THE PICK AND GET CURRY AT A LOWER SPOT. Since there is no publicly known likelihood of that, your codicil makes no sense.
I don't care if other teams are stupid enough to draft the guy in the top 5. I just hope the Chiefs aren't.

htismaqe 04-13-2009 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5666476)
No.

This is a terrible year for defensive players. 2010 is the year for defensive players.

Why go against the draft? If you do that, it's called reaching.

The Chiefs need as many as three offensive lineman (four if Waters is moved).

It may not be "sexy" but this is the year for the line.
I don't have a problem with taking linemen with every pick EXCEPT the #3 overall.

Priest31kc 04-13-2009 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5666476)
No.

This is a terrible year for defensive players. 2010 is the year for defensive players.

Why go against the draft? If you do that, it's called reaching.

The Chiefs need as many as three offensive lineman (four if Waters is moved).

It may not be "sexy" but this is the year for the line.
Agreed, we got our QB, lets go get offense this offseason. It'll make us exciting to watch, get fans back, and we'll improve the defense next offseason and hopefully be major contenders in 2010.

Mecca 04-13-2009 06:14 PM
I'm fine other than we shouldn't be taking an offensive lineman with a top 3 pick.

evolve27 04-13-2009 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5666591)
I'm fine other than we shouldn't be taking an offensive lineman with a top 3 pick.
Zach Thomas signing speaks volumes or does it? The 2009 Mike Mayock NFL Draft is gonna blow up this year at pick 3.

Mecca 04-13-2009 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by evolve27 (Post 5666675)
Zach Thomas signing speaks volumes or does it?
What if BJ Raji is their guy?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.