ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fatlock wants Coffman in KC (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206302)

KCrockaholic 04-21-2009 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88 (Post 5692654)
We just drafted Cottam last year.

So Cottam is quaranteed to be a good TE in this league? What will we do when all we have is Cottam and Tony is gone? It doesnt appear that your thinking about the future.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5692671)
Hes not a "can't miss" prospect, but he is very athletic for a TE. He was actually a Wide Reciever in High School, I lived right next to him basically, but he has put on around 40 pounds since he got to Mizzou and he still has room to grow.

He's not athletic in to what I'm comparing him to. He looks like a slow white kid with no athletic talent next to guys like Jared Cook and Cornelius Ingram.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:13 PM

Why are we having a debate about a guy who isn't even a top 4 player at his position?

Oh yea he went to Missouri.

Pablo 04-21-2009 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5692674)
So Cottam is quaranteed to be a good TE in this league? What will we do when all we have is Cottam and Tony is gone? It doesnt appear that your thinking about the future.

I hope the future entails the TE position pretty much blocking and catching a couple balls a game because we have 2 good WR's and a OL and RB that can punch the ball into the endzone if need be.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:16 PM

If you wanna pimp a TE go with this guy..

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nw4HPrF9skI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nw4HPrF9skI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

KCrockaholic 04-21-2009 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5692675)
He's not athletic in to what I'm comparing him to. He looks like a slow white kid with no athletic talent next to guys like Jared Cook and Cornelius Ingram.

I know hes not the athlete that Cook and Ingram are but hes a football player, it isnt all about being athletic. He is fairly athletic when compared to those two, but for a Tightend hes better than most.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:18 PM

No, he's not. The game is different...the TE position is much much more athletic than it use to be and it continues to change that way.

It's why people question Brandon Pettigrew as a high pick that kind of TE is not what's in anymore.

KCrockaholic 04-21-2009 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88 (Post 5692678)
I hope the future entails the TE position pretty much blocking and catching a couple balls a game because we have 2 good WR's and a OL and RB that can punch the ball into the endzone if need be.

So what is wrong with having that extra weapon at Tightend along with that other stuff? I dont want a Jason Dunn as our starting TE. Each team needs somebody that will line-up inside and can attack the middle each play.

Pablo 04-21-2009 11:19 PM

Holy shit, that's a fast 40 for a dude that big.

KCrockaholic 04-21-2009 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5692685)
No, he's not. The game is different...the TE position is much much more athletic than it use to be and it continues to change that way.

It's why people question Brandon Pettigrew as a high pick that kind of TE is not what's in anymore.

You cant compare him to Pettigrew :rolleyes: Coffman is nearly the opposite of Pettigrew besides the speed and run-after-catch abilities.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:21 PM

This how a TE stretches the field.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/saxhQG9Smhk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/saxhQG9Smhk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Pablo 04-21-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5692686)
So what is wrong with having that extra weapon at Tightend along with that other stuff? I dont want a Jason Dunn as our starting TE. Each team needs somebody that will line-up inside and can attack the middle each play.

Nothing's wrong with it as long as we don't give up a 3rd or 4th round pick in a OL heavy class with an absolutely shit OL.

I'd rather give Cottam the shot to be the man when Tony leaves, and if he struggles and a great, can't miss prospect comes our way with size, speed, and a great skill-set in a draft down the line, then so be it.

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5692689)
You cant compare him to Pettigrew :rolleyes: Coffman is nearly the opposite of Pettigrew besides the speed and run-after-catch abilities.

You know Chase Coffmans scouting report basically says he's an average blocker from the spread that doesn't have much wiggle or shiftiness after the catch?

Mecca 04-21-2009 11:23 PM

http://www.draftcountdown.com/scouti...se-Coffman.php

Read the scouting report.

Reaper16 04-21-2009 11:24 PM

I do kinda think that Coffman will be a productive offensive player in the NFL provided he lands with the right team. His hands are pretty incredible.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.