ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft I'm going to post this analysis for fun, cause draft talk is all that matters (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206560)

Dave Lane 04-25-2009 07:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 5704050)
That seems like pretty solid analysis. If we are stuck at #3, Raji makes sense to me. I was especially persuaded by the argument against Jackson...that without a viable NT, he's going to really struggle.
Dorsey is the same size as Raji but would have to bulk up to play NT. I think he could do in a pinch. I'd want to see about trade possibilities for him if we draft Raji.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 08:12 AM
I firmly believe the coaches think Dorsey can play NT.

If it comes down to this, the pick is gonna be Crabtree.

milkman 04-25-2009 08:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5704391)
No, of course not. Sanchez is the only QB worth having. Sanchez would wipe his ass with Manning's beard, if Manning could grow a beard.

I wonder if five years from now everyone will really remember where they were on the side of this argument. Other than Mecca, I haven't really paid much attention to who is convinced that Sanchez will be great.

I guess I am going to have to start taking notes on who says what.
OK.

Write it down.

Sanchez is going to be an elite QB in the NFL.

DTLB58 04-25-2009 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5704554)
I firmly believe the coaches think Dorsey can play NT.

If it comes down to this, the pick is gonna be Crabtree.
If that's true, I would agree.

I have said for a couple of weeks, Raji.

I also said I would LOVE to have Crabtree, but oh, the poor defense.

This guy really seems to have his thumb on it. WOW. Very good article IMO.

Every Chiefs fan needs to read this before the draft today.

Reerun_KC 04-25-2009 08:35 AM
We still need a QB!

Thigpen is a ****ing joke, we need someone to develop for the QBoTF.

DTLB58 04-25-2009 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5704053)
By the time I finish reading that, KC will have already picked...
Nah, Plus it's realy worth it.

Rep for Mecca :clap:

Pasta Little Brioni 04-25-2009 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5704139)
Herm didn't destroy our value at 3 and remove our second rounder by trading for a backup quarterback.
So, what happens if Sanchez goes #2 overall??? If they hadn't made the Cassel trade, they would be in the same spot only without any viable QB option at all. I'm not sold at all on Cassel, but he at least has a shot to be a good QB in this league.

Sure I would love to have Sanchez, but I don't think Pioli was willing to take the risk of the 2 QB's going 1,2.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 09:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTLBRonaldCurryFan (Post 5704591)
If that's true, I would agree.

I have said for a couple of weeks, Raji.

I also said I would LOVE to have Crabtree, but oh, the poor defense.

This guy really seems to have his thumb on it. WOW. Very good article IMO.

Every Chiefs fan needs to read this before the draft today.
This draft isn't a good defensive draft. I doubt (and I hope) Pioli doesn't have tunnel vision. We don't NEED to fix the defense right now. This is a long-term rebuild and next year's draft is much more conducive to fixing the defense.

Sully 04-25-2009 09:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5704393)
Two of the ex-GMs on NFL Network just said 10 minutes ago that Sanchez is the more NFL-ready of the two QB's available. They seem to think he'll be fine.

And Klingler and Shuler both played in run and shoot offenses in college. There's not a comparison there.
Did Tennessee use the Run and Shoot?
I honestly don't remember.

Ebolapox 04-25-2009 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully (Post 5704658)
Did Tennessee use the Run and Shoot?
I honestly don't remember.
yeah, I don't recall tennessee using the run/shoot back then. then again, I was 12 years old when he was drafted (1995). I barely remember shuler.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-25-2009 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5704391)
No, of course not. Sanchez is the only QB worth having. Sanchez would wipe his ass with Manning's beard, if Manning could grow a beard.

I wonder if five years from now everyone will really remember where they were on the side of this argument. Other than Mecca, I haven't really paid much attention to who is convinced that Sanchez will be great.

I guess I am going to have to start taking notes on who says what.
Take this Dick-tation, Nonsensical:

Mark Sanchez WILL be a great, Pro Bowl Quarterback in the National Football League, and will walk on water long before the 1st Messiah Cassel.

Buck 04-25-2009 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5704373)
Were the lengths of the contracts the same? That may have played a part.

I remembering him holding for the money he 'would have' gotten. I thought he got it.

Don't forget that the Pats typically get their picks into camp on time. Doing something like that would likely cause a holdout.
All their contracts were for 5 years.

There is precedent in this.

It would be surprising, and unorthodox, but I wouldn't be 100% surprised if the Chiefs let the clock run out on them.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.