ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rufus Lives!!!!!!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206994)

Mr. Krab 04-29-2009 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5727255)
I dont like it, but i wont cry about it.

When we take turns banging your mom on the weekends, how do you feel about that?


:p

kcxiv 04-29-2009 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab's (Post 5727274)
When we take turns banging your mom on the weekends, how do you feel about that?


:p

If she lets you, go for it. None of my business what she does in her sex life. lol

Mr. Krab 04-29-2009 08:04 PM

Well you have to give it up to kcxiv, dude is mellow. ROFL

wild1 04-29-2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727042)
The thing is, if Pioli TRULY doesn't care what the fans or media think, he wouldn't tolerate somebody like Rufus Dawes publishing stuff like this on the OFFICIAL team website.

Actually, I'm more inclined to think he doesn't get involved in this side of things.

He seems like a guy for whom it's all about football. Football isn't the main thing, it's the only thing.

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 5727326)
Actually, I'm more inclined to think he doesn't get involved in this side of things.

He seems like a guy for whom it's all about football. Football isn't the main thing, it's the only thing.

See, that doesn't jive.

They've been on information lockdown for weeks, with everybody on their dog scared that if they talk, they'll be fired.

Yet we're expected to believe that at the same time, the guy is completely OBLIVIOUS to what's being published on the official team website and he really doesn't care.

Reaper16 04-29-2009 08:36 PM

What makes us think that this is the same writer as the one using the Rufus Dawes pseudonym during the Carl Peterson era?

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-29-2009 08:37 PM

WTF????

WGAF????

BFD!

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-29-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5727426)
What makes us think that this is the same writer as the one using the Rufus Dawes pseudonym during the Carl Peterson era?

It's not. I'd bet the farm on it.

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5727426)
What makes us think that this is the same writer as the one using the Rufus Dawes pseudonym during the Carl Peterson era?

Even if it's not, what is the purpose? Why keep something from the previous regime when it's simultaneously useless and controversial to the fans?

DeezNutz 04-29-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5727426)
What makes us think that this is the same writer as the one using the Rufus Dawes pseudonym during the Carl Peterson era?

Nice thought.

Perhaps. One would think a new pseudonym would be in order, however, so as not to inspire lingering hard feelings.

Reaper16 04-29-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727443)
Even if it's not, what is the purpose? Why keep something from the previous regime when it's simultaneously useless and controversial to the fans?

I agree with you; I know I hate the columns.

But does anyone in the Chiefs fanbase outside the forum posters & talk show callers really think they're controversial?

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5727444)
Nice thought.

Perhaps. One would think a new pseudonym would be in order, however, so as not to inspire lingering hard feelings.

This.

htismaqe 04-29-2009 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5727457)
I agree with you; I know I hate the columns.

But does anyone in the Chiefs fanbase outside the forum posters & talk show callers really think they're controversial?

The forum posters and talk show callers think Rufus is BLATANTLY ANTAGONISTIC, which is what makes his existence controversial.

DeezNutz 04-29-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5727457)
I agree with you; I know I hate the columns.

But does anyone in the Chiefs fanbase outside the forum posters & talk show callers really think they're controversial?

Who else is reading the crap on the site outside of these types of fans, who are generally the hardcore?

Reaper16 04-29-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5727465)
The forum posters and talk show callers think Rufus is BLATANTLY ANTAGONISTIC, which is what makes his existence controversial.

They're right, he is.

But we're a minority of the fanbase.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.