ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 7 123 4 567
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 3-3 after six games. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214347)

MahiMike 09-17-2009 10:33 AM
I think 3-3 is definitely doable. I say we beat Oakland, Philly (Vick factor), Washington.

KCrockaholic 09-17-2009 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6081196)
Eh, call it luck or capitalizing off the Ravens' mistakes or whatever... my point was geared much more towards the part about how, if we played like that every week, we won't be tied with 5 minutes to go in the game. I don't care if it was the mighty Ravens last week and the lowly Raiders this week... let's do that again and see how it turns out.



Guess that's why I said...



And, no, I'm not a scout or a coach or a player, so unless I wanted to go back and focus on specific players, why would I want to watch that game again? So I can start overanalyzing and seeing things that weren't there?
Thats a fair statement considering your not interested in breaking down a game. Usually people dont just go back to watch a game for "specific" players. Usually its to see what your team did wrong in certain circumstances. And to see what they could do better to improve upon. No, your opinion wont matter to the Chiefs. But its still fun IMO to go back and break it down. I see why someone would want to do this. You just need to have the right mindset to WANT to do it.

Quesadilla Joe 09-17-2009 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6080976)
I have watched the Ravens game a few times. The more I watch it, the better I feel about this team.
How so? I downloaded the game and only watched the first 3 quarters and I thought the Ravens did whatever they wanted against KC.

They made Flacco (a QB who threw just as many TD's as INT's last year) look like an All Pro. Flacco had all day to throw and his WR's were always open.

The Ravens don't have a lot of talent at the skill positions on offense and they moved the ball easily.

Take away a fluke blocked punt and a bad pass by Flacco and the Ravens would have won 48-10

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6081110)
I think the problem is we havent proven to be able to stop the running game. Skins can control the clock and pound away at 4 yards a carry and pick up first down after first down. Sure, he may not break out a 75 yard run like he did in Denver. But he can still pick up 10 runs of 75 yards and it all adds up the same way.

Way to bail him out. He didn't say that. He pointed to Portis' stats as a Redskin.

The fact is he has been effective, but not nearly as effective as he was as a Bronco.... which was my point.

Now, as far the Redskins..... I agree with what they will try to do.... I don't think they pass early and I think the Chiefs will be able to control the LOS better and get the Skins off the field early in the game.

Dogfight.... but again, they have the Eagles in the game after us.... and the Panthers before us. I just expect a bit of a let down.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081224)
How so. I downloaded the game and only watched the first 3 quarters and I thought the Ravens did whatever they wanted against KC.

They made Flacco (a QB who threw just as many TD's as INT's last year) look like an All Pro. Flacco had all day to throw and his WR's were always open.

The Ravens don't have a lot of talent at the skill positions at offense and they moved the ball easily.

Take away a fluke blocked punt and a bad pass by Flacco and the Ravens would have won 48-10

Yeah, yeah, take away this and that and the other....

And, if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.

The Franchise 09-17-2009 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081225)
Way to bail him out. He didn't say that. He pointed to Portis' stats as a Redskin.

The fact is he has been effective, but not nearly as effective as he was as a Bronco.... which was my point.

Now, as far the Redskins..... I agree with what they will try to do.... I don't think they pass early and I think the Chiefs will be able to control the LOS better and get the Skins off the field early in the game.

Dogfight.... but again, they have the Eagles in the game after us.... and the Panthers before us. I just expect a bit of a let down.
Dude.....I'm agreeing with you that the Redskins are the one of the 2 NFC East teams that we have a chance to beat. I'm just saying....you can't compare him to when he was with the Broncos....that shit was 5 ****ing years ago.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6081221)
I think 3-3 is definitely doable. I say we beat Oakland, Philly (Vick factor), Washington.
Now, two drops of optimism in a puddle of darkness.

KCrockaholic 09-17-2009 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081225)
Way to bail him out. He didn't say that. He pointed to Portis' stats as a Redskin.

The fact is he has been effective, but not nearly as effective as he was as a Bronco.... which was my point.

Now, as far the Redskins..... I agree with what they will try to do.... I don't think they pass early and I think the Chiefs will be able to control the LOS better and get the Skins off the field early in the game.

Dogfight.... but again, they have the Eagles in the game after us.... and the Panthers before us. I just expect a bit of a let down.
Dude... I didnt bail anybody out. I was hardly following the conversation when I typed it lol. I was just giving my opinion on it and letting you know the way I see it.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6081239)
Dude.....I'm agreeing with you that the Redskins are the one of the 2 NFC East teams that we have a chance to beat. I'm just saying....you can't compare him to when he was with the Broncos....that shit was 5 ****ing years ago.
Agreed... as I said, he is OLDER..... but even the following two years with the Redskins are not as good.

I am just giving you shit.... well, because I can. I mean, what else is there to do when I am ignoring the large stack of work on my desk....lol.

Anyways... I am just trying to stir the pot a little. I am sick of the pessimistic attitudes.

Yeah, the Chiefs migh go 4-12... but I don't have to expect that at this point. I can expect more and then be greatly dissapointed later... I mean, I have done it for the last 20 years.... why stop now?

Bearcat 09-17-2009 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081183)
Man, you guys take things waaaay too seriously.

Look, I picked out two games that I think the Chiefs have a better chance to win than most think. There are specific reasons I picked those games....but, I won't be 'shocked' if the Chiefs don't win.

But, what fun is it to predict something that everyone else is predicting?

Besides, this board is so negative all the time, the homers merely balance it out a little.

And, predicting 0-16 or even 2-14 isn't 'realistic'..... it is pessimistic. Just like 3-3 is optimistic.
Eh, I used to do the same thing, so I respond to threads like this because I don't take it seriously. I have hope for the Chiefs, but it's all down the road.... at least 2 or 3 years down the road.

RiversRunRed 09-17-2009 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081224)
Take away a fluke tipped pass and the Broncos would have lost to the Cincinatti Bengals
FYP

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6081243)
Dude... I didnt bail anybody out. I was hardly following the conversation when I typed it lol. I was just giving my opinion on it and letting you know the way I see it.
Just having fun. My goodness..... thisss board issss so serioussss..... (in my best FAKE gay voice)...

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:44 AM
Well, I have to actually get back to work.... especially since I am driving up to KC to watch the Chiefs kill the Raiders....okay, okay.... eeek out a win against the Faiders.

Oh, and I have to think the Chiefs are going to win, or convince myself of it....otherwise making a 12 hour drive to watch my team lose sucks. I've know, I've done it.... A lot it seems over the last two years and in the playoffs.

KCrockaholic 09-17-2009 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiversRunRed (Post 6081249)
FYP
The Bungals almost beat the Donkeys?! Doh!

That game will be quickly forgotten about once the Donks start their losing slide. Broncs showed me they have nothing this year . They beat one of the worst teams in the NFL with one of the most one-dimensional attacks in all of football with only one true threat (OchoCinco). Ugly, Ugly game for both teams.

T-post Tom 09-17-2009 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081028)
What about the Cowboys is great to you? Seriously.

If they had a better coach, then perhaps, but otherwise this is a talented team that underachieves and loses focus.

They lost five of their road games last year, INCLUDING the game against the Rams.
No worries. Jessica is on a diet and will be back to humping form before the Chiefs meet up with the Cowboys. She should be shagging the mojo out of Romo the week leading up to the game. Jessica = Chiefs' win.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.
Page 4 of 7 123 4 567
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.