ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dallas Cowboys scouting report: Kansas City Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215761)

carlos3652 10-07-2009 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150418)
Buffalo signed him like 2 weeks ago making GB probably pretty upset he's gone.

I just dont understand why they would even risk it considering they blow... GB that is, why try to leave that guy on the PS...he wasnt good enough to be one of their best 4 OT?

Mile High Mania 10-08-2009 04:49 AM

It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

InChiefsHeaven 10-08-2009 06:36 AM

I guess the question is this...would Aaron Rodgers make those plays here in KC? Would Matt Cassel look as bad in Green Bay? He looked pretty damn good last year in New England...

notorious 10-08-2009 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149872)
It doesn't hurt that Rodgers has a much stronger arm and is more accurate, especially down the field.

So what you are saying is Rodgers is 10 times the quarterback that Cassell will ever be.......


B b b b buutt Cassell went 11-5! He was amazing last year!


Cassell was a waste. Period. People got pissed when I compared the move to our former GM's moves.

notorious 10-08-2009 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6150644)
It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

JD10367 10-08-2009 08:02 AM

On ESPN, Schlereth just talked about the "Upset Alert" for this week, and he nominated the Titans against the Colts, and the Chiefs against the Cowboys.

JD10367 10-08-2009 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6150702)
You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB. :)

Otter 10-08-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150341)
The absolutely obtuse arguments some people make are so far out there they deserve bitch slaps.

Let me break down yours:

I'm butt hurt that we didn't draft Sanchez and made up my mind about Cassell after 4 games with a shitty OL, new HC, GM, OC and no real receiving threat.

Send me your PayPal and I'll buy you a Mark Sanchez jersey so we can just get this over with already.

It's not your fault we didn't draft Sanchez Mecca. It's not your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault.

http://phoenix.fanster.com/blackjesu...your-fault.jpg

notorious 10-08-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6150785)
No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB. :)

Damnit, I forgot Colquitt, too!

Chief Faithful 10-08-2009 11:28 AM

So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

Saccopoo 10-08-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 6151338)
So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

Based on the first quarter performances, I think that team need is something like this:

1. Center
2. Guard
3. Inside "Will" linebacker
4. Tight end
5. Safety
6. Left offensive tackle
7. Punt/Kick returner
8. Right offensive tackle
9. Inside "Mike" linebacker
10. Wide receiver
11. Outside "Jack" linebacker
12. Fullback
13. Outside "Sam" linebacker
14. Cornerback
15. Kicker
16. Punter
17. Quarterback

Pioli Zombie 10-08-2009 12:26 PM

Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 10-08-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149852)
Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

It says Rodgers has Jennings & Driver.

milkman 10-08-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6151498)
Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

tonyetony 10-08-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6152170)
The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

I've watched all the Packers games and to say Cassel is getting the same time in the pocket as Rodgers is complete and utter BS. I know that Rodgers is taking some sacks and that the Packers line sucks but our line sucks much much much worse than theirs. I would swap our line for theirs any day of the week.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.