ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Whitlock has a great idea (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215814)

blaise 10-08-2009 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151748)
Okay. So where does this whole "apology" nonsense come from then?

Nothing.

Therefore it's baseless.

Are you a Bronco fan?

orange 10-08-2009 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 6151781)
He hit him in the chest with his shoulder. It was a bad call. They sent a letter saying the unnecessary roughness call was a mistake. I just can't imagine what you would need to convince you. At this point you MUST just be trolling.

Show me the letter.

That's ALL it will take.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failing that, let's watch and see the rest of the year if that penalty continues to be called.

orange 10-08-2009 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 6151782)
Are you a Bronco fan?

Yes.

Do you believe the NFL gives a rat's ass about keeping the little-franchise-that-couldn't (i.e. Chiefs) down?

Or maybe it was that particular ref who's a Broncos fan and was concerned that the 0-3 Chiefs would challenge for the Division title if they were less dominated by the Giants.

blaise 10-08-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151788)
Show me the letter.

That's ALL it will take.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failing that, let's watch and see the rest of the year if that penalty continues to be called.

That doesn't matter. It's not a fact that Page hit him in the neck. Regardless of whether that happens in the future it will not affect this at all.
I'll go out on a limb and guess Page will not be fined by the NFL for the hit because the NFL knows the call was wrong.

blaise 10-08-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151795)
Yes.

Do you believe the NFL gives a rat's ass about keeping the little-franchise-that-couldn't (i.e. Chiefs) down?

Um no, all star. I'm talking about your personal perception of the incident as a Bronco fan.

BigMeatballDave 10-08-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151788)
Show me the letter.

That's ALL it will take.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failing that, let's watch and see the rest of the year if that penalty continues to be called.

Or, you could watch the ****ing gif of the actual hit that proves you are wrong.

kysirsoze 10-08-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151788)
Show me the letter.

That's ALL it will take.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failing that, let's watch and see the rest of the year if that penalty continues to be called.

ROFL You're right. Page probably lied about getting the letter so he could cover his ass. At least until the league fines him for his public lie. That would be in addition to the fine he should shortly be receiving for his defenseless receiver hit.

orange 10-08-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 6151810)
ROFL You're right. Page probably lied about getting the letter so he could cover his ass. At least until the league fines him for his public lie. That would be in addition to the fine he should shortly be receiving for his defenseless receiver hit.

Page didn't lie. All he said was that the NFL said it wasn't a helmet-to-helmet hit. He didn't claim there was an apology.

YOU guys have added all that.

And my point is that IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HELMET-TO-HELMET HIT TO BE A PERSONAL FOUL ANYMORE.


I don't see what's so hard for some of you to understand about that.


.................................................................................................... ......................................................................

Why it's important to Page:

2008 NFL Fine Schedule

Flagrant Personal Foul
Suspension or fine; severity to be determined by degree of violation; the fine may be $10,000 or higher for first offense.

blaise 10-08-2009 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151814)
Page didn't lie. All he said was that the NFL said it wasn't a helmet-to-helmet hit. He didn't claim there was an apology.

YOU guys have added all that.

And my point is that IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HELMET-TO-HELMET HIT ANYMORE.


I don't see what's so hard for some of you to understand about that.

And you're adding that the NFL is saying it was helmet to neck.

BigMeatballDave 10-08-2009 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151814)
Page didn't lie. All he said was that the NFL said it wasn't a helmet-to-helmet hit. He didn't claim there was an apology.

YOU guys have added all that.

And my point is that IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HELMET-TO-HELMET HIT ANYMORE.


I don't see what's so hard for some of you to understand about that.

Quote:

Safety Jarrad Page said the NFL sent the Chiefs a letter acknowledging a mistake was made when Page was penalized for unnecessary roughness in last week’s loss to the Giants.

Page broke up a pass over the middle for wide receiver Steve Smith but was penalized for making helmet-to-helmet contact with Smith. Replays showed Page actually used his shoulder to hit Smith in the chest.
You are one obtuse bitch. Why the **** would Page even mention this if it WAS NOT AN APOLOGY from the League. The officials made a mistake. That is why the Chiefs got a letter. ****!

kysirsoze 10-08-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151814)
Page didn't lie. All he said was that the NFL said it wasn't a helmet-to-helmet hit. He didn't claim there was an apology.

YOU guys have added all that.

And my point is that IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HELMET-TO-HELMET HIT TO BE A PERSONAL FOUL ANYMORE.


I don't see what's so hard for some of you to understand about that.

FFS ...the letter, according to Page, said he shouldn't have been called for unnecessary roughness. The article goes on to explain what the video showed.

Regardless, even with the criteria you yourself posted, it was a clean hit. We all (most) get that it doesn't have to be helmet to helmet, but a shoulder to chest hit is completely clean and it was a shit call.

blaise 10-08-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151795)
Yes.

Do you believe the NFL gives a rat's ass about keeping the little-franchise-that-couldn't (i.e. Chiefs) down?

Or maybe it was that particular ref who's a Broncos fan and was concerned that the 0-3 Chiefs would challenge for the Division title if they were less dominated by the Giants.

Apparently you enjoy posting on the message board of the little franchise that couldn't more than a Broncos board.

orange 10-08-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 6151820)
And you're adding that the NFL is saying it was helmet to neck.

Wrong. SHOULDER to NECK AREA.

Don't twist it.

BigMeatballDave 10-08-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151831)
Wrong. SHOULDER to NECK AREA.

Don't twist it.

CHEST is NOT the NECK area.

kysirsoze 10-08-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 6151831)
Wrong. SHOULDER to NECK AREA.

Don't twist it.

The chest is the neck area?? What about the abdomen? That can be as close as a foot from the neck! WATCH OUT!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.