ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Cassel Is Failing Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216961)

tyler360 10-25-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6206631)
I can imagine that watching this guy play from the stands with a good view of the entire field would be enough to make ones head explode.

The only reason it did not explode was because of the rain. His reads are just as bad as a rookie

smittysbar 10-25-2009 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6206468)
It's a reeruned argument. In the first half, the ball was out within 3 seconds. If it wasn't out, it was because he was flushed by a defender within those 3 seconds.

It's an argument that people keep rattling off because they heard somebody else say it.

The accuracy issues are an issue. Claiming that a QB who doesn't have enough time to hold onto the ball too long holds the ball too long is ridiculous.

He held onto it it to long last year also, sure you have an excuse for that as well :spock:

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-25-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler360 (Post 6206641)
The only reason it did not explode was because of the rain. His reads are just as bad as a rookie

LMAO

Here, you need a General Piolio's Fried Chicken Nappy Meal; works every time!


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nqQTLgo_idc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nqQTLgo_idc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

luv 10-25-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler360 (Post 6206599)
I went to the game today and sat in the rain for the whole game. Cassel to me just does not look like he has the "it" factor. He missed so many open recievers today. It just really bugs me how he can be so bad game after game after game like this.

But it's NEVER his fault.

chiefzilla1501 10-25-2009 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 6206648)
He held onto it it to long last year also, sure you have an excuse for that as well :spock:

Because you keep saying "as well." It's not a ****ing issue this year. You're basically recycling an argument you heard somebody else used and you're ignoring the piles of evidence that show otherwise.

luv 10-25-2009 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6206729)
Because you keep saying "as well." It's not a ****ing issue this year. You're basically recycling an argument you heard somebody else used and you're ignoring the piles of evidence that show otherwise.

That he holds onto the ball when he should throw it away, or that he can't hit a receiver?

chiefzilla1501 10-25-2009 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6206738)
That he holds onto the ball when he should throw it away, or that he can't hit a receiver?

I've said that his inability to hit an open receiver is a problem.

Holding on to the ball is NOT a problem. And in most cases, he can't throw the ball away because there is usually a pass rusher surrounding him in all directions. For as much shit as he takes for taking the fetal position, when you're surrounded, the only thing you can do is protect the ball. Unless people are recommending he move backward and take a 10-yard bigger loss.

luv 10-25-2009 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6206752)
I've said that his inability to hit an open receiver is a problem.

Holding on to the ball is NOT a problem. And in most cases, he can't throw the ball away because there is usually a pass rusher surrounding him in all directions. For as much shit as he takes for taking the fetal position, when you're surrounded, the only thing you can do is protect the ball. Unless people are recommending he move backward and take a 10-yard bigger loss.

Okay. He's played 6 games this year. At what point do we start looking at other options?

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-25-2009 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6206738)
That he holds onto the ball when he should throw it away, or that he can't hit a receiver?

Complete the following sentences:

A _____ fell from a tree in the fall.

The Who broadcast a "farewell concert" in the early 80's from Toronto's Maple _____ Gardens.

I was raking my lawn, but I missed one single _____ that got caught in the sidewalk crack.


:D

TRR 10-25-2009 09:48 PM

Jay Cutler threw 3 INT's today and the Bears got crushed by the Bungles....does this mean that Cutler is terrible too?

This Cassel hate is ridiculous. He had a bad game...move on. The whole team sucks.
Posted via Mobile Device

chiefzilla1501 10-25-2009 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6206756)
Okay. He's played 6 games this year. At what point do we start looking at other options?

If that option was on the roster, that'd be one thing. But it's not. Croyle could be a good QB but you can't count on him to play a healthy 16 games.

I don't know the answer to this. Unfortunately, I don't think you get much more options after this season either. No QBs on the open market and probably the worst QB class in the history of the draft. I think the best you can do is just surround him with better players in 2010 and see if that makes a difference. If he's not good then, then you have a 2011 draft class that could have two outstanding QBs that are legit top 5 picks.

Mecca 10-25-2009 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6206756)
Okay. He's played 6 games this year. At what point do we start looking at other options?

It's not going to happen, that's Pioli's boy. They are tied, Cassel is starting for the next 3-4 years regardless of how bad he is.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-25-2009 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6206785)
I think the best you can do is just surround him with better players in 2010 and see if that makes a difference. If he's not good then, then you have a 2011 draft class that could have two outstanding QBs that are legit top 5 picks.

Ah...dare to dream.

DaneMcCloud 10-25-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6206783)
Jay Cutler threw 3 INT's today and the Bears got crushed by the Bungles....does this mean that Cutler is terrible too?

This Cassel hate is ridiculous. He had a bad game...move on. The whole team sucks.
Posted via Mobile Device

Are you joking?

Cutler ****ing sucks ass. I've been saying this for YEARS. Unlike all the other asswipes that thought Denver would fail without him, I've stated all along they'd be further ahead as a team with him gone.

Denver's 6-0. Chicago's 3-3.

BTW, Cutler hasn't QB'd a winning team since HIGH SCHOOL.

WildTurkey 10-25-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6206783)
Jay Cutler threw 3 INT's today and the Bears got crushed by the Bungles....does this mean that Cutler is terrible too?

This Cassel hate is ridiculous. He had a bad game...move on. The whole team sucks.
Posted via Mobile Device

This..... he's played 6 games for probably the least talented team in NFL history... shit even the best QB's in the NFL need some help... anyone who claims it's all his fault is a ****ing moron


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.