ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports **Missouri Valley Conference Title Game Thread** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224489)

kstater 03-07-2010 03:16 PM
I don't see WSU getting in.

Pitt Gorilla 03-07-2010 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo (Post 6585054)
please.
I'll have to assume you didn't watch the game today.

POND_OF_RED 03-07-2010 03:28 PM
This game was pretty boring. I'd really like to see Mizzou get a chance to play one of these teams the opening round. The athletic abilities shown on the court today were very minimal. I was surprised because I've heard UNI is actually pretty good but neither of these teams looked any good. It was slow and sloppy. UNI is going to get run off the court when they play a BCS school in the tournament. Then again this is just from watching this game. Maybe it was an off game for both of the schools. I just can't imagine either of these teams actually looking very impressive in a fast paced game.

ChiefsCountry 03-07-2010 03:28 PM
Next year in the Valley is going to be fun - Shox and Bears will be the best two teams. Man we are going to have some wars - on the court and off next year.

Coach 03-07-2010 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo (Post 6585046)
Me too, 13 seed?
13 to 15 seems doable. They have a nice RPI and they're what, 10-6 against top 50 in the RPI?
Posted via Mobile Device

Coach 03-07-2010 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo (Post 6585051)
He's a very good coach but he didn't have much talent after Turg. left. He's had to rebuild from scratch. This team only has one Sr. and won 25 games this year including being undefeated at home.
They have a nice core of young players. Now they just need to add some depth to make that team deep in terms of talent.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pitt Gorilla 03-07-2010 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED (Post 6585072)
This game was pretty boring. I'd really like to see Mizzou get a chance to play one of these teams the opening round. The athletic abilities shown on the court today were very minimal. I was surprised because I've heard UNI is actually pretty good but neither of these teams looked any good. It was slow and sloppy. UNI is going to get run off the court when they play a BCS school in the tournament. Then again this is just from watching this game. Maybe it was an off game for both of the schools. I just can't imagine either of these teams actually looking very impressive in a fast paced game.
UNI had the same players last year, played terribly in the NCAA tournament, and lost by 5 to a Purdue team that went fairly deep in the tourney. If they shoot well at all, UNI will have a shot.

kstater 03-07-2010 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6585079)
13 to 15 seems doable. They have a nice RPI and they're what, 10-6 against top 50 in the RPI?
Posted via Mobile Device

Try 1-3 vs Top 50

RPI 43 SOS 117

NIT bound.

Coach 03-07-2010 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6585093)
Try 1-3 vs Top 50

RPI 43 SOS 117

NIT bound.
My bad. I meant 10-6 in the top 100, not 50.
Posted via Mobile Device

ChiefsCountry 03-07-2010 03:54 PM
Shox are screwed. I don't see them getting a big dance invite. Its bc we aren't in a BCS cartel conference.

POND_OF_RED 03-07-2010 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6585090)
UNI had the same players last year, played terribly in the NCAA tournament, and lost by 5 to a Purdue team that went fairly deep in the tourney. If they shoot well at all, UNI will have a shot.
Purdue runs a slow paced game too though. I just don't see them athletic enough to play with a team that runs the court a lot. They seemed slow and they lacked good ball movement IMO.

ChiefaRoo 03-07-2010 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED (Post 6585072)
This game was pretty boring. I'd really like to see Mizzou get a chance to play one of these teams the opening round. The athletic abilities shown on the court today were very minimal. I was surprised because I've heard UNI is actually pretty good but neither of these teams looked any good. It was slow and sloppy. UNI is going to get run off the court when they play a BCS school in the tournament. Then again this is just from watching this game. Maybe it was an off game for both of the schools. I just can't imagine either of these teams actually looking very impressive in a fast paced game.
You don't understand how the Valley plays. The entire league is about slowing the game down, minimizing touches and playing lock down defense. Valley teams negate the athletic advantage and ugly the game up on purpose.

ChiefaRoo 03-07-2010 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6585088)
They have a nice core of young players. Now they just need to add some depth to make that team deep in terms of talent.
Posted via Mobile Device
I agree. It would be great if they can get a true point guard (JC) and a big body (JC) for fouls, D and rebounding.

ChiefaRoo 03-07-2010 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6585090)
UNI had the same players last year, played terribly in the NCAA tournament, and lost by 5 to a Purdue team that went fairly deep in the tourney. If they shoot well at all, UNI will have a shot.
UNI will win one game. I guarantee it.

Pitt Gorilla 03-07-2010 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo (Post 6585265)
UNI will win one game. I guarantee it.
Honestly, I'd be thrilled with one win.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.