DaneMcCloud |
04-07-2010 04:24 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaWolf
(Post 6658581)
Well, I could point out that he had the shot to beat out Damon Huard, and he couldn't do it. But that's beside the point. We can make excuses for guys like Croyle and Cassel all day long, bottom line is that they haven't performed in a Chiefs uniform.
|
Croyle was a second year, third round draft choice with a history of injury. He had Dick Curl and Mike Solari as his offensive mentors. That alone would be difficult for a QB of ANY talent level.
Croyle most certainly performed in Baltimore last year. This offense is perfect for his skills. His inability to stay healthy has always been his issue, not talent or skill level.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaWolf
(Post 6658581)
But in your opinion then, Croyle is a franchise QB that you would move forward with and build your 2010 Chiefs team around, and he would lead them to an eventual championship? Because if we're talking about someone to replace Cassel, that's the type of QB I'd be looking for. I just really don't see Croyle being that guy...
|
Would I build a franchise around Croyle, with his inability to remain healthy week in and week out? Hell no. But he's got far more talent and upside than Matt Cassel.
The Chiefs should draft Clausen, hands down, no question asked. I just doubt they do it.
|