ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Are You Smarter Than A Pioli? -2010 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227299)

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2010 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6717543)
1. Russell Okung, OT; OSU
2. Nate Allen, FS; SF
2. Brandon Spikes, MLB; UF
3. Damian Williams, WR; USC
4. Dennis Pitta, TE; BYU
5. Cam Thomas, DT; NC
5. Matt Tennant, C; BC
5. Chris Scott, OT; UT

Swap out the first three picks with Berry, Kindle and Lee, or Berry, Washington and Lee and I'd be happy with it as well.

B_Ambuehl 04-26-2010 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6716707)
Also Cam Thomas just falls into San Diego's lap, why is it some coincidence that good teams just have guys fall right to them?

They actually did move up in the 5th to get him. I was listening to an interview with Norv Turner yesterday and he said they actually thought about moving up to get him in the 4th.

Nightfyre 04-26-2010 09:29 PM

1. Eric Berry
2. Jimmy Clausen
2. Golden Tate
3. Jon Asamoah
4. Bruce Campbell
5. Perrish Cox
5. Cam Thomas
5. Jamar Chaney

Amnorix 04-26-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6716994)
my 2a. Hughes (at this point we two immediate playmakers at two levels of our defense)


I'm not a draftnik, but are you referring to the Hughes who was taken in the late 1st by the Colts? If so, he's not available at 2a.

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2010 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6717678)
I'm not a draftnik, but are you referring to the Hughes who was taken in the late 1st by the Colts? If so, he's not available at 2a.

He said he wanted to use a 4th to trade up to get him. He just listed it as 2a.

the Talking Can 04-26-2010 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6717678)
I'm not a draftnik, but are you referring to the Hughes who was taken in the late 1st by the Colts? If so, he's not available at 2a.

reread my post...it's a trade scenario...

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2010 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6716878)
Wait...you took Campbell in the 1st round...but you'd pass on him in the 2nd twice and the 3rd once?

???

You are really ****ing stupid.

Amnorix 04-26-2010 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6717684)
reread my post...it's a trade scenario...

Sorry, missed that.

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2010 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6717699)
Sorry, missed that.

No worries. It happens.

Reerun_KC 04-26-2010 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6716477)
Herm did too then.

ROFL

Well you got me there.... Rep!

Amnorix 04-26-2010 10:01 PM

Random note in a random thread -- Belichick mentioned in a radio interview today that two guys he took late in this year's draft (a 6 and a 7) were rated higher than late fourth round picks he made in the 2007 draft, "for example".

Clearly this draft was MUCH deeper than some prior drafts, and 2007 in particular, at least according to the Pats grading system.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2010 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6717716)
Random note in a random thread -- Belichick mentioned in a radio interview today that two guys he took late in this year's draft (a 6 and a 7) were rated higher than late fourth round picks he made in the 2007 draft, "for example".

Clearly this draft was MUCH deeper than some prior drafts, and 2007 in particular, at least according to the Pats grading system.

That's why many of us have said that we need more than the normal "2.5" starters out of this draft.

Amnorix 04-26-2010 10:04 PM

Another random note -- BB also mentioned, in a different interview, that despite a few stars such as Ted Washington, Ricky Watters and (especially) Brett Favre, the 1991 draft was probably one of the weakest in NFL history.

http://football.about.com/od/nfldraf...raftresult.htm

Amnorix 04-26-2010 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6717722)
That's why many of us have said that we need more than the normal "2.5" starters out of this draft.

So do the Patriots.

I'm pretty pleased with the Pats draft. Certainly having 5 picks in the first three rounds helps quite a bit. Flipping a late 3 into a 2, probably a mid-2, in 2011 was a nice bonus since we ended up drafting 12 players already and likely can't use them all regardless.

But I'm not a draftnik so I can't speak to teh specifics of the players we took. I just like the positions filled, the draft strategy, and the profiles I've read of the players we did take.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2010 10:26 PM

I think the Patriots did a very good job of addressing needs in this draft, even if I didn't necessarily agree with some of the players that they took.

I had them at one point for two straight years in the mock and added a punter both times. Mesko will really help you guys out in the field position game, which will be important.

The one thing I'm most critical of is Belichick's tunnel vision wrt: Florida players. I know that he has a close relationship with Meyer, but we've seen firsthand the dangers of a pro coach taking the advice of a college coach and selecting his players b/c of that close relationship.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.