ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rodney Harrison praises Berry (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=230749)

kcxiv 07-16-2010 04:36 PM

lol, some of you all act like 12 year olds. lol

SAUTO 07-16-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884125)
Or maybe the guy with the pickle up his ass regarding everything me, Dane, Hamas, Mecca, etc could quit acting like a dumbass.


JMO

again you couldnt be more wrong.

dane and i get along really well. ask him if you dont believe me.

hamas too most of the time.

and mecce i poked at a little about usc the other day but other than that i cant remember the last time i responded to a post from him.

your opinion is wrong again.
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6884134)
i didnt respond to what you call an analogy but its not a good one.

who does rodney play for again?

hes not going against cassel on the field.

and hes an ANALYST. why would he lie about how he feels about the guy?

and me following yoj around is laughable. when was the last time i even responded to one of your posts?
Posted via Mobile Device

Please cite all examples in which an ex-teammate turned analyst said anything remotely negative about someone's play on the field, or future.

I'm not talking the objective, "Player X had a bad game" or, "Player X made a poor decision there" type comments.

I'm talking about being asked about a player and responding, "that guy sucks" or, "that guy doesn't belong in the league" or, that guy has no future in the NFL."

Hell, 99% of current players and ex-players turned analysts won't even make the "Player X had a bad game" type comments.

KCrockaholic 07-16-2010 04:43 PM

This is supposed to be a happy thread about Eric Berry. Lets try to keep it happy. I know, I know, "the honey moon is over".

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6884154)
again you couldnt be more wrong.

dane and i get along really well. ask him if you dont believe me.

hamas too most of the time.

and mecce i poked at a little about usc the other day but other than that i cant remember the last time i responded to a post from him.

your opinion is wrong again.
Posted via Mobile Device

Someone break out a ****ing Webster's for Sauto so he can read the definitions for FACT and OPINION please.

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6884174)
This is supposed to be a happy thread about Eric Berry. Lets try to keep it happy. I know, I know, "the honey moon is over".

****, I love the Eric Berry pick. Can't wait to see how he turns out.

Now Sauto will be along shortly to tell you how I really don't mean that.

SAUTO 07-16-2010 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884163)
Please cite all examples in which an ex-teammate turned analyst said anything remotely negative about someone's play on the field, or future.

I'm not talking the objective, "Player X had a bad game" or, "Player X made a poor decision there" type comments.

I'm talking about being asked about a player and responding, "that guy sucks" or, "that guy doesn't belong in the league" or, that guy has no future in the NFL."

Hell, 99% of current players and ex-players turned analysts won't even make the "Player X had a bad game" type comments.

hell im pretty sure harrison was down on brady at one point live last year.

but that wasnt the point in your analogy.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 07-16-2010 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884175)
Someone break out a ****ing Webster's for Sauto so he can read the definitions for FACT and OPINION please.

well being that i KNOW it wasnt a fact it had to be your opinion
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6884196)
well being that i KNOW it wasnt a fact it had to be your opinion
Posted via Mobile Device

http://i41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

And can opinions be proven WRONG, by definition, genius?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6884154)
your opinion is wrong again.


o·pin·ion
   /əˈpɪnyən/ Show Spelled[uh-pin-yuhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.

orange 07-16-2010 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6884142)
lol, some of you all act like 12 year olds. lol

That's just your opinion!

SAUTO 07-16-2010 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884211)
http://i41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

And can opinions be proven WRONG, by definition, genius?




o·pin·ion
/pnyn/ Show Spelled[uh-pin-yuhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.

great man. you were still wrong. why lump all those people together? why do you think that because i think YOU are a conceited douchebag that i feel the same about them?

like i said hamas and dane are two of my favorite people around here. mecca i hadnt responded to in maybe months.

again you were wrong.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 07-16-2010 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884211)
http://i41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

And can opinions be proven WRONG, by definition, genius?




o·pin·ion
/pnyn/ Show Spelled[uh-pin-yuhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.

great man. you were still wrong. why lump all those people together? why do you think that because i think YOU are a conceited douchebag that i feel the same about them?

like i said hamas and dane are two of my favorite people around here. mecca i hadnt responded to in maybe months.

again you were wrong.

so is what you said about harrison ACTUALLY an opinion? he could prove you wrong right?
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6884142)
lol, some of you all act like 12 year olds. lol

Have the balls to specify which on of us, man.

I'm just sick of people arguing the poster instead of the post, and Sauto is King of doing it.

IN MY OPINION.

SAUTO 07-16-2010 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884239)
Have the balls to specify which on of us, man.

I'm just sick of people arguing the poster instead of the post, and Sauto is King of doing it.

IN MY OPINION.

lol again who do i do that to?
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 07-16-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6884235)
great man. you were still wrong. why lump all those people together? why do you think that because i think YOU are a conceited douchebag that i feel the same about them?

like i said hamas and dane are two of my favorite people around here. mecca i hadnt responded to in maybe months.

again you were wrong.

so is what you said about harrison ACTUALLY an opinion? he could prove you wrong right?
Posted via Mobile Device

:facepalm:

Nothing like ignoring the ****ing dictionary.

And you might want to check with those people to gather THEIR opinion. If all three of them think I'm full of shit regarding your constant nitpicking and Ms. Cleo imitations, MAYBE then you can start to consider having the grounds to call your opinion fact.

Otherwise, yours is just another opinion. Not right, not wrong.

And how do you suggest Harrison proving me wrong?

Saying it again?

You can tell me OJ Simpson didn't behead two people in 1994. A court of law even said he didn't.

That doesn't make it fact, and it's my OPINION that he did murder two people.

Read the definition of "opinion" until it sinks the **** in.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.